BiomaLearnFoodsNutrition factsNutrientsGuidesAnswersEvidence

Passion fruit: the research is about the peel, not the pulp

The strongest evidence on this page was produced by a part of the plant most people throw away. In a network meta-analysis of 23 randomized trials in 2,455 people with hand, hip or knee osteoarthritis, purple passion fruit peel extract ranked first of 21 supplements for WOMAC pain, with a mean difference of -9.2 points (95% CI -16.0 to -2.3), on evidence the authors themselves graded low and on a small number of trials. A second review, covering 69 trials of 20 supplements, put the peel extract among 7 with a large short-term effect on pain, and found that no supplement held a clinically important effect at medium or long term. Its authors call the overall quality of evidence very low and point out that the biggest effects come from the supplements with the fewest studies. None of this was tested as fruit on a plate. No agency has set a safe upper amount for the peel extract or the peel flour, the only toxicity data are from rats, and the only human safety finding is an absence of reported harm in one 4-week trial. Passion fruit is also among the fruits whose allergens cross-react with latex. What the fruit itself reliably brings is fiber: 10.4 g per 3.5 oz (100 g), 37 percent of the Daily Value, from a single USDA legacy record with no Foundation samples behind it, so the table carries no measured spread. Vitamin C sits at 30 mg per 3.5 oz (100 g) there and at 23 mg in the UK table. That 100 g is not a portion. USDA counts one fruit as 18 g of edible flesh and a cup as 236 g, which is about 13 fruits.

Every statement here is tied to a source. The badge says what kind of evidence stands behind it: A is a meta-analysis or systematic review, E is the position of an expert body without its own analysis. How we verify →

The numbers, per 3.5 oz (100 g)

USDA entrykcalProteinFatCarbsFiber
Passion-fruit, (granadilla), purple, raw972.2 g0.7 g23.4 g10.4 g

These are the USDA entries that are passion fruit, not foods made from it; they differ in cut, part, pack or preparation. Linked names have a page with the full profile and per-portion figures.

As people eat it, per 3.5 oz (100 g)

As eatenkcalProteinFatCarbsFiber
Passion fruit, raw972.2 g0.7 g23.4 g10.4 g

USDA Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies (FNDDS, release 2024-10-31): passion fruit as it is prepared and served, from the recipes behind the national dietary survey, rather than a single laboratory sample.

