BiomaLearnFoodsNutrientsGuidesAnswersEvidence

Figs: one trial inside a shelf of kiwifruit trials

Figs are sold for digestion, and digestion is the one place the evidence points. A network meta-analysis of 12 randomised trials in adults with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome put natural fruits, naming kiwis and figs, ahead of dietary fibre for abdominal pain by 0.23 points (95% CrI 0.01 to 0.45), and rated that comparison high certainty. Read the node rather than the headline. Fruits are ranked through the network rather than tested against fibre head to head, and figs share that node with kiwifruit, which supplies most of the trials. A wider review of foods for chronic constipation, 23 studies and 1714 participants, found fruit ahead of psyllium by 0.36 bowel movements a week (0.25 to 0.48) among the 232 people in that comparison. Kiwifruit carried the estimate, prunes showed no difference against psyllium, and figs contributed a single trial out of the 23. That one trial is a decent one. In 80 Korean adults with functional constipation, eight weeks of Ficus carica paste shortened colon transit time and improved stool type and abdominal discomfort against placebo. The report gives significance without the size of the change, and the paste was prepared for the trial rather than bought in a shop.

Every statement here is tied to a source. The badge says what kind of evidence stands behind it: A is a meta-analysis or systematic review, E is the position of an expert body without its own analysis. How we verify →

The numbers, per 100 g

USDA entrykcalProteinCarbsFiber
Figs, canned, heavy syrup pack, solids and liquids880.38 g22.9 g2.2 g
Figs, canned, light syrup pack, solids and liquids690.39 g17.9 g1.8 g
Figs, canned, water pack, solids and liquids530.4 g14 g2.2 g
Figs, dried, stewed1071.42 g27.6 g4.2 g
Figs, dried, uncooked2493.3 g63.9 g9.8 g
Figs, raw740.75 g19.2 g2.9 g
Figs, canned, extra heavy syrup pack, solids and liquids1070.38 g27.9 g— g

These are the USDA entries that are fig, not foods made from it. Follow a name for the full profile and per-portion figures.

What a real portion looks like

What your body absorbs

What it does to your health

Safety, limits and interactions

What is still unknown

The bottom line

Everything else the fruit is sold for came back flat, and it came back flat at a portion larger than anyone eats by habit. Two five-week crossover trials fed 120 g of dried figs a day. In 88 American adults of about 56 years, that portion raised reported calcium and potassium intake (P < 0.05), while the minerals measured in their blood were nearly the same on both diets. Five weeks is short for mineral status, the participants were already replete, and intake came from 24-hour recalls. In 83 adults aged 30 to 75 whose LDL cholesterol ran between 100 and 189 mg/dl, the same portion left LDL, HDL and triglycerides unchanged after correction for multiple testing. Total cholesterol drifted upward (p = 0.02) in a pattern that showed up only in the arm that ate figs second, over five weeks, which is short for lipids. The portion did do one thing reliably. Sugar intake climbed from 23.4 to 32.2 percent of calories (p < 0.0001) and soluble fibre from 8.2 to 12.6 g a day, measured by recall in that trial at a portion nobody eats daily by choice. Figs also do not arrive on top of a diet. In those same 88 adults the daily 120 g was estimated to displace 23 percent of grain products, 10 percent of dairy and 5 percent of vegetables. That displacement is calculated from recalls rather than observed, and the matching figure of 168 percent for beverages shows how rough the arithmetic turns at the edges. Blood sugar is where dried fruit and fig extract go opposite ways. Fifty-five adults with a high BMI and at least one further cardiometabolic risk factor ate three quarters of a cup a day of mixed dried plums, figs, dates and raisins for four weeks. Fasting glucose rose by 0.08 mmol/l (95% CI 0.005 to 0.16, P = 0.038) against a carbohydrate-matched snack. Figs were one of four dried fruits in that mix, and the comparison was against another carbohydrate snack rather than against nothing. A fig fruit extract standardised for abscisic acid moved the other way, cutting the glycemic index of a glucose drink by 25 percent (P = 0.001) at a 200 mg dose in 10 healthy adults aged 18 to 45. That is a concentrated extract stirred into a sugar drink, in ten people, and it says nothing about eating a fig. Who should be careful has one precise answer here. Among 54 patients from an allergy screening programme who were sensitised to the ornamental weeping fig, Ficus benjamina, skin tests came back positive to fresh fig in 83 percent and to dried fig in 37 percent. Kiwi followed at 28 percent and papaya at 22 percent, and seven of those patients had systemic reactions. Those are allergy clinic patients, so the percentages describe a sensitised group and not a risk for everyone. If the houseplant has ever given you trouble, treat the fruit with care. Past that, and past what a 120 g portion does to the sugar in a day, we found no trial of figs in pregnancy, in children, or against any medicine.

