BiomaLearnFoodsNutrientsGuidesAnswersEvidence

Rice: the arsenic question, and the water you pour away

Every extra daily serving of white rice went with 11 percent more type 2 diabetes across seven cohorts and 352,384 people. Read the next line before you act on that. The link held in Asian populations, where people ate three or four servings a day, and it did not hold in Western ones eating one or two a week, and the gap between the two was itself statistically significant. Rice also has no single glycaemic index. Across varieties it runs from 48 to 93, which is the distance between a lentil and a slice of white bread, so the word on the bag tells you very little. The other half of this page is arsenic, and the one federal number in the United States is not about you. It is 100 parts per billion, it covers infant rice cereal and nothing else, and it is guidance rather than a binding limit.

Every statement here is tied to a source. The badge says what kind of evidence stands behind it: A is a meta-analysis or systematic review, E is the position of an expert body without its own analysis. How we verify →

The numbers, per 100 g

USDA entrykcalProteinCarbsFiber
Rice1340.5 g5 g0 g
Rice, brown, long-grain, cooked1232.74 g25.6 g1.6 g
Rice, white, glutinous, un, cooked972.02 g21.1 g1 g
Rice, white, long-grain, parboiled, dry3747.51 g80.9 g1.8 g
Rice, white, long-grain, precooked or instant1242.18 g26.8 g0.6 g
Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked1302.69 g28.2 g0.4 g
Rice, white, long-grain, regular, raw3657.13 g80 g1.3 g
Rice, black, unenriched, raw3617.57 g77.2 g4.18 g
Rice, brown, long grain, unenriched, raw3687.25 g76.7 g3.02 g
Rice, brown, medium-grain, cooked (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program)1122.32 g23.5 g1.8 g
Rice, brown, medium-grain, raw (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program)3627.5 g76.2 g3.4 g
Rice, brown, parboiled, cooked, UNCLE BENS1473.09 g31.3 g1.7 g

These are the USDA entries that are rice, not foods made from it. Follow a name for the full profile and per-portion figures. Showing 12 of 32 USDA entries that are rice; the rest differ only in cut, pack or preparation.

How much is actually in it

What a real portion looks like

What your body absorbs

What cooking and storage change

What it does to your health

What people believe that the data does not support

Who this works differently for

What is still unknown

The bottom line

Rinse it. Across fifteen studies the cheapest step removed the most arsenic, ahead of parboiling, and both of those beat pressure cooking, microwaving and steaming. Then decide what to do with the water. Cooked in plenty of water you drain away, rice keeps 60 percent of its folate, 75 percent of its thiamin and 85 percent of its potassium. Cooked in water it absorbs, the same grain keeps 70, 80 and 95. Draining is the better move for arsenic and the worse move for vitamins, and nobody has run the study that tells you which trade is worth more. Cooking also adds things. In 106 matched samples from Bangladesh, barium rose by 241 nanograms per gram and strontium by 679, straight out of the water, so raw rice and cooked rice are two different foods. Two groups get far more rice than they chose. Children who went gluten free after a coeliac diagnosis had four times the arsenic in their urine six months later, 3.3 micrograms per litre before and 13.6 after, because rice is what replaces wheat. Three in ten rice-based baby foods tested worldwide sat above the international maximum. Europe reassessed inorganic arsenic in 2024 and reported margins of exposure of 2.0 to 0.4 for average adults, which means the calculated safety gap has closed. One popular claim we cannot repeat. Nobody has measured iron or zinc absorption from rice itself with isotopes, at any phytate level, so we cannot tell you that the phytate in brown rice blocks your minerals. It might. It has not been measured. Red yeast rice is a different product from the grain, and Europe allowed its cholesterol claim and then revoked it, putting monacolins under restricted substances on safety grounds rather than for any doubt about the effect.

Sources

  1. rice-e-03 · systematic review
    Based on a glucose reference value of 100, the observed glycaemic index values for rice varieties ranged from 48 to 93, while the insulinaemic index ranged from 39 to 95.
    Boers et al., British Journal of Nutrition, 2015 · checked 2026-09-21
  2. rice-e-06 · longitudinal observational biomonitoring
    Barium and strontium significantly increased after cooking (mean differences of 241 ng/g and 679 ng/g, respectively), while cesium, selenium, molybdenum, and nickel significantly decreased (mean differences of -12 ng/g, -19 ng/g, -202 ng/g, and -125 ng/g, respectively).
    Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2026 · checked 2026-09-21
  3. rice-e-09 · meta-analytic review of composition data
    Consequently, such substantial geographical variation reflects bioavailability as well as speciation of arsenic in rice.
    Journal of Environmental Management, 2019 · checked 2026-09-21
  4. rice-e-15 · final rule, agency response to comment
    Because the weight of the cooked rice depends on the amount of water used in the preparation, the amount required to make one reference amount in cooked form can vary widely.
    Food Labeling: Serving Sizes of Foods That Can Reasonably Be Consumed At One Eating Occasion, FDA, FR Doc. 2016-11865 · checked 2026-09-21
  5. rice-e-10 · controlled clinical trial with stable isotopes
    In iron-depleted women, iron absorption from FePP-fortified extruded rice cofortified with ZnSO4 was 1.6-fold (95% CI: 1.4-, 1.9-fold) that of rice cofortified with ZnO.
    Journal of Nutrition, 2017 · checked 2026-09-21
  6. rice-e-11 · randomised controlled trial with stable isotopes
    In all participants, the rice group, and the buns group, nonheme iron intake was 7.2±1.6, 5.9±0.6, and 8.4±1.2 mg, respectively; mean 57FeSO4 absorption rate was 22.2%±9.6%, 22.2%±10.6%, and 22.2%±8.9%, respectively
    Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2019 · checked 2026-09-21
  7. rice-e-05 · systematic review and meta-analysis
    Furthermore, based on the subgroup analysis the overall rank order of cooking methods in the rice was rinsed > parboiling > Kateh > high-pressure, microwave, and steaming.
    Int J Environ Health Res, 2024 · checked 2026-09-21
  8. rice-e-01 · meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies
    In the total population, the dose-response meta-analysis indicated that for each serving per day increment of white rice intake, the relative risk of type 2 diabetes was 1.11 (1.08 to 1.14) (P for linear trend<0.001).
    Hu et al., BMJ, 2012 · checked 2026-09-21
  9. rice-e-02 · meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies
    The pooled relative risk was 1.55 (95% confidence interval 1.20 to 2.01) comparing the highest with the lowest category of white rice intake in Asian populations, whereas the corresponding relative risk was 1.12 (0.94 to 1.33) in Western populations (P for interaction=0.038).
    Hu et al., BMJ, 2012 · checked 2026-09-21
  10. rice-e-04 · systematic review, narrative synthesis of cited trials
    After three heating/cooling cycles, the RS content of legumes, cereals and tubers increased from 4·18, 1·86 and 1·51 % to 8·16, 3·25 and 2·51 %, respectively, on a DM basis. However, a ten times greater RS content in rice varieties had no effect on the GI
    Boers et al., British Journal of Nutrition, 2015 · checked 2026-09-21
  11. rice-e-12 · regulatory decision, EU health claims register
    POL-HC-8510 Vibigaba (germinated brown rice) Contributes to the maintenance of normal blood glucose levels. -/- Non-authorised
    EU Register on nutrition and health claims, European Commission, знімок 2026-09-21 · checked 2026-09-21
  12. rice-e-13 · regulatory decision, EU health claims register
    POL-HC-6421 Monascus purpureous (red yeast rice) Monacolin K from red yeast rice contributes to the maintenance of normal blood cholesterol levels Following the amendment of Annex III of Regulation (EC) 1925/2006 as regards monacolins from red yeast rice, by which monacolins have been placed in Part B of Annex III, under ‘Restricted substances’, the use of monacolins from red yeast rice at levels of 3mg and more per portion of the product recommended for daily consumption is prohibited. Consequently, the health claim on monacolin K from red yeast rice related to the contribution to the maintenance of normal blood cholesterol levels, under the daily intake of 10 mg of monacolin K from red yeast rice (Entry ID: 1648, 1700), has been revoked from the Union list of permitted health claims with Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/2041. Revoked
    EU Register on nutrition and health claims, European Commission, знімок 2026-09-21, запис POL-HC-6421 · checked 2026-09-21
  13. rice-e-07 · prospective cohort study
    After 6 months on a GFD, there was a significant increase in the median urinary arsenic concentration (3.3 µg/L vs 13.6 µg/L, P = 0.000004).
    American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2025 · checked 2026-09-21
  14. rice-e-08 · scoping review of composition data
    For As, the highest median was found in mixed fish (0.165 mg/kg) and rice mixes (0.048 mg/kg), with 89% and 30% of items exceeding the As ML, respectively.
    Nutrition Reviews, 2026 · checked 2026-09-21
  15. rice-e-16 · agency guidance
    The action level for inorganic arsenic in infant rice cereals that FDA considers achievable with the use of such practices is 100 microgram per kilogram (µg/kg), or 100 parts per billion (ppb)
    Guidance for Industry: Action Level for Inorganic Arsenic in Rice Cereals for Infants, FDA, серпень 2020 · checked 2026-09-21
  16. rice-e-14 · guideline, research priorities
    During discussions in the WHO technical meeting on rice fortification, the WHO guideline development groups and the external review group highlighted the limited evidence available in some knowledge areas, meriting further research on the fortification of rice
    Guideline: Fortification of Rice with Vitamins and Minerals as a Public Health Strategy, WHO 2018 · checked 2026-09-21
  17. rice-e-17 · agency risk assessment
    In adults, the margins of exposure range between 2.0 and 0.4 for average consumers and between 0.9 and 0.2 for high consumers, respectively.
    Update of the risk assessment of inorganic arsenic in food, EFSA CONTAM Panel, 2024, plain language summary · checked 2026-09-21

Review. This page predates our review log, so no review date is shown; it is queued for a fresh review. Last updated 2026-09-22. Bioma Learn has no human medical reviewer at this time, and we say so rather than invent one. Methodology. This is information, not medical advice.