How much is actually in it

What a real portion looks like

What your body absorbs

What it does to your health

Safety, limits and interactions

What people believe that the data does not support

Who this works differently for

What is still unknown

The bottom line

The human trials all test a product. In 33 adults with knee osteoarthritis, 150 mg a day of purple passion fruit peel extract for 60 days brought self-reported drops of 18.6 percent in pain and 19.2 percent in the composite WOMAC score, with no confidence intervals in the abstract and 33 people in the trial. A 4-week trial of the same 150 mg dose in adults with asthma lowered the prevalence of wheeze, cough and shortness of breath (P < .05) while FEV1 did not move. The abstract never says how many people were randomized, and no trial on this page tested that extract against or alongside an asthma treatment. In 43 people with type 2 diabetes, 30 g a day of yellow passion fruit peel flour for two months shifted fasting glucose (P = 0.000) and glycated hemoglobin (P = 0.032) and lowered HOMA IR (P = 0.005). The abstract reports a difference rather than a direction for the first two. The study had no placebo group and no randomization, each volunteer served as their own control, and the abstract gives no effect sizes. The skin study used neither peel nor pulp. It gave 82 Japanese women aged 30 to 59 a daily drink with 10 mg of piceatannol from passion fruit seeds for 8 weeks and measured a rise in facial skin hydration against placebo, again with no effect sizes reported. Blending is the one thing tested on the fruit: mixed with mango and matched at 25 g of sugar, the blended meal gave a glycemic index of 26.30 against 42.56 for the same fruit eaten whole in adults with obesity (p = 0.044), in 21 people, with standard deviations almost as wide as the means and passion fruit never fed on its own. On caution the page is thin, and pretending otherwise would be dishonest. For the peel products there is no ceiling. No human study of the extract ran longer than 8 weeks, and the only toxicity figure is from rats: a review reports no toxic effect of an unripe peel extract given by mouth at 550 mg per kg, which does not translate into a safe human dose. The one human safety finding for the extract is a null: no participant in that 4-week asthma trial reported an adverse effect, which is an absence of reported harm in one small short study rather than a safety margin. In the peel flour study, those who dropped out did so because of the strong aftertaste and abdominal discomfort. Its volunteers stayed on glucose-lowering drugs at unchanged doses, the paper does not report low blood sugar episodes, and people with liver or kidney problems were excluded, so the flour was never tested in kidney disease or as a change to diabetes treatment. The fruit itself contains cyanogenic glycosides. In a survey cited by EFSA, cyanide was found in 2 of 5 passion fruit samples at 4.7 to 6.6 mg per kg, without saying whether pulp, seeds or whole fruit were tested. EFSA set an acute limit of 20 mcg of cyanide per kg of body weight. At the highest level found, a 132 lb (60 kg) adult would need about 6.3 oz (180 g) of fruit in one sitting to reach it, our arithmetic rather than an EFSA statement, and because the limit is per kg a child reaches it with proportionally less. In children in Australia and New Zealand, passion fruit made up about 6 percent and under 5 percent of long-term dietary cyanide exposure, far behind linseed bread, linseed and cassava chips. The best-known warning is cross-reaction. Among 136 patients with documented immediate-type latex allergy, 69.1 percent carried fruit-specific IgE, and passion fruit was among the fruits whose allergens cross-reacted with latex in the laboratory, although that is serology rather than a food challenge and the authors say such tests predict food allergy poorly. The only pregnancy study of passion fruit we found is in rats given an extract, and there are no data in pregnant women or in children for the peel extract or flour. The pregnancy warning on the NIH passionflower page concerns a different species, the medicinal herb, not the fruit. We found no interaction study with any drug. If a search points you at an English norovirus outbreak that hit at least 240 diners, read it carefully. The oyster, passion fruit jelly and lavender dish carried odds of illness 7.0 times higher (95% CI 1.1 to 45.2), an interval spanning a factor of forty, and odds rather than risk, and the investigators traced the source to the oyster supply.

Questions about passion fruit, answered from the trials

Related foods

More from the same food group (fruits and fruit juices)

