BiomaLearnFoodsNutrition factsNutrientsGuidesAnswersEvidence

Split peas: plenty of fiber, and a cholesterol result that belongs to pulses as a group

A 2026 meta-analysis of 38 randomized trials with 2095 people found that a median 4.6 oz (130 g) of whole pulses a day, over a median 6 weeks, lowered LDL cholesterol by 5.4 mg/dL (95% CI 3.1 to 7.3; metric: 0.14 mmol/L, 0.08 to 0.19), with similar results across pulse types. That is a finding about pulses as a group, and its authors asked for more trials on dried peas specifically. The one direct pea trial is less clear. In 6 weeks, adults with mildly high cholesterol who ate 4.2 oz (120 g) a day of cooked yellow and green peas had LDL 4.3 mg/dL (0.11 mmol/L) lower than a rice group (95% CI 0.29 lower to 0.07 higher), which did not reach significance. Beans in the same trial did reach it, at 0.21 mmol/L. The paper does not say whether its peas were split. On the plate, a cup of split peas cooked from dried, 180 g, gives about 211 calories, 14.9 g protein, 14.8 g fiber and 648 mg potassium, according to a US survey record whose recipe includes salt.

Every statement here is tied to a source. The badge says what kind of evidence stands behind it: A is a meta-analysis or systematic review, E is the position of an expert body without its own analysis. How we verify →

The numbers, per 3.5 oz (100 g)

USDA entrykcalProteinFatCarbsFiber
Peas, green, split, mature seeds, raw36423.1 g3.89 g61.6 g22.2 g
Peas, split, mature seeds, cooked, boiled, with salt1168.34 g0.39 g20.5 g8.3 g
Peas, split, mature seeds, cooked, boiled, without salt1188.34 g0.39 g21.1 g8.3 g

These are the USDA entries that are split peas, not foods made from it; they differ in cut, part, pack or preparation. Linked names have a page with the full profile and per-portion figures.

As people eat it, per 3.5 oz (100 g)

As eatenkcalProteinFatCarbsFiber
Split peas, from dried, fat added1687.75 g6.87 g19.6 g7.7 g
Split peas, from dried, no added fat1178.29 g0.39 g21 g8.2 g

USDA Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies (FNDDS, release 2024-10-31): split peas as it is prepared and served, from the recipes behind the national dietary survey, rather than a single laboratory sample.

What a real portion looks like

What cooking and storage change

What it does to your health

What people believe that the data does not support

Who this works differently for

The bottom line

Boiling changes the numbers a lot. UK tables list dried split peas at 910 mg potassium and 0.70 mg thiamin per 3.5 oz (100 g) raw, and at 270 mg and 0.11 mg once boiled in unsalted water. Part of that drop is simply added water, which rises from 12 to 67 percent of the weight, so compare cooked with cooked. The US record for cooked split peas carries 233 mg sodium per 3.5 oz (100 g) because its recipe adds salt, and that part is up to the cook. Blood sugar is where split peas get less credit than pulses in general. A 2026 systematic review of 40 single-meal studies counted lower glucose after pulses than after wheat products or white rice in 28 of them, and lower insulin in 16 of 24, without pooling them into one estimate. In one trial that review describes, a split yellow pea snack did not significantly lower glucose, while pinto bean and chickpea snacks did. A whole yellow pea snack even raised glucose more than the control. Those were processed snacks, and we have that trial only as the review retells it. Two short meal studies looked at fullness. In 25 young men, a single 250 calories meal of canned yellow split peas lowered appetite and cut how much they ate at a pizza meal 260 minutes later, compared with macaroni and cheese. In 35 healthy men, a meal of fava beans and split peas matched meals based on veal and pork or eggs for later intake and appetite, with no significant difference between any of them. The rest is weaker. In a 16-week trial of women with polycystic ovary syndrome, a low-GI diet of lentils, beans, split peas and chickpeas cut the insulin response to a glucose test by 121 against 27 uIU/mL x min on a standard lifestyle diet. Only 61 of the 95 women finished, and the difference sat right at p = 0.05. Six healthy adults on four days of bed rest saw HOMA-IR, a measure of insulin resistance, fall from 1.48 to 0.88 on a pulse diet. It stayed near 1.37 on a hospital diet, a result from six people over four days. A case-control study of 186 African-American adults linked eating legumes such as split peas with lower odds of colorectal adenoma (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.91), an association from a small sample with a very wide interval. We found no studies on allergy, pregnancy, children or drug interactions for split peas, so this page cannot say who should be careful with them.

