BiomaLearnFoodsNutrition factsNutrientsGuidesAnswersEvidence

Vermicelli: one name for at least three different noodles

Vermicelli is one name for at least three different noodles, and the evidence splits along that seam. In 10 healthy adults aged 20 to 30, mung bean glass noodles scored a glycemic index of 28 and an insulin index of 38, the lowest of five Chinese staple starches tested against brown rice at 82. That number belongs to bean starch and does not carry over to wheat or rice vermicelli, which were tested separately: two British rice vermicelli products came out low glycemic index, while a plain steamed vermicelli roll came out high. In 18 adults, boiled mung bean noodles gave glucose and insulin responses like raw starch, while cooking raised the response sharply for every other starch in that 1989 trial, which says something about the bean starch matrix rather than about how long you boil. US food databases hold exactly one item called vermicelli and it is made from soy, so every published nutrient figure under this name describes a bean-starch noodle. US law reads the other way: 21 CFR 139.110(d) defines vermicelli as a wheat macaroni product in cord shape no thicker than 0.06 inch.

Every statement here is tied to a source. The badge says what kind of evidence stands behind it: A is a meta-analysis or systematic review, E is the position of an expert body without its own analysis. How we verify →

The numbers, per 3.5 oz (100 g)

USDA entrykcalProteinFatCarbsFiber
Vermicelli, made from soy3310.1 g0.1 g82.3 g3.9 g

These are the USDA entries that are vermicelli, not foods made from it; they differ in cut, part, pack or preparation. Linked names have a page with the full profile and per-portion figures.

As people eat it, per 3.5 oz (100 g)

As eatenkcalProteinFatCarbsFiber
Vermicelli, made from soybeans1260.04 g0.04 g31.4 g1.5 g

USDA Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies (FNDDS, release 2024-10-31): vermicelli as it is prepared and served, from the recipes behind the national dietary survey, rather than a single laboratory sample.

How much is actually in it

What a real portion looks like

What your body absorbs

What cooking and storage change

Safety, limits and interactions

What people believe that the data does not support

Who this works differently for

What is still unknown

The bottom line

The single USDA record, soy vermicelli, carries 1.916 mg of copper per 3.5 oz (100 g), which is 213 percent of the Daily Value, plus 27 microgram of selenium and 4.24 mg of zinc. Those numbers are per 3.5 oz (100 g) of dry noodle, no UK entry exists to check them against, and there are no Foundation samples, so the figure comes with no range around it. US survey coding puts both a cup and an unstated quantity at 140 g, meaning the coders do not distinguish a typical portion and 140 g is not a measurement of what anyone ate. No cooking retention factor exists for vermicelli in the US reference table under any of its food groups, so how much of that copper, selenium or zinc survives boiling is unknown rather than unaffected. What the cooking evidence does show is that the dish decides more than the noodle does. Among 15 adults in Hong Kong tested on 23 traditional foods, fried rice vermicelli Singapore style landed among the six low glycemic index foods while a plain steamed vermicelli roll landed among the seven high ones. The fried version carries fat that slows stomach emptying and the roll is made from rice batter, so two dishes are being compared, and the abstract gives categories without a number for either. Two British supermarket rice vermicelli products, from Guilin and Jiangxi, came out low glycemic index in 14 adults in Great Britain, inside a range of 37 to 92 across ten rice foods, again with no separate number for either product. The caution on this page is about handling rather than about the noodle. At a village banquet in Sichuan in August 2009, pork mixed with vermicelli carried 12 times the odds of illness (95% CI 4.4 to 32) in an analysis of 50 cases and 50 controls, with a dose-response trend, and Salmonella blegdam was isolated from that dish. Another dish at the same banquet ran at odds of 7.4 and the authors saw interaction between the two, so the vermicelli may have been the carrier and not the source. In a Hangzhou outbreak in 2014 the median incubation was three hours and staphylococcal enterotoxin turned up in six food and three stool samples out of 18 tested, and that toxin is heat stable, so reheating the noodles does not remove it. In a Malaysian boarding school in November 2021, a quarter of 597 girls aged 13 to 17 fell ill, and vermicelli was one of four canteen dishes linked to it at 17 times the odds (95% CI 4.03 to 71.86). Beef rendang, rice and rice cubes had overlapping intervals, the study cannot separate them, and the investigators named cross-contamination and storage temperature as the cause. Cold noodles mixed with meat and left standing are the pattern in all three outbreaks. No regulator has approved a health claim for vermicelli, in the EU register or in 21 CFR 101. We found no study on allergy, pregnancy, children or drug interactions for it, and no composition data at all for the wheat vermicelli that US law says the word means.