Sources

  1. figs-r5-06 · randomised crossover trial
    The estimated displacement suggests that eating figs resulted in the elimination of 4% of desserts, 5% of vegetables, 10% of dairy products, 23% of grain products and 168% of beverages from other sources that participants would otherwise consume.
    Public Health Nutr, 2015 · checked 2026-09-24
  2. figs-r5-05 · randomised crossover trial
    Nevertheless, data on mineral levels in the body gathered by means of biochemical analyses from blood samples were nearly the same for both the figs-added and the participants' standard diet.
    Public Health Nutr, 2015 · checked 2026-09-24
  3. figs-r5-01 · network meta-analysis of RCTs
    Network meta-analysis results demonstrated natural fruits were more effective than dietary fiber in alleviating abdominal pain (MD, -0.23 [95% credible interval (CrI), -0.45 to -0.01]; high-certainty evidence, category 1). ... Natural fruits, such as kiwis and figs, represent the most efficacious functional foods for managing IBS-C.
    Nutr Rev, 2026 · checked 2026-09-24
  4. figs-r5-02 · systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fruits resulted in higher stool frequency than psyllium (MD: +0.36 bowel movements [BM]/week, [0.25-0.48], n = 232), kiwifruits in particular (MD: +0.36 BM/week, [0.24-0.48], n = 192); there was no difference for prunes compared with psyllium.
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2024 · checked 2026-09-24
  5. figs-r5-04 · randomised controlled trial
    F. carica paste supplementation was associated with a significant reduction in colon transit time and a significant improvement in stool type and abdominal discomfort compared with the placebo.
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr, 2016 · checked 2026-09-24
  6. figs-r5-07 · randomised crossover trial
    Low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations did not differ between usual and figs-added diets (Bonferroni-corrected p > 0.017), while total cholesterol tended to increase with fig consumption (p = 0.02).
    Ann Nutr Metab, 2011 · checked 2026-09-24
  7. figs-r5-09 · randomised crossover trial
    Compared with the control, dried fruit increased mean fasting glucose (0·08 mmol/l, 95 % CI 0·005, 0·16; P = 0·038).
    Br J Nutr, 2020 · checked 2026-09-24
  8. figs-r5-11 · randomised crossover trial
    Test beverages containing 200 mg FFE-50× and 1200 mg FFE-10× significantly reduced GI values by -25% (P = 0.001) and -24% (P = 0.002), respectively.
    Nutrients, 2019 · checked 2026-09-24
  9. figs-r5-08 · randomised crossover trial
    Sugar intake increased from 23.4 ± 6.5 to 32.2 ± 6.3% of kcal in the figs-added diet (p < 0.0001).
    Ann Nutr Metab, 2011 · checked 2026-09-24
  10. figs-r5-10 · prevalence study
    Sensitization to FB was specifically associated with positive skin tests to fresh fig (83%), dried fig (37%), kiwi fruit (28%), papaya (22%), avocado (19%), banana (15%), and pineapple (10%) (n = 54).
    Clin Exp Allergy, 2004 · checked 2026-09-24
  11. figs-r5-03 · systematic review and meta-analysis
    We included 23 studies (17 RCTs, 6 uncontrolled; 1714 participants): kiwifruit (n = 7), high-mineral water (n = 4), prunes (n = 2), rye bread (n = 2), mango, fig, cereal, oat bran, yoghurt, water supplementation, prune juice, high-fibre diet, no-fibre diet (n = 1).
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2024 · checked 2026-09-24

Review. Reviewed on 2026-09-24 for evidence level, dose and population context, and claims a reader could misread. Bioma Learn has no human medical reviewer at this time, and we say so rather than invent one. Methodology. This is information, not medical advice.