BiomaLearnFoodsNutrition factsNutrientsGuidesAnswersEvidence

Rice crackers: few trials, small effects, and the arsenic of rice

The rice cracker is sold as the light snack, and the trials on it are few and small. In a randomized trial of 30 healthy adults, 10 per group, 2.4 oz (68 g) of crispy rice cracker eaten with breakfast was followed within 24 hours by lower Collinsella and Bifidobacterium in stool than lower-GI Thai desserts. That was a single serving, the abstract gives no effect size, and the authors say the shift may be temporary. In a trial in healthy adults and people with type 2 diabetes, plain rice crackers and whole grain buckwheat crackers gave similar blood glucose and insulin over 3 hours. Crackers that did lower the glucose and insulin rise in a crossover trial were made from a specially bred high resistant starch rice, and the abstract names neither the number of people nor the size of the change. The steadier finding is about what the cracker carries. A survey of retail rice products found crackers with arsenic at levels typical of rice grain, 75.2 to 90.1% of it inorganic, though the abstract gives no concentration for crackers alone.

Every statement here is tied to a source. The badge says what kind of evidence stands behind it: A is a meta-analysis or systematic review, E is the position of an expert body without its own analysis. How we verify →

The numbers, per 3.5 oz (100 g)

USDA entrykcalProteinFatCarbsFiber
Rice crackers41610 g5 g82.6 g0 g

These are the USDA entries that are rice crackers, not foods made from it; they differ in cut, part, pack or preparation. Linked names have a page with the full profile and per-portion figures.

As people eat it, per 3.5 oz (100 g)

As eatenkcalProteinFatCarbsFiber
Crackers, rice41610 g5 g82.6 g0 g

USDA Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies (FNDDS, release 2024-10-31): rice crackers as it is prepared and served, from the recipes behind the national dietary survey, rather than a single laboratory sample.

How much is actually in it

What a real portion looks like

What your body absorbs

What it does to your health

Safety, limits and interactions

Who this works differently for

The bottom line

Across about 8,300 Americans aged 6 and over, rice cakes and crackers had the largest association of any food with the arsenic metabolite DMA in adolescents, and with MMA in children and adolescents. This is a link with urine levels from a 24-hour food recall. It says nothing yet about illness. The caution that follows from it is about children and adolescents, in whom the link was strongest. The USDA record lists 156 mg magnesium, 25.5 mcg selenium and 0.436 mg thiamin per 3.5 oz (100 g), from one sample with no spread reported. A single cracker weighs about 3 g and an unspecified serving 18 g, which works out to about 7 mg and 42 mg of sodium when recalculated from 233 mg per 3.5 oz (100 g). Salted and flavored kinds can differ. For wheat allergy, one Japanese case report from 2004 found undeclared wheat protein in 3 of 8 retail rice crackers, and a wheat-allergic infant had a systemic reaction after 9 g of crackers, about 13.5 microg of wheat protein. It is one case, but it means "rice" on the pack is no guarantee for a highly sensitive child. We found no study on pregnancy or kidney disease. Hard rice crackers turn up in dental research as a test of chewing. About 15% of 482 independently living 70-year-olds in Japan reported trouble with them, together with apples and grilled beef, linked to deeper gum pockets. In a randomized trial of new complete dentures, a soft silicone liner improved self-rated chewing of hard crackers only after 3 months. In 105 patients with swallowing problems, 92.4% ate a test cracker without aspiration on camera, so 7.6% did aspirate. That describes a test done under a camera, and does not show the cracker is safe for someone with swallowing problems.

