BiomaLearnFoodsNutrition factsNutrientsGuidesAnswersEvidence

Lentils and quinoa: pulses moved LDL a little, quinoa's weight trials disagree

Across 38 trials in 2,095 adults, eating whole pulses at a median 130 g a day for a median 6 weeks lowered LDL cholesterol by 5.4 mg/dL (95% CI -7.3 to -3.1; metric: 0.14 mmol/L, -0.19 to -0.08), at moderate to high certainty overall but with a thin lentil subgroup. The authors asked for more trials on lentils specifically. A second meta-analysis, of 21 trials in 940 people, found that about one serving of pulses a day gave 0.75 lb (0.34 kg) more weight loss over a median 6 weeks (95% CI -0.63 to -0.04), with beans, lentils, chickpeas and peas pooled together. Both effects are small and come from short trials. Quinoa has two meta-analyses that point in different directions. Across 7 small trials in 258 adults eating 0.53 to 1.8 oz (15 to 50 g) a day for 28 to 180 days, quinoa did not significantly change body weight (-1.2 lb (95% CI -6.7 to 4.3; metric: -0.54 kg, -3.05 to 1.97)) or BMI. An earlier pooling of 5 trials in 206 adults found 2.8 lb (1.26 kg) lost (95% CI -2.35 to -0.18) and total cholesterol down 6.86 mg/dL, and that analysis is itself built on few small trials. The trials so far are too few and too small to settle quinoa and weight either way.

Every statement here is tied to a source. The badge says what kind of evidence stands behind it: A is a meta-analysis or systematic review, E is the position of an expert body without its own analysis. How we verify →

We have no USDA entry for lentils | quinoa itself in this cohort. The evidence below stands on published studies rather than on a composition table, and we would rather say that than show you a number for something else.

How much is actually in it

What a real portion looks like

What your body absorbs

What cooking and storage change

What it does to your health

Safety, limits and interactions

What people believe that the data does not support

Who this works differently for

What is still unknown

The bottom line

Per 100 g dry, USDA samples put lentils at 7.2 mg iron, 3.9 mg zinc and 949 mg potassium against 4.5 mg, 2.8 mg and 551 mg in quinoa flour, which was sampled as flour and not as the whole seed. The UK table gives raw red lentils 25.6 g protein and 17.4 g fiber per 3.5 oz (100 g) against 13.8 g and 7.0 g for raw quinoa, at 311 and 309 calories, and it puts quinoa iron at 7.80 mg, above the US flour figure. Dry lentils held 16 g of resistant starch per 3.5 oz (100 g) in USDA samples, a value that cooking changes, and the dataset has no matching figure for quinoa. A cup of cooked lentils weighs 6.3 oz (180 g) in the US survey table and a cup of cooked quinoa 170 g. In a randomized crossover feeding trial in 18 adults, a 3.5 oz (98.5 g) serving of cooked lentils supplied 119 calories, 16 percent less than standard Atwater factors predict, a measurement made on lentils only. Iron is where lentils disappoint. In 19 non-pregnant women, 6 of them anemic, 2.20 percent of the iron in a 330 g lentil dal was absorbed against 23.6 percent from ferrous sulfate, in a single meal with high variability between women. In 65 resistance-trained young adults, muscle protein synthesis rose after exercise and a meal in every group, and the 11 who ate lentils did not differ significantly from those given egg whites, whole egg, salmon, pork or mycoprotein (P = 0.077), measured over 5 hours. The groups were small. Boiling legumes for 15 to 20 minutes and draining them keeps 85 percent of iron and zinc, 75 percent of potassium and 60 percent of folate by the USDA retention table, a factor for the food group, and that table has no factor for quinoa. Only 1.07 percent of 14,806 US adults ate quinoa on a recall day in 2013 to 2018, a single-day snapshot of habit. The EU looked at a claim that quinoa stimulates hair growth and did not authorize it. On safety, a scoping review of 47 mostly European studies found lentil, chickpea, pea and lupine allergies frequently implicated in severe allergic reactions, and it found no study on labeling or education for these allergens. In 12 studies of 1,066 people with celiac disease on a gluten-free diet, quinoa modestly lowered cholesterol and no study reported serious adverse events, in a narrative synthesis with few quinoa studies.

Each food on its own

Questions answered from the trials

Sources

  1. lnqn-r6-01 · food composition dataset
    Lentils, dry: Iron, Fe 7.158 MG range 6.52-7.94 n=8 · Zinc, Zn 3.863 MG range 3.04-4.34 n=8 · Potassium, K 948.9 MG range 909.0-968.0 n=8; Flour, quinoa: Iron, Fe 4.528 MG range 3.55-6.6 n=8 · Zinc, Zn 2.77 MG range 2.06-3.25 n=8 · Potassium, K 550.9 MG range 471.0-644.0 n=8
    USDA FoodData Central, Foundation Foods, release 2026-04-30 · checked 2026-10-02
  2. lnqn-r6-02 · food composition dataset
    Lentils, red, split, dried, raw, CoFID 13-657: Energy (kcal) 311 · Protein (g) 25.6 · AOAC fibre (g) 17.4 · Iron (mg) 7 · Zinc (mg) 3.3; Quinoa, raw, CoFID 14-843: Energy (kcal) 309 · Protein (g) 13.8 · AOAC fibre (g) 7.0 · Fat (g) 5.0 · Iron (mg) 7.80 · Zinc (mg) 3.3
    CoFID 2021, Public Health England, codes 13-657 and 14-843 · checked 2026-10-02
  3. lnqn-r6-03 · food composition dataset
    Lentils, dry: Resistant starch 16.0 G range 14.0-19.0 median 16.0 n=8
    USDA FoodData Central, Foundation Foods, release 2026-04-30 · checked 2026-10-02
  4. lnqn-r6-04 · food survey portion dataset
    FNDDS 41305000 Lentils, from dried, no added fat: 1 cup 180 g · 1 oz dry, yield after cooking 70 g · Quantity not specified 90 g; FNDDS 56204005 Quinoa, no added fat: 1 cup, cooked 170 g
    USDA FNDDS 2021-2023, codes 41305000 and 56204005 · checked 2026-10-02
  5. lnqn-r6-07 · randomized crossover trial
    The metabolizable energy of the lentils is 498 ± 17 kJ/serving (119 ± 4 kcal/serving) (serving mass = 98.5 g), which is 16.0% lower (p < 0.0001) and 13.6% lower (p = 0.003) than the ME calculated using Atwater General or Specific Factors, respectively.
    Nutrients, 2025 · checked 2026-10-02
  6. lnqn-r6-13 · cross-sectional survