BiomaLearnFoodsNutrientsGuidesAnswersEvidence

An apple a day, and the juice that undoes it

Two apples a day for eight weeks lowered total and LDL cholesterol in 40 adults with mildly raised cholesterol. The comparison drink carried the same sugar and the same calories, so the fruit did something the sugar did not do. The size of the effect was modest. What is striking sits next door: in a separate crossover trial whole apples took about 7 percent off LDL while clear apple juice put about 7 percent back on, so the two forms of the same fruit point in opposite directions. The authors name the reason without hedging. Strip out the pectin and the cell walls and the cholesterol effect leaves with them, and clear juice is what is left after you do that.

Every statement here is tied to a source. The badge says what kind of evidence stands behind it: A is a meta-analysis or systematic review, E is the position of an expert body without its own analysis. How we verify →

The numbers, per 100 g

USDA entrykcalProteinCarbsFiber
Apples, canned, sweetened, sliced670.18 g16.8 g2 g
Apples, dehydrated, sulfured, uncooked3461.32 g93.5 g12.4 g
Apples, dried, sulfured, stewed570.22 g15.3 g2 g
Apples, dried, sulfured, uncooked2430.93 g65.9 g8.7 g
Apples, raw, with skin520.26 g13.8 g2.4 g
Apples, raw, without skin480.27 g12.8 g1.3 g
Apples, raw, without skin, cooked530.26 g13.6 g2.4 g
Apples, dehydrated (low moisture), sulfured, stewed740.28 g19.9 g2.6 g
Apples, dried, sulfured, stewed, with added sugar830.2 g20.7 g1.9 g
Apples, frozen, unsweetened, heated (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program)470.29 g12 g1.3 g
Apples, frozen, unsweetened, unheated (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program)480.28 g12.3 g1.3 g
Apples, fuji, with skin, raw580.15 g15.7 g2.08 g

These are the USDA entries that are apple, not foods made from it. Follow a name for the full profile and per-portion figures. Showing 12 of 17 USDA entries that are apple; the rest differ only in cut, pack or preparation.

How much is actually in it

What a real portion looks like

What cooking and storage change

What it does to your health

What people believe that the data does not support

Who this works differently for

The bottom line

Eat the apple whole, skin on, and treat clear juice as a different food. That is the one instruction here the data supports twice over. Hold the rest lightly. The eight-week trial fed people 7337 apples of a single green variety grown in one Italian valley and kept in the dark at 4 degrees, and nobody has shown that a supermarket Gala behaves the same way. Organic is not the variable: apples of the same cultivar grown organically and conventionally carried the same polyphenols and delivered the same amount into the blood. Europe allows the pectin-and-cholesterol claim only above 6 grams of pectin a day, a threshold written for supplements rather than for fruit, and it refused the claim that pectin makes you feel full. If apples make your mouth or throat itch and you react to birch pollen, the variety you pick will not save you. In a provocation study of 66 people with that allergy, an apple bred to be hypoallergenic was tolerated worse than three ordinary cultivars. Take that one to an allergist, because the amount of the main allergen does not predict who reacts.

Sources

  1. apple-b-05 · randomised crossover and double-blind randomised intervention studies
    No significant differences in the polyphenol content and the antioxidant capacity from the organic and conventional farming system were observed.
    Briviba et al., European Journal of Nutrition, 2010 · checked 2026-09-21
  2. apple-b-03 · randomised controlled crossover trial
    Whole apple (WA) consumption decreased serum total (WA: 5.89 mmol/L; CB: 6.11 mmol/L; P = 0.006) and LDL cholesterol (WA: 3.72 mmol/L; CB: 3.86 mmol/L; P = 0.031), triacylglycerol (WA: 1.17 mmol/L; CB: 1.30 mmol/L; P = 0.021), and intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1 (WA: 153.9 ng/mL; CB: 159.4 ng/mL; P = 0.028), and increased serum uric acid (WA: 341.4 μmol/L; CB: 330 μmol/L; P = 0.020) compared with the CB.
    Koutsos et al., The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2020 · checked 2026-09-21
  3. apple-b-07 · regulation, Commission Regulation (EU) No 432/2012
    The claim may be used only for food which provides a daily intake of 6 g of pectins.
    Commission Regulation (EU) No 432/2012, консолідований текст від 2016-01-01, перелік дозволених заяв про здоров'я · checked 2026-09-21
  4. apple-b-01 · randomised dietary crossover trial
    Trends towards a lower serum LDL-concentration were observed after whole apple (6.7%), pomace (7.9%) and cloudy juice (2.2%) intake. On the other hand, LDL-cholesterol concentrations increased by 6.9% with clear juice compared to whole apples and pomace.
    Ravn-Haren et al., European Journal of Nutrition, 2013 · checked 2026-09-21
  5. apple-b-02 · randomised dietary crossover trial
    We conclude that the fibre component is necessary for the cholesterol-lowering effect of apples in healthy humans and that clear apple juice may not be a suitable surrogate for the whole fruit in
    Ravn-Haren et al., European Journal of Nutrition, 2013 · checked 2026-09-21
  6. apple-b-04 · randomised controlled crossover trial, intervention materials
    A total of 7337 apples were delivered to the University of Reading, United Kingdom in 7 batches between November 2013 and May 2014.
    Koutsos et al., The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2020 · checked 2026-09-21
  7. apple-b-08 · regulatory register entry
    POL-HC-7734 Pectins Induce satiety sensation Non-authorised
    EU Register on nutrition and health claims, заява POL-HC-7734, знімок 2026-09-21 · checked 2026-09-21
  8. apple-b-06 · double-blind oral provocation study
    Contrary to expectations, B:0654 was less well tolerated than the other three cultivars.
    Kschonsek et al. / Vlieg-Boerstra group, International Archives of Allergy and Immunology, 2013 · checked 2026-09-21

Review. This page predates our review log, so no review date is shown; it is queued for a fresh review. Last updated 2026-09-22. Bioma Learn has no human medical reviewer at this time, and we say so rather than invent one. Methodology. This is information, not medical advice.