Related foods

More from the same food group (snacks)

Sources

  1. rcrk-daily-r5-06 · food composition survey
    A wide range of rice products had total and inorganic arsenic levels that typified those found in rice grain including, crisped rice, puffed rice, rice crackers, rice noodles and a range of Japanese rice condiments as well as rice products targeted at the macrobiotic, vegan, lactose intolerant and gluten intolerance food market. Most As in rice products are inorganic As (75.2-90.1%).
    Environment International, 2009 · checked 2026-09-30
  2. rcrk-daily-r5-11 · USDA SR Legacy dataset
    Rice crackers, SR Legacy FDC 173161: magnesium 156 MG, selenium 25.5 UG, thiamin 0.436 MG per 100 g
    USDA FoodData Central, SR Legacy 2018, FDC 173161 (Rice crackers) · checked 2026-09-30
  3. rcrk-daily-r5-10 · USDA FNDDS dataset
    Crackers, rice, FNDDS code 54319000, fdc_id 2708163: 1 cracker 3 g; Quantity not specified 18 g; 1 cup, NFS 40 g; Sodium 233 MG per 100 g
    USDA FNDDS, food code 54319000 (FDC 2708163) · checked 2026-09-30
  4. rcrk-daily-r5-03 · randomized controlled trial
    In trial 1, of ingestion of rice crackers, the incremental area under the curves of glucose (IAUCglc) and insulin (IAUCins) in RS group was significantly lower than in the control group.
    Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, 2020 · checked 2026-09-30
  5. rcrk-daily-r5-01 · randomized controlled trial
    Lampang's Crispy Rice Cracker (68 g, high-GI group, n = 10), each consumed alongside their standard breakfast ... In the high-GI dessert group, the abundance of Collinsella and Bifidobacterium decreased compared to the low- and medium-GI groups, while Roseburia and Ruminococcus showed slight increases.
    Nutrients, 2024 · checked 2026-09-30
  6. rcrk-daily-r5-02 · randomized controlled trial
    Healthy participants or those with T2DM consumed either buckwheat or rice crackers. Blood samples were collected at baseline and 15, 30, 45, 60, 120 and 180minutes after consumption. ... Interestingly, changes in these hormones did not lead to changes in post-prandial glucose, insulin or C-peptide concentrations.
    Metabolism, 2013 · checked 2026-09-30
  7. rcrk-daily-r5-05 · cross-sectional
    In a nationally representative sample of the US civilian, noninstitutionalized population, fish (adults), rice (children), and rice cakes/crackers (adolescents) had the largest associations with urinary DMA. For MMA, rice beverage/milk (adults) and rice cakes/crackers (children, adolescents) had the largest associations.
    PLoS One, 2014 · checked 2026-09-30
  8. rcrk-daily-r5-07 · case report
    In addition, 3 of 8 other kinds of processed rice crackers were contaminated by wheat protein, with levels ranging from 0.26 to 1.13 microg/g. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 13.5 microg of wheat protein can elicit a systemic adverse reaction in highly sensitive, wheat allergic individuals.
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 2004 · checked 2026-09-30
  9. rcrk-daily-r5-04 · randomized controlled trial
    It also took three months for the patient-reported masticatory ability to improve for cubic rice crackers, hard rice crackers, and dry squid and to show a difference between the RD and CD groups.
    J Prosthodont Res, 2022 · checked 2026-09-30
  10. rcrk-daily-r5-08 · cross-sectional
    One hundred and five patients with dysphagia were included. ... 92.4% of the patients ate the rice cracker without aspiration.
    Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 2018 · checked 2026-09-30
  11. rcrk-daily-r5-09 · cross-sectional
    Food acceptability was evaluated from the difficulty experienced in chewing apples, grilled beef, and hard rice crackers. ... Approximately 15% of participants were included in the compromised food acceptability group.
    J Oral Rehabil, 2014 · checked 2026-09-30
  12. rcrk-daily-r5-12 · cross-sectional
    Satisfaction with masticatory function and food acceptability (apples, grilled beef, and hard rice crackers) were evaluated using questionnaires. ... Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the number of foods that could be eaten without difficulty was the most important explanatory variable for dissatisfaction with masticatory function (P < .01).
    Int J Prosthodont, 2007 · checked 2026-09-30

Review. Reviewed on 2026-09-30 for evidence level, dose and population context, and claims a reader could misread. Bioma Learn has no human medical reviewer at this time, and we say so rather than invent one. Methodology. This is information, not medical advice.