BiomaLearnFoodsNutrition factsNutrientsGuidesAnswersEvidence

Ricotta cheese: two small trials about muscle, and a lot of borrowed evidence

Most of what gets said about ricotta is borrowed from the protein it is made of. The strongest study here is a meta-analysis of 18 randomized tracer trials in 602 people, and it tested whey protein swallowed as a drink rather than cheese eaten as food. Whey delivered 57 percent of its phenylalanine into the blood over 5 hours (SD 10), against 45 percent for casein and 65 percent for milk protein (P < 0.001). Older participants absorbed 45 percent where young ones absorbed 51. The cheese itself has been fed to people twice, both times in Mexico, both times at 210 g a day. In 100 men and women over 60 who did not have sarcopenia, 12 weeks of that produced 1.3 lb (0.6 kg) more appendicular muscle mass while the control group lost 2.2 lb (1.0 kg) (between-group P = 0.009). Those controls ate as usual, so the trial compares adding food with changing nothing, and the standard deviations of 7.7 and 5.7 lb (3.5 and 2.6 kg) are wider than either figure. Ricotta is also a fresh soft cheese, the kind CDC tells pregnant women, people 65 or older and people with weakened immunity to avoid unless it is heated until steaming hot.

Every statement here is tied to a source. The badge says what kind of evidence stands behind it: A is a meta-analysis or systematic review, E is the position of an expert body without its own analysis. How we verify →

The numbers, per 3.5 oz (100 g)

USDA entrykcalProteinFatCarbsFiber
Ricotta cheese, whole milk1577.81 g11 g6.86 g— g
Cheese, ricotta, part skim milk13811.4 g7.91 g5.14 g0 g

These are the USDA entries that are ricotta cheese, not foods made from it; they differ in cut, part, pack or preparation. Linked names have a page with the full profile and per-portion figures.

As people eat it, per 3.5 oz (100 g)

As eatenkcalProteinFatCarbsFiber
Cheese, Ricotta1489.6 g9.46 g6 g0 g

USDA Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies (FNDDS, release 2024-10-31): ricotta cheese as it is prepared and served, from the recipes behind the national dietary survey, rather than a single laboratory sample.

What your body absorbs

What cooking and storage change

What it does to your health

Safety, limits and interactions

Who this works differently for

The bottom line

The second trial is the one that complicates the first. In 40 people over 60 who already had sarcopenia, the same 210 g a day for three months changed total appendicular muscle not at all. Only the men gained, by 270 g, and that came out of a secondary analysis in a trial where 12 of 20 people finished the ricotta arm. A systematic review of dairy and aging names ricotta as the food behind the muscle finding and calls the evidence base scarce, which is fair. It rests on six studies, five of them cohorts, spread across three separate outcomes. So the honest summary is that a large daily portion of a high-protein food may help older people hold on to muscle. It rests on one small trial against an inactive comparison, and in people who had already lost muscle it did not work. Two observational findings sit on opposite sides of the ledger, and neither can show cause. In 802 healthy adults in Palermo, with statin users and people with diabetes or heart disease excluded, reported ricotta intake was associated with higher LDL cholesterol (p < 0.001) while milk intake was associated with lower (p < 0.005). Total dairy intake showed no association at all, and intake came from a questionnaire. Pooling 21 cohorts covering over a million women and 37861 invasive breast cancers, eating 0.88 oz (25 g) a day or more of cottage or ricotta cheese went with a 15 percent lower rate of estrogen-receptor-negative tumors (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.95). There was no clear association with breast cancer overall, that is one tumor subtype among many comparisons, and cottage cheese was counted together with ricotta. Safety is where the cheese itself matters most, because ricotta is a fresh soft cheese and that is the category Listeria travels in. Across 100 prevalence surveys, Listeria monocytogenes was found in 2.4 percent of soft cheese samples (95% CI 1.6 to 3.6), though the authors warn that the studies varied too much for a single global number to be used in risk assessment. A US outbreak announced in 2026 and linked to requesón, a soft ricotta-type cheese, made 15 people ill in 4 states, put 14 in hospital and killed 1. CDC notes that fresh soft cheeses made with pasteurized milk have caused outbreaks, this one included. In laboratory challenge tests Listeria grew rapidly in all eight brands of fresh ricotta tested, and the acids in the cheese did not hold it back. FDA notes that the longer a contaminated ready-to-eat food is kept in the fridge the more it can grow, that freezing does not kill it, and that the fridge should be at 4°C (40°F) or below. The people for whom this matters are pregnant women, people 65 or older and anyone with a weakened immune system. CDC says about 1 in 25,000 pregnant women in the US get Listeria each year and 1 in 4 of them lose the pregnancy or the baby shortly after birth. In older people and people with weakened immunity, infection almost always means hospital and about 1 in 6 die. For these groups CDC lists unheated fresh soft cheeses such as requesón and queso blanco among foods to avoid, even when made with pasteurized milk. Heating them to 74°C (165°F) or until steaming hot moves them to the safer column. FDA tells the same groups not to eat unpasteurised milk products or any queso fresco-type cheese. Neither agency uses the word ricotta in that advice, and we found no study of ricotta in children. There is nothing in the American or European claim registers under its name either. Lactose is the other open edge. In 62 women, half of them lactose maldigesters, eating 34 g of lactose a day for a week raised flatus frequency and the sense of rectal gas, while bloating, abdominal pain, diarrhea and overall symptom severity were no worse than on 2 g a day. That lactose came from milk, cheese and yogurt, not from ricotta.

