BiomaLearnFoodsNutrition factsNutrientsGuidesAnswersEvidence

Ground beef: the lean label is a range, the risk is in the handling

In a randomized crossover feeding trial, 25 men with a mean BMI of 31 ate five 115 g ground beef patties a week for five weeks, and both their LDL and HDL cholesterol fell whether the patties were 24 or 5 percent fat. The abstract does not give the size of the change, and the trial included only men. Both arms ate beef, so it compared two fat levels rather than beef against no beef. The number on the pack is looser than it looks. Eight USDA samples sold as 90 percent lean averaged 12.85 g of fat per 3.5 oz (100 g) raw and reached 14.75 g, while samples sold as 80/20 ranged from 15.4 to 26.5 g. How you cook it changes the plate as well. Pan fried and drained, 24 percent fat patties lost nearly 41 percent of their fat, while 5 percent fat patties lost none that could be measured, in one frying method tested in the lab.

Every statement here is tied to a source. The badge says what kind of evidence stands behind it: A is a meta-analysis or systematic review, E is the position of an expert body without its own analysis. How we verify →

The numbers, per 3.5 oz (100 g)

USDA entrykcalProteinFatCarbsFiber
Beef, ground, 70% lean meat / 30% fat, patty cooked23822.9 g15.5 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, 70% lean meat / 30% fat, patty, cooked, broiled27725.4 g18.7 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, 70% lean meat / 30% fat, raw33214.3 g30 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, 75% lean meat / 25% fat, loaf, cooked25424.6 g16.5 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, 75% lean meat / 25% fat, raw29315.8 g25 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked27025.8 g17.8 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, 85% lean meat / 15% fat, patty, cooked25025.9 g15.4 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, 90% lean meat / 10% fat, patty, cooked20425.2 g10.7 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, 93% lean meat / 7% fat, patty, cooked19326.2 g8.94 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, 93% lean meat / 7% fat, raw15220.9 g7 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, 93% lean meat /7% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled18225.6 g8.01 g0.06 g0 g
Beef, ground, 95% lean meat / 5% fat, patty, cooked17426.3 g6.8 g0 g0 g
All 43 USDA entries for ground beef (31 more)
USDA entrykcalProteinFatCarbsFiber
Beef, ground, 95% lean meat / 5% fat, raw13721.4 g5 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, 97% lean meat / 3% fat, patty, cooked15326.4 g4.46 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, 97% lean meat / 3% fat, raw12122 g3 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, 97% lean meat /3% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled14426 g3.65 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, patties, frozen29523.1 g21.8 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, unspecified fat content, cooked24025.1 g14.5 g0.62 g0 g
Beef, Australian, imported, grass-fed, ground, 85% lean / 15% fat, raw23917.7 g18.1 g0 g0 g
Beef, grass-fed, ground, raw19819.4 g12.7 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, 70% lean meat / 30% fat, crumbles, cooked, pan-browned27025.6 g17.9 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, 70% lean meat / 30% fat, loaf, cooked, baked24123.9 g15.4 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, 75% lean meat / 25% fat, crumbles, cooked, pan-browned27726.3 g18.2 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, 75% lean meat / 25% fat, patty, cooked, broiled27925.6 g18.9 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, 75% lean meat / 25% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled24823.4 g16.4 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, crumbles, cooked, pan-browned27227 g17.4 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, loaf, cooked, baked25425.2 g16.2 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled24624 g15.9 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, raw24817.5 g19.4 g0 g— g
Beef, ground, 85% lean meat / 15% fat, crumbles, cooked, pan-browned25627.7 g15.3 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, 85% lean meat / 15% fat, loaf, cooked, baked24025.9 g14.4 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, 85% lean meat / 15% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled23224.6 g14 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, 90% lean meat / 10% fat, crumbles, cooked, pan-browned23028.4 g12 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, 90% lean meat / 10% fat, loaf, cooked, baked21426.6 g11.1 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, 90% lean meat / 10% fat, patty, cooked, broiled21726.1 g11.8 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, 90% lean meat / 10% fat, raw19018.2 g12.8 g0 g— g
Beef, ground, 93% lean meat / 7% fat, crumbles, cooked, pan-browned20928.9 g9.51 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, 93% lean meat / 7% fat, loaf, cooked, baked19227 g8.43 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, 95% lean meat / 5% fat, crumbles, cooked, pan-browned19329.2 g7.58 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, 95% lean meat / 5% fat, loaf, cooked, baked17427.3 g6.37 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, 95% lean meat / 5% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled16425.8 g5.94 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, 97% lean meat / 3% fat, crumbles, cooked, pan-browned17529.5 g5.46 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, 97% lean meat / 3% fat, loaf, cooked, baked15427.6 g4.06 g0 g0 g

These are the USDA entries that are ground beef, not foods made from it; they differ in cut, part, pack or preparation. Linked names have a page with the full profile and per-portion figures.

