BiomaLearnFoodsNutrition factsNutrientsGuidesAnswersEvidence

Peas and split peas: the pulse effect that peas did not show

By dose-response meta-analysis of 38 randomized trials in 2095 adults, about 4.6 oz (130 g) of whole pulses a day over a median of 6 weeks lowered LDL cholesterol by 5.4 mg/dL (0.14 mmol/L), with a confidence interval of -0.19 to -0.08. GRADE certainty ran from moderate to high for every outcome except apoB, which was rated very low. Peas belong to that class. The one trial that tested them on their own did not reproduce the effect. In 180 adults with mild hypercholesterolemia in two Canadian cities, in three arms of 60 for 6 weeks, 4.2 oz (120 g) of peas a day gave an LDL difference against rice of -4.3 mg/dL (-0.11 mmol/L), with a confidence interval of -0.29 to 0.07. That interval crosses zero. The same amount of beans in the same trial lowered LDL by 8.1 mg/dL (0.21 mmol/L), interval -0.39 to -0.03. The dose-response part of the meta-analysis was demonstrated for beans and not separately for peas, and its authors write that trials on dried peas specifically are still wanted.

Every statement here is tied to a source. The badge says what kind of evidence stands behind it: A is a meta-analysis or systematic review, E is the position of an expert body without its own analysis. How we verify →

We have no USDA entry for peas | split peas itself in this cohort. The evidence below stands on published studies rather than on a composition table, and we would rather say that than show you a number for something else.

How much is actually in it

What a real portion looks like

What your body absorbs

What cooking and storage change

What it does to your health

Safety, limits and interactions

What people believe that the data does not support

The bottom line

What pulses do more consistently is flatten the curve after a meal. A systematic review gathered 40 human crossover studies published between 2001 and 2024, mostly in apparently healthy adults, with three in type 2 diabetes. Pulses produced a lower post-meal glucose response than the starchy control in 28 of the 40 studies, and a lower insulin response in 16 of 24. That is a count of studies rather than a pooled effect size, and the controls were mostly wheat products or white rice. It tells you what to swap, not how much you gain. Fiber is the reason to keep split peas in the cupboard, and cooking is where most of the headline number goes. Raw split peas carry 22.2 g of dietary fiber per 3.5 oz (100 g) by the USDA reference record, against 8.3 g in the cooked records. Per portion it still adds up. One cup of cooked split peas weighs 6.5 oz (185 g) and brings 14.2 g of fiber, against 8.3 g in a cup of raw green peas and 9.7 g in a cup of split pea soup. Those per-portion figures are recalculated from the 100 g values rather than weighed out. Boiling 15 to 20 minutes and draining costs 40 percent of the folate and 35 percent of the thiamin by the USDA retention table. That table is set for the legume group as a whole, dates from 1975, and carries no factor for fiber at all. Treat the mineral figures as approximate. USDA gives raw split peas 0.809 mg of copper per 3.5 oz (100 g) and the UK CoFID dataset gives 0.17 mg, a gap of 79 percent with no stated reason, while the two datasets agree on thiamin within 3 percent. For canned green peas, where USDA did sample lots, copper ranged from 0.0847 to 0.159 mg per 3.5 oz (100 g) across 8 lots and iron from 0.913 to 1.38 mg. No sampled lots exist for dried split peas, so the spread of the food in this entry is unmeasured. Pea allergy exists and is badly mapped. A scoping review screened 8976 titles and found only 47 studies covering pea, chickpea, lentil and lupine together, with the research concentrated on prevalence and not one study addressing allergen labeling or educational needs. It gives no separate figure for peas and no measure of how common the allergy is. That is the gap, and it is not a reassurance. The cards behind this page hold nothing on pregnancy, kidney disease or interactions with medicines. Two further claims are weaker than they sound. Observational data linking pulse-heavy eating to modestly lower colorectal cancer risk rest on 15 human studies, of which a single pooled case-control analysis carries the signal, and the signal attenuates once lifestyle and diet are adjusted for. Laboratory work on phytic acid, lectins, tannins and enzyme inhibitors in legumes shows a direction only, with soaking, germination and fermentation among the treatments that cut them, and no human outcome measured. The authors of the 38-trial meta-analysis also note that no health claim exists for any pulse for cholesterol reduction.