Compared with other foods

All food comparisons

Ricotta cheese compared

Related foods

More from the same food group (dairy and egg products)

Sources

  1. rict-r3-07 · meta-analysis of RCTs
    Casein ingestion resulted in a smaller (45% ± 11%), whey protein ingestion in an intermediate (57% ± 10%), and milk protein ingestion in a greater (65% ± 13%) fraction of dietary protein-derived phenylalanine appearing in the circulation (P < 0.001).
    J Nutr, 2020 · checked 2026-09-24
  2. rict-r3-08 · randomized controlled trial
    Women with lactose maldigestion reported significantly increased flatus frequency and subjective impression of rectal gas during the period of high lactose intake; however, bloating, abdominal pain, diarrhea, and the global perception of overall symptom severity were not significantly different between the 2 treatment periods.
    Am J Clin Nutr, 1998 · checked 2026-09-24
  3. hf2-rict-4 · Agency guidance
    Any unheated queso fresco-type cheeses, when made with pasteurized or unpasteurized (raw) milk, such as queso fresco, or similar fresh, soft cheeses such as queso blanco and requesón. ... Queso fresco-type cheeses or unpasteurized (raw) milk cheeses when heated to 165°F or until steaming hot
    CDC, Preventing Listeria Infection, Safer Food Choices · checked 2026-10-08
  4. hf2-rict-6 · Agency guidance
    The longer ready-to-eat refrigerated foods contaminated with L. monocytogenes are stored in the refrigerator, the more opportunities there are for this pathogen to grow. To slow down or prevent the growth of L. monocytogenes, keep the refrigerator at 40° F (4° C) or below, and the freezer at 0° F (-18° C). ... Unlike most bacteria, L. monocytogenes can grow at refrigeration temperatures and freezing will not eliminate or reduce the pathogen.
    US Food and Drug Administration, Listeria (Listeriosis) · checked 2026-10-08
  5. hf2-rict-7 · laboratory challenge test
    Challenge tests with eight brands of fresh ricotta showed rapid growth of Listeria monocytogenes and significant variability in physical-chemical characteristics. ... Interestingly, a lack of anti-listerial effect of organic acids in ricotta was observed in this study.
    Food Microbiology, 2019 · checked 2026-10-08
  6. rict-r3-01 · randomized controlled trial
    ASMM increased in the IG/HD + RCH (0.6±3.5 kg), but decreased in the CG/HD (-1.0±2.6). The relative change between groups was statistically significant (P=0.009).
    Clin Interv Aging, 2014 · checked 2026-09-24
  7. rict-r3-03 · systematic review
    The consumption of dairy products by older people may reduce the risk of frailty, especially with high consumption of low-fat milk and yogurt, and may also reduce the risk of sarcopenia by improving skeletal muscle mass through the addition of nutrient-rich dairy proteins (ricotta cheese) to the habitual diet.
    Adv Nutr, 2019 · checked 2026-09-24
  8. rict-r3-04 · cohort study
    However, multivariate analyses showed an inverse association between serum LDL-C and milk intake as well as a positive association between ricotta cheese intake and LDL-C concentrations.
    Nutrients, 2021 · checked 2026-09-24
  9. rict-r3-05 · pooled cohort analysis