As people eat it, per 3.5 oz (100 g)

As eatenkcalProteinFatCarbsFiber
Beef, ground26125.6 g16.8 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, patty27225.4 g18.2 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, raw21318.4 g14.9 g0 g0 g
Beef, ground, with egg and onion22821.9 g14.5 g1.05 g0.1 g

USDA Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies (FNDDS, release 2024-10-31): ground beef as it is prepared and served, from the recipes behind the national dietary survey, rather than a single laboratory sample.

How much is actually in it

What a real portion looks like

What your body absorbs

What cooking and storage change

What it does to your health

Safety, limits and interactions

What people believe that the data does not support

Who this works differently for

What is still unknown

The bottom line

What the meat delivers is protein, zinc and iron. Raw 90 percent lean held about 4.2 mg zinc and 2.1 mg iron per 3.5 oz (100 g) in USDA samples. In 16 healthy adults aged 65 to 85, a meal with 3.5 oz (100 g) of lean ground beef produced about 47 percent higher muscle protein synthesis over six hours than a matched vegan meal. That is a short-term response and says nothing yet about muscle mass over months. In young women on a controlled diet, iron absorption rose as lean ground beef went from 3 to 9 oz a day, with little extra gained beyond 3 oz, in a study whose abstract does not give the number of women. By the USDA factors for broiled ground beef, zinc stays at 100 percent and iron at 95, while vitamin B6 falls to 60 percent and B12 to 80. A medium or quarter-pound patty weighs 3 oz (85 g) cooked, and an ounce of raw mince cooks down to 20 g. Two popular worries have only thin evidence either way. In a pig model of early puberty, daily patties from hormone-implanted cattle did not bring puberty on sooner, and tofu carried about 170 times the estrogen activity of that beef, an animal study that has not been repeated in children. In 30 adults eating a 950 calories high-fat meal, a plant-based patty and an 80 percent lean beef patty produced the same inflammatory and metabolic response over four hours, which points at the fat load of the meal. In 27 men eating five patties a week for five weeks, only the grain-fed beef, which was higher in oleic fat, raised HDL cholesterol, and the pasture-fed beef did not. The real caution is contamination. Ground beef caused 17 of the 38 beef-linked Salmonella outbreaks reported to the CDC between 2002 and 2011, partly because detection improved over those years. In 2,885 US retail samples bought in 2010, Salmonella turned up in under 1 percent of ground beef packages and Campylobacter in 7.35 percent, and that survey did not test for toxin-producing E. coli. A meta-analysis of 33 studies found Salmonella in 10.8 percent of cattle deep lymph nodes, tissue that can end up in ground beef trimmings, more often in warm months, and how many bacteria that adds to finished mince is largely unknown. The most serious outcomes we found were in children. Among 316 children with bloody diarrhea in Georgia, 20 percent developed hemolytic uremic syndrome and 5 died, and ground beef products carried a relative risk of 4.52 alongside locally made ice cream and dairy, from records that cannot prove which food caused which case. We have no card yet on the cooking temperature or the handling steps for ground beef, so this page cannot give them, and nothing on it should be read as saying that undercooked mince is safe, for children least of all. We found no study of ground beef with medicines or in kidney disease.

Compared with other foods

All food comparisons

Ground beef compared

Related foods

More from the same food group (beef products)