Each food on its own

Sources

  1. peasp-daily-r2-08 · food composition dataset
    Peas, green, split, mature seeds, raw (FDC 172428, sr_legacy, Legumes and Legume Products): copper 0.809 MG per 100 g (range across 3 records 0.181-0.809), dietary fibre 22.2 G (range 8.3-22.2), thiamin 0.719 MG (range 0.19-0.719)
    USDA FoodData Central, SR Legacy, FDC 172428 · checked 2026-09-25
  2. peasp-daily-r2-09 · food composition dataset
    Peas, split, dried, raw, CoFID code 13-141: Protein (g) 22.1, Starch (g) 54.7, NSP (g) 6.3, Potassium (mg) 910, Iron (mg) 5.40, Zinc (mg) 3.8, Copper (mg) 0.17, Thiamin (mg) 0.70, Magnesium (mg) 130
    CoFID 2021, Public Health England · checked 2026-09-25
  3. peasp-daily-r2-10 · food composition dataset
    Peas, green, sweet, canned, sodium added: Copper, Cu 0.1233 MG, range 0.0847-0.159 (median 0.1295), 8 samples, spread 60% ... Iron, Fe 1.139 MG, range 0.913-1.38 (median 1.16), 8 samples, spread 41% ... Calcium, Ca 28.21 MG, range 21.4-36.9 (median 26.75), 8 samples, spread 55%
    USDA FoodData Central, Foundation Foods, release 2026-04-30 · checked 2026-09-25
  4. peasp-daily-r2-11 · food portion dataset
    Split peas, from dried, fat added, FNDDS code 41303010 (fdc_id 2707421): Fiber, total dietary 7.7 G per 100 g, 1 cup 185 g with 14.2 G ... Green peas, raw (fdc_id 2709797): Fiber, total dietary 5.7 G per 100 g, 1 cup 145 g with 8.3 G ... Soup, split pea (fdc_id 2707459): 1 cup 255 g with 9.7 G
    USDA FoodData Central, FNDDS survey foods, release 2024-10-31 · checked 2026-09-25
  5. peasp-daily-r2-06 · systematic review of processing technologies
    Naturally occurring compounds in foods, such as tannins, saponins, phytic acid, gossypol, lectins, and various enzyme inhibitors (protease inhibitors (PIs) and amylase inhibitors), function as anti-nutritional factors (ANFs) that hinder the absorption of essential vitamins and minerals, negatively impacting nutritional bioavailability and human health.
    J Food Sci, 2025 · checked 2026-09-25
  6. peasp-daily-r2-12 · nutrient retention factor table
    LEGUMES,CKD 15/20MIN,BOILED,DRAINED, Retn_Code 501, group Legumes and Legume Products (code 16): folate_total_ug 60% remains / 40% loss, vitamin_c_mg 65% / 35%, thiamin_mg 65% / 35%, copper_mg 70% / 30%, potassium_mg 75% / 25%, iron_mg 85% / 15%, zinc_mg 85% / 15%
    USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6, 2007 · checked 2026-09-25
  7. peasp-daily-r2-01 · systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of RCTs
    Thirty-eight trials (52 trial comparisons, n=2095) with a median of 6 weeks and dose of 130 g/d (0.5-0.67 cup/d) showed that whole dietary pulses decreased low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (mean difference, -0.14 mmol/L [95% CI, -0.19 to -0.08]), non-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (-0.22 mmol/L [95% CI, -0.30 to -0.14]), apoB (apolipoprotein B) (-0.08 g/L [95% CI, -0.13 to -0.03]) and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (-0.03 mmol/L [95% CI, -0.05 to -0.01]) with no effects on other lipids.
    J Am Heart Assoc, 2026 · checked 2026-09-25
  8. peasp-daily-r2-03 · randomized controlled trial
    Mean LDL-cholesterol was lower in the bean group (-0.21; 95% CI: -0.39, -0.03) but not the pea group (-0.11; 95% CI: -0.29, 0.07) relative to rice after 6 wk. ... Beans, but not peas, lowered LDL-cholesterol, relative to rice, in adults with mild hypercholesterolemia.
    J Nutr, 2024 · checked 2026-09-25
  9. peasp-daily-r2-04 · systematic review of human intervention studies
    Most of the articles in this review reported that non-oil-seed pulses cause lower glucose (28 of 40 studies) and insulin (16 of 24 studies) responses than other starchy foods in the control groups (mainly wheat-flour-based products or white rice).
    Nutr Rev, 2026 · checked 2026-09-25
  10. peasp-daily-r2-07 · scoping review
    After screening 1244 records, 15 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising five case-control studies, five 4-week randomised controlled trials (RCTs), one 8-week randomised crossover trial, one controlled feeding study, two prospective cohort studies, and one other prospective study. Observational data from a single pooled case-control study suggest that higher pulse-dominant legume intake is compatible with modestly lower colorectal cancer risk, although the findings are mixed and often attenuate after adjustment for lifestyle and dietary confounders.
    Nutrients, 2026 · checked 2026-09-25
  11. peasp-daily-r2-05 · scoping review
    Of the 8976 titles identified, 47 were included subsequent to full-text screening. Most studies identified focused on prevalence, and were conducted in Europe, with additional studies from Asia, and North America. ... Moreover, no studies addressed labeling or educational needs for these allergens.
    J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract, 2021 · checked 2026-09-25
  12. peasp-daily-r2-02 · systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of RCTs
    Although dietary pulses are recognized by major clinical practice guidelines to reduce cholesterol and coronary heart disease risk, intake is low. There are no health claims for any pulse for cholesterol reduction, which could support uptake. ... Future studies on chickpeas, dried peas, and lentils are warranted.
    J Am Heart Assoc, 2026 · checked 2026-09-25

Review. Reviewed on 2026-09-25 for evidence level, dose and population context, and claims a reader could misread. Bioma Learn has no human medical reviewer at this time, and we say so rather than invent one. Methodology. This is information, not medical advice.