    differences by ER status were suggested for yogurt and cottage/ricotta cheese with associations observed for ER-negative tumors only (pooled HR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.83, 0.98 comparing ≥60 g/d with <1 g/d of yogurt and 0.85, 95% CI: 0.76, 0.95 comparing ≥25 g/d with <1 g/d of cottage/ricotta cheese)
    Am J Clin Nutr, 2021 · checked 2026-09-24
  10. hf2-rict-5 · Outbreak notice
    Cases: 15 ... Hospitalizations: 14 ... Deaths: 1 ... States: 4 ... Be aware that fresh soft cheeses made with pasteurized milk have caused Listeria outbreaks, including this one. ... For pregnant women, Listeria can cause pregnancy loss, premature birth, or a life-threatening infection in newborns.
    CDC, Listeria Outbreak Linked to Requesón/Soft Ricotta Cheese, June 2026 (updated Aug. 26, 2026) · checked 2026-10-08
  11. rict-r3-06 · meta-analysis of prevalence studies
    we estimated L. monocytogenes prevalence in deli meat at 2.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3 to 3.6%), in soft cheese at 2.4% (95% CI, 1.6 to 3.6%), and in packaged salad at 2.0% (95% CI, 1.2 to 3.1%)
    J Food Prot, 2019 · checked 2026-09-24
  12. hf2-rict-1 · Agency guidance
    Every year in the United States, about 1 in 25,000 pregnant women are infected with Listeria. ... Sadly, 1 in 4 pregnant women who get this illness lose their pregnancy or their baby shortly after birth.
    CDC, Listeria infection, people at risk: protect your pregnancy from Listeria · checked 2026-10-08
  13. hf2-rict-2 · Agency guidance
    More than half of all Listeria infections occur among people 65 years and older. Older adults with Listeria infection almost always have to be hospitalized. Sadly, 1 in 6 older adults with this infection die. ... People with a weakened immune system make up 75% of all people with Listeria infection. Infection almost always leads to hospitalization. Sadly, 1 in 6 people in this group with Listeria infection die.
    CDC, Listeria infection, people at risk: protect your pregnancy from Listeria · checked 2026-10-08
  14. hf2-rict-3 · Agency guidance
    While listeriosis can present as a mild disease in pregnant woman, the infection can lead to serious complications with their pregnancy, including miscarriage and stillbirth. ... Pregnant women, the elderly, and those with weakened immune systems should not eat certain foods, including unpasteurized milk and unpasteurized milk products, any queso fresco-type cheeses, raw and smoked fish, raw sprouts, and certain other raw foods, which carry a high risk for L. monocytogenes.
    US Food and Drug Administration, Listeria (Listeriosis) · checked 2026-10-08
  15. rict-r3-02 · randomized controlled trial
    Secondary analysis showed that the men in the intervention group gained 270 g in TASM compared to those in the control group, and improved their fasting insulin levels (P = 0.05), muscle strength, lean body mass in the arms, and body weight variables.
    Clin Interv Aging, 2012 · checked 2026-09-24

Review. Reviewed on 2026-10-08 for evidence level, dose and population context, and claims a reader could misread. Bioma Learn has no human medical reviewer at this time, and we say so rather than invent one. Methodology. This is information, not medical advice.