Compared with other foods

All food comparisons

Split peas compared

Related foods

More from the same food group (legumes and legume products)

Sources

  1. spp-daily-r3-01 · food composition dataset
    Split peas, from dried, no added fat | FNDDS code 41303000 | fdc_id 2707420 | 1 cup 10205 = 180 g | 1 oz dry, yield after cooking 40014 = 70 g | per 100 g: Energy 117 kcal, Protein 8.29 g, Carbohydrate 20.97 g, Fiber 8.2 g, Iron 1.28 mg, Folate DFE 61 ug, Potassium 360 mg, Sodium 233 mg
    USDA FNDDS, Split peas, from dried, no added fat, food code 41303000, fdc_id 2707420 · checked 2026-09-28
  2. spp-daily-r3-02 · food composition dataset
    Peas, split, dried, raw | CoFID 13-141 | Energy 328 kcal | Protein 22.1 g | Water 12.1 g | Iron 5.40 mg | Potassium 910 mg | Thiamin 0.70 mg || Peas, split, dried, boiled in unsalted water | CoFID 13-142 | Energy 126 kcal | Protein 8.3 g | Water 67.3 g | Iron 1.70 mg | Potassium 270 mg | Thiamin 0.11 mg
    CoFID 2021, Public Health England, Peas, split, dried, raw (13-141) and boiled in unsalted water (13-142), OGL v3.0 · checked 2026-09-28
  3. spp-daily-r3-03 · meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Thirty-eight trials (52 trial comparisons, n=2095) with a median of 6 weeks and dose of 130 g/d (0.5-0.67 cup/d) showed that whole dietary pulses decreased low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (mean difference, -0.14 mmol/L [95% CI, -0.19 to -0.08]), non-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (-0.22 mmol/L [95% CI, -0.30 to -0.14]), ... Analyses by pulse type showed similar results. ... Future studies on chickpeas, dried peas, and lentils are warranted.
    J Am Heart Assoc, 2026 · checked 2026-09-28
  4. spp-daily-r3-05 · randomized crossover trial
    Males (n = 25; 21.3 ± 0.5 years; 21.6 ± 0.3 kg·m(-2)) randomly consumed 4 isocaloric meals: chickpea; lentil; yellow split pea; and macaroni and cheese (control). ... The lentil and yellow pea, but not chickpea, treatments led to lower appetite ratings during the 260 min prepizza meal period, and less FI at the pizza meal, compared with macaroni and cheese (p < 0.05).
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab, 2011 · checked 2026-09-28
  5. spp-daily-r3-06 · randomized crossover trial
    We investigated how a meal based on vegetable protein (fava beans/split peas) affected ad libitum energy intake and appetite sensations, compared to macronutrient-balanced, iso-caloric meals based on animal protein (veal/pork or eggs). Thirty-five healthy men were enrolled in this acute cross-over study. ... There were no differences in ad libitum energy intake across test meals (p > 0.05).
    Nutrients, 2018 · checked 2026-09-28
  6. spp-daily-r3-08 · case-control study
    In a case-control design, 186 men and women with a mean of 58 years of age were studied. ... Study results revealed that consumption of legumes such as dried beans, split peas, or lentils was negatively associated with risk (OR = 0.19; 95% CI: 0.04-0.91).
    J Natl Black Nurses Assoc, 2006 · checked 2026-09-28
  7. spp-daily-r3-09 · systematic review
    Most of the articles in this review reported that non-oil-seed pulses cause lower glucose (28 of 40 studies) and insulin (16 of 24 studies) responses than other starchy foods in the control groups (mainly wheat-flour-based products or white rice).
    Nutr Rev, 2026 · checked 2026-09-29
  8. spp-daily-r3-11 · randomized controlled trial
    Mean LDL-cholesterol was lower in the bean group (-0.21; 95% CI: -0.39, -0.03) but not the pea group (-0.11; 95% CI: -0.29, 0.07) relative to rice after 6 wk.
    J Nutr, 2024 · checked 2026-09-29
  9. spp-daily-r3-10 · systematic review
    Johnston et al reported a significantly smaller increase in glucose compared with the control following consumption of the pinto bean and chickpea snacks only, but reported no significant effects following consumption of the split yellow pea and green lentil snacks. Consumption of the whole yellow pea snack even led to an increased glucose response compared with the control.
    Nutr Rev, 2026 · checked 2026-09-29
  10. spp-daily-r3-04 · randomized controlled trial
    We compared the effects of a low-glycemic index pulse-based diet, containing lentils, beans, split peas, and chickpeas, to the Therapeutic Lifestyle Changes (TLC) diet on cardio-metabolic measures in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Ninety-five women (18⁻35 years) enrolled in a 16-week intervention; 30 women in the pulse-based and 31 in the TLC groups completed the study. ... The pulse-based group had a greater reduction in total area under the curve for insulin response to a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (mean change ± SD: -121.0 ± 229.9 vs. -27.4 ± 110.2 µIU/mL × min; p = 0.05)
    Nutrients, 2018 · checked 2026-09-28
  11. spp-daily-r3-07 · randomized crossover trial
    Using a randomized, counter-balanced cross-over design with one-month washout, six healthy individuals (30 ± 12 years) consumed the diets during four days of bed rest. ... decreased HOMA-IR (1.38 ± 0.54 to 1.37 ± 0.50 hospital diet vs. 1.48 ± 0.54 to 0.88 ± 0.37 pulse-based diet; p = 0.022), and attenuated the increase in Ntx (+89 ± 75% hospital diet vs. +33 ± 20% pulse-based diet; p = 0.035).
    Nutrients, 2019 · checked 2026-09-28

Review. Reviewed on 2026-09-29 for evidence level, dose and population context, and claims a reader could misread. Bioma Learn has no human medical reviewer at this time, and we say so rather than invent one. Methodology. This is information, not medical advice.