Sources

  1. gbf-r5-02 · USDA FoodData Central Foundation Foods, dataset
    Beef, ground, 90% lean meat / 10% fat, raw: Zinc, Zn 4.194 MG range 3.67-5.16 n=8; Iron, Fe 2.128 MG range 1.95-2.59 n=8; Cholesterol 65.9 MG range 61.1-75.5 n=8. Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, raw: Zinc, Zn 3.848 MG range 3.43-4.26 n=8; Iron, Fe 1.965 MG range 1.56-2.61 n=8; Cholesterol 67.74 MG range 61.5-75.0 n=8
    USDA FoodData Central, Foundation Foods, FDC 2514743 and 80/20 raw, release 2026-04-30 · checked 2026-09-29
  2. gbf-r5-08 · USDA FNDDS, dataset
    Beef, ground, patty (FNDDS 21500310, fdc_id 2705855): 1 miniature patty 30 g; 1 small patty 65 g; 1 medium patty 85 g; 1 quarter lb patty 85 g; 1 large patty 120 g; 1 oz yields 20 g; 1 cup 125 g
    USDA FNDDS, FDC 2705855 (food code 21500310) · checked 2026-09-29
  3. gbf-r5-09 · cross-sectional survey
    On the day of recall, 49.3%, 40.2%, 26.3%, and 15.3% adults consumed total beef, lean fresh beef, ground beef, and processed beef, respectively, with mean intakes of 45.6, 36.6, 21.3, and 6.23 g/day, respectively.
    Nutr Res, 2022 · checked 2026-09-29
  4. gbf-r5-03 · randomized crossover trial
    As the amount of beef in the diet increased, the bioavailability of iron increased. ... Results of this study also suggest that little increase in zinc and iron utilization is realized by including more than 3 oz beef per day in the diet.
    J Am Diet Assoc, 1992 · checked 2026-09-29
  5. gbf-r5-04 · animal feeding trial
    Pigs fed the diets with 9 mg Zn/kg from GB or ZnCO(3) were not different in Zn availability and retained about 70% Zn (apparent balance and (65)Zn) compared with 30% (P ≤ 0.05) for pigs fed the diet with 9 mg Zn/kg from SP.
    J Anim Sci, 2014 · checked 2026-09-29
  6. gbf-r5-05 · randomized crossover trial
    Ingestion of MEAT resulted in ∼47% higher postprandial muscle protein synthesis rates when compared with the ingestion of PLANT (0.052 ± 0.023 and 0.035 ± 0.021 %/h, respectively; paired-samples t test: P = 0.037).
    J Nutr, 2024 · checked 2026-09-29
  7. gbf-r5-06 · USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, dataset
    USDA-RETN-R6:603 BEEF,BROILED GROUND, group Beef Products: vitamin_b6_mg 60% retained, thiamin_mg 80%, vitamin_b12_ug 80%, magnesium_mg 85%, folate_total_ug 85%, phosphorus_mg 90%, niacin_mg 90%, iron_mg 95%, zinc_mg 100%, copper_mg 100%
    USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6, 2007, Retn_Code 603 · checked 2026-09-29
  8. gbf-r5-07 · laboratory measurement
    The LF patties did not lose a detectable amount of fat following pan frying, but the HF patties lost nearly 41% fat after frying.
    Nutrients, 2023 · checked 2026-09-29
  9. gbf-r5-10 · randomized crossover trial
    The HF and LF treatments decreased the plasma concentrations of HDL-C (p = 0.001) and LDL-C (p = 0.011).
    Nutrients, 2023 · checked 2026-09-29
  10. gbf-r5-11 · randomized crossover trial
    Only the high-MUFA ground beef intervention increased the HDL-C concentration from baseline (P = 0.02).
    J Nutr, 2011 · checked 2026-09-29
  11. gbf-r5-12 · surveillance analysis
    Ground beef emerged as an important vehicle in the 2000s; it was implicated in 17 (45%) of the 38 beef-attributed outbreaks reported during 2002-2011.
    Epidemiol Infect, 2015 · checked 2026-09-29
  12. gbf-r5-13 · cross-sectional survey
    The prevalence of Salmonella in ground beef packages was 0.42% for modified atmosphere packaging, 0.63% for chub packaging, and 0.59% for overwrapped packages.
    J Food Prot, 2012 · checked 2026-09-29
  13. gbf-r5-14 · meta-analysis of prevalence
    The pooled Salmonella prevalence in DTLNs was 10.8% (95% CI [7.5, 14.5]), with significant heterogeneity between studies.
    Int J Food Microbiol, 2026 · checked 2026-09-29
  14. gbf-r5-01 · USDA FoodData Central Foundation Foods, dataset
    Beef, ground, 90% lean meat / 10% fat, raw: Total lipid (fat) 12.85 G range 10.92-14.75 n=8; Protein 18.15625 G range 17.75-18.6875. Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, raw: Total lipid (fat) 19.44 G range 15.37-26.46 n=8; Protein 17.53125 G range 16.6875-18.5
    USDA FoodData Central, Foundation Foods, FDC 2514743 and 80/20 raw, release 2026-04-30 · checked 2026-09-29
  15. gbf-r5-16 · animal feeding trial
    RESULTS: E2 equivalents (nanogram per kilogram, as fed as analyzed by E-Screen) of the tofu (a soy-based product) supplement were ∼570 times the natural and ∼170 times the implanted supplements.
    J Nutr, 2014 · checked 2026-09-29
  16. gbf-r5-17 · randomized crossover trial
    Overall, inclusion of a reformulated PBMA within a high-fat meal resulted in a similar cardiometabolic response to a nearly identical meal containing animal protein (ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT06445296).
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab, 2025 · checked 2026-09-29
  17. gbf-r5-15 · retrospective cohort
    High RR for food products consumed by children with bloody diarrhea either complicated with HUS or not were various ice-creams produced locally (RR 4.23 P<0.001), dairy products (RR 2.79 P = 0.01), ground beef products (RR 4.52 P<0.001).
    Georgian Med News, 2018 · checked 2026-09-29
  18. sf-stec-r3-groundbeef-1 · agency advice
    STECs produce large quantities of a potent toxin that forms in the intestine and causes severe damage to the lining of the intestine. This causes a disease called hemorrhagic colitis, and may also cause hemolytic uremic syndrome, particularly in young children. ... Children under 5 years old, pregnant women, people aged 65 or older and those with immune systems that have been weakened by cancer, kidney disease and other illnesses are most at risk and vulnerable to illnesses associated with contaminated food.
    Ground Beef and Food Safety, USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service · checked 2026-10-08
  19. gbf-r5-18 · meta-analysis of prevalence
    Concentration data were substantially underreported, with only two studies providing sufficient data for a preliminary quantitative synthesis.
    Int J Food Microbiol, 2026 · checked 2026-09-29

Review. Reviewed on 2026-09-29 for evidence level, dose and population context, and claims a reader could misread. Bioma Learn has no human medical reviewer at this time, and we say so rather than invent one. Methodology. This is information, not medical advice.