Sources

  1. hf2-pfru-1 · EFSA scientific opinion
    Table 16 Total cyanide contents in food commodities containing cyanogenic glycosides a (FSANZ, 2014 ) ... Passion fruit 2/5 4.7–6.6 4
    EFSA CONTAM Panel, Evaluation of the health risks related to the presence of cyanogenic glycosides in foods other than raw apricot kernels, EFSA Journal 2019;17(4):5662 · checked 2026-10-08
  2. pfru-r5-11 · USDA FoodData Central SR Legacy and CoFID 2021, dataset
    Passion-fruit, (granadilla), purple, raw (FDC 169108, SR Legacy, Fruits and Fruit Juices): fiber 10.4 g per 100 g = 37% DV, vitamin C 30 mg = 33% DV, riboflavin 0.13 mg = 10% DV. No Foundation Foods sample exists for this fruit, so USDA carries no measured spread. CoFID 2021 Passion fruit, flesh and pips [14-178]: vitamin C 23 mg, riboflavin 0.12 mg.
    USDA FoodData Central, SR Legacy, FDC 169108, and CoFID 2021 (Public Health England, OGL v3.0) · checked 2026-09-24
  3. pfru-r5-12 · USDA FNDDS, dataset
    Passion fruit, raw (FNDDS, FDC 2709248, WWEIA Other fruits and fruit salads): 1 fruit = 18 g, 1 cup = 236 g. Portion nutrient values are recalculated from the 100 g record, not measured per portion. USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors Release 6 (2007) holds no method and no group for this fruit, and fiber is not among its 26 nutrients.
    USDA FNDDS, FDC 2709248, WWEIA category Other fruits and fruit salads · checked 2026-09-24
  4. pfru-r5-07 · comparative clinical trial, crossover meals
    Nutrient extraction was shown to significantly lower GI, compared to eating fruit whole, in subjects with obesity (raspberry/mango: 25.43 ± 18.20 vs. 44.85 ± 20.18, p = 0.034 and passion fruit/mango (26.30 ± 25.72 vs. 42.56 ± 20.64, p = 0.044).
    Nutrients, 2020 · checked 2026-09-24
  5. pfru-r5-01 · network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    In the WOMAC pain score, the SUCRA of passion fruit peel extract was 91% (mean difference [MD]: -9.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: [-16.0, -2.3]), followed by methylsulfonylmethane (89%), undenatured type II collagen (87%), collagen (84%), and Lanconone (82%).
    J Integr Med, 2025 · checked 2026-09-24
  6. pfru-r5-03 · randomized controlled trial
    At 60 days, reductions of 18.6%, 18%, 19.6%, and 19.2% in pain, stiffness, physical function, and composite WOMAC score, respectively, were self-reported in the PFP group.
    Nutr Res, 2010 · checked 2026-09-24
  7. pfru-r5-04 · randomized controlled trial
    The prevalence of wheeze, cough, as well as shortness of breath was reduced significantly in group treated with PFP extract (P < .05), whereas the placebo caused no significant improvement.
    Nutr Res, 2008 · checked 2026-09-24
  8. pfru-r5-08 · controlled clinical trial, non-randomized
    There was a significant difference in the fasting blood glucose values (P = 0.000) and glycated hemoglobin (P = 0.032) after supplementation. It was also seen a reduction in HOMA IR (P = 0.005) in the supplemented group, however it was not observed changes in insulin values for females.
    Nutr J, 2012 · checked 2026-09-24
  9. pfru-r5-09 · randomized controlled trial
    The piceatannol group exhibited a statistically significant increase in facial stratum corneum hydration compared to the placebo group.
    Front Nutr, 2026 · checked 2026-09-24
  10. ev-pfpg-02 · agency position
    Passionflower is likely safe when it's used as a flavoring in food.
    NIH National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, Passionflower, page updated April 2025 · checked 2026-10-07
  11. hf2-pfru-2 · EFSA scientific opinion
    The CONTAM Panel concludes that the ARfD of 20 μg CN/kg bw should be protective for acute effects of CN from CNGs, regardless of the dietary source.
    EFSA CONTAM Panel, Evaluation of the health risks related to the presence of cyanogenic glycosides in foods other than raw apricot kernels, EFSA Journal 2019;17(4):5662 · checked 2026-10-08
  12. hf2-pfru-4 · narrative review
    In vivo acute and subacute toxicity studies indicate that oral administration of the ethanol extract of unripen fruit peel of P. edulis at the dose of 550 mg/kg had no toxic effect on the rats.
    He X et al., Passiflora edulis: An Insight Into Current Researches on Phytochemistry and Pharmacology, Frontiers in Pharmacology 2020;11:617 · checked 2026-10-08
  13. hf2-pfru-6 · uncontrolled clinical trial
    People who did not remain until the end abandoned the study due to the strong aftertaste of the flour and abdominal discomfort.
    Nutr J, 2012 · checked 2026-10-08
  14. pfru-r5-05 · randomized controlled trial
    No adverse effect was reported by any of study participants.
    Nutr Res, 2008 · checked 2026-09-24
  15. ev-pfpg-01 · agency position