More from the same food group (legumes and legume products)

Sources

  1. vrmc-daily-r3-01 · food composition dataset audit
    [1] USDA COMPOSITION · records 1 · reference Vermicelli, made from soy (FDC 169884, sr_legacy, Legumes and Legume Products)
    USDA FoodData Central, SR Legacy, FDC 169884, and USDA FNDDS 41425010 · checked 2026-09-25
  2. vrmc-daily-r3-02 · food composition dataset
    copper 1.916 mg 213% DV
    USDA FoodData Central, SR Legacy, FDC 169884 · checked 2026-09-25
  3. vrmc-daily-r3-03 · dietary survey portion dataset
    1 cup · 10205 140
    USDA FNDDS, food code 41425010, FDC 2707450 · checked 2026-09-25
  4. vrmc-daily-r3-05 · randomized crossover trial
    Ten healthy subjects aged between 20-30 years were recruited. ... Among the five starchy foods, brown rice evoked the highest GI and GL at 82 ± 0.2 and 18 ± 0.2, followed by taro (69 ± 0.4, 12 ± 0.2), adlay (55 ± 0.4, 10 ± 0.2), yam (52 ± 0.3, 9 ± 0.0) and mung bean noodles (28 ± 0.5, 7 ± 0.2), respectively.
    World J Gastroenterol, 2010 · checked 2026-09-25
  5. vrmc-daily-r3-06 · randomized controlled trial
    Eighteen healthy subjects randomly assigned received three different starches under one form of conditioning. ... However, cooked mung bean noodles gave metabolic responses similar to those of raw products. Close correlations were found between percentages of in vitro starch hydrolysis at 30 min and mean areas under the glycemic curves and the insulinemic curves (r = 0.95, p less than 0.001).
    Am J Clin Nutr, 1989 · checked 2026-09-25
  6. vrmc-daily-r3-07 · randomized crossover trial
    Fifteen healthy subjects (8 males and 7 females) volunteered to consume either glucose or one of 23 test foods after 10-14 h overnight fast. ... Among all the 23 Chinese traditional foods tested, 6 of them belonged to low GI foods (Tuna Fish Bun, Egg Tart, Green Bean Dessert, Chinese Herbal Jelly, Fried Rice Vermicelli in Singapore-style, and Spring Roll), 10 of them belonged to moderate GI foods (Baked Barbecued Pork Puff, Fried Fritter, "Mai-Lai" Cake, "Pineapple" Bun, Fried Rice Noodles with Sliced Beef, Barbecue Pork Bun, Moon Cakes, Glutinous Rice Ball, Instant Sweet Milky Bun, and Salted Meat Rice Dumpling), the others belonged to high GI foods (Fried Rice in Yangzhou-Style, Sticky Rice Wrapped in Lotus Leaf, Steamed Glutinous Rice Roll, Jam and Peanut Butter Toast, Plain Steamed Vermicelli Roll, Red Bean Dessert, and Frozen Sweet Milky Bun).
    World J Gastroenterol, 2010 · checked 2026-09-25
  7. vrmc-daily-r3-09 · outbreak case-control study
    86.0% (43/50) of the cases and 34.0% (17/50) of the controls had eaten pork-mixed-vermicelli(OR = 12.0, 95%CI: 4.4 - 32). ... Three cases were detected carrying Salmonella blegdam from their anus swabs and the same bacteria type was also detected in the pork-mixed-vermicelli.
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi, 2011 · checked 2026-09-25
  8. vrmc-daily-r3-11 · outbreak investigation
    The incubation period was 1.5-5.0 hours, of which the median was 3 during the outbreak. ... Conclusion: This foodborne outbreak was caused through food poisoning by vermicelli which was contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus.
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi, 2017 · checked 2026-09-25
  9. vrmc-daily-r3-12 · standard of identity
    Vermicelli is the macaroni product the units of which are cord-shaped (not tubular) and not more than 0.06 inch in diameter.
    21 CFR 139.110, Macaroni products · checked 2026-09-25
  10. vrmc-daily-r3-08 · randomized crossover trial
    The glycaemic response to nine types of rice (white basmati, brown basmati, white and brown basmati, easy-cook basmati, basmati and wild rice, long-grain rice, easy-cook long-grain rice, Thai red rice, Thai glutinous rice) and two types of rice vermicelli (Guilin rice vermicelli, Jiangxi rice vermicelli) commercially available in the United Kingdom were compared against a glucose standard in a non-blind, randomized, repeated-measure, crossover design trial. ... The study indicated that rice noodles, long-grain rice, easy-cook long-grain rice and white basmati rice were low-GI foods, whilst all of the other foods were medium-GI and high-GI foods.
    Int J Food Sci Nutr, 2009 · checked 2026-09-25
  11. vrmc-daily-r3-10 · outbreak case-control study
    A total of 152 cases were identified among the 597 students, giving an attack rate of 25.5%. All cases were females aged 13-17 years. ... The foods associated with becoming a case were beef rendang (a dry curry) (odds ratio [OR]: 20.54, 95% CI: 4.89-86.30), rice (OR: 19.62, 95% CI: 2.62-147.01), rice cubes (OR: 18.17, 95% CI: 4.31-76.55) and vermicelli (OR: 17.02, 95% CI: 4.03-71.86).
    Western Pac Surveill Response J, 2023 · checked 2026-09-25
  12. vrmc-daily-r3-04 · retention factor table audit
    «vermicelli»: no method, and not even FDC knows such a product.
    USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007) · checked 2026-09-25

Review. Reviewed on 2026-09-25 for evidence level, dose and population context, and claims a reader could misread. Bioma Learn has no human medical reviewer at this time, and we say so rather than invent one. Methodology. This is information, not medical advice.