    Passionflower should not be used during pregnancy as it may induce uterine contractions and possibly lead to other problems.
    NIH National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, Passionflower, page updated April 2025 · checked 2026-10-07
  16. hf2-pfru-8 · agency position
    Passionflower should not be used during pregnancy as it may induce uterine contractions and possibly lead to other problems. ... Passionflower is likely safe when it's used as a flavoring in food.
    NIH National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, Passionflower, page updated April 2025 · checked 2026-10-08
  17. pfru-r5-10 · case-control study
    The case-control study demonstrated increased risk of illness in those who ate from a special 'tasting menu' and in particular an oyster, passion fruit jelly and lavender dish (odds ratio 7·0, 95% confidence interval 1·1-45·2).
    Epidemiol Infect, 2012 · checked 2026-09-24
  18. ev-pfpg-03 · case-control study
    Cross-reacting IgE antibodies recognizing latex and fruit allergens (papaya, avocado, banana, chestnut, passion fruit, fig, melon, mango, kiwi, pineapple, peach, and tomato) were demonstrated by RAST-inhibition tests.
    Allergy, 1997 · checked 2026-10-07
  19. ev-pfpg-04 · agency position
    While most people's immune systems can usually fight off the effects of foodborne illness, children, older adults, pregnant women, and people with weakened immune systems (such as transplant patients and individuals with HIV/AIDS, cancer, or diabetes) risk serious illnesses or even death from drinking untreated juices.
    US FDA, What You Need to Know about Juice Safety, content current as of 03/05/2024 · checked 2026-10-07
  20. hf2-pfru-3 · EFSA scientific opinion
    In the non‐adult groups (in Australia 2–16 years, in New Zealand 5–14 years), linseed‐containing bread contributed 37% and 24% to chronic exposure in Australia and New Zeeland, respectively. Corresponding values were 26% and 32% for linseed, < 5% and 7% for cooked cassava, 15% and 22% for cassava chips, 6% and < 5% for each apple juice and passion fruit.
    EFSA CONTAM Panel, Evaluation of the health risks related to the presence of cyanogenic glycosides in foods other than raw apricot kernels, EFSA Journal 2019;17(4):5662 · checked 2026-10-08
  21. hf2-pfru-7 · uncontrolled clinical trial
    The study excluded patients considered unfit during the interview and/or physical examination, which showed changes in laboratory tests such as: liver and renal dysfunction, cardiac severe changes, alcoholism and those who changed diet, medical treatment or physical activity during the study. ... The drugs dosage was not changed during the study.
    Nutr J, 2012 · checked 2026-10-08
  22. pfru-r5-06 · case-control study
    Fruit-specific IgE antibodies were detected in 69.1% of serum samples. Cross-reacting IgE antibodies recognizing latex and fruit allergens (papaya, avocado, banana, chestnut, passion fruit, fig, melon, mango, kiwi, pineapple, peach, and tomato) were demonstrated by RAST-inhibition tests.
    Allergy, 1997 · checked 2026-09-24
  23. ev-pfpg-05 · animal study
    Pregnant rats received oral supplementation with a passion fruit extract of defined polyphenolic composition during the last week of gestation and the first week of lactation.
    Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 2026 · checked 2026-10-07
  24. hf2-pfru-5 · narrative review
    More importantly, clinical trial on P. edulis efficacy and safety are very scarce to support claims of efficacy.
    He X et al., Passiflora edulis: An Insight Into Current Researches on Phytochemistry and Pharmacology, Frontiers in Pharmacology 2020;11:617 · checked 2026-10-08
  25. hf2-pfru-9 · animal study
    Pregnant rats received oral supplementation with a passion fruit extract of defined polyphenolic composition during the last week of gestation and the first week of lactation.
    Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 2026 · checked 2026-10-08
  26. pfru-r5-02 · meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Of 20 supplements investigated in 69 eligible studies, 7 (collagen hydrolysate, passion fruit peel extract, Curcuma longa extract, Boswellia serrata extract, curcumin, pycnogenol and L-carnitine) demonstrated large (effect size >0.80) and clinically important effects for pain reduction at short term...No supplements were identified with clinically important effects on pain reduction at long term.
    Br J Sports Med, 2018 · checked 2026-09-24

Review. Reviewed on 2026-10-08 for evidence level, dose and population context, and claims a reader could misread. Bioma Learn has no human medical reviewer at this time, and we say so rather than invent one. Methodology. This is information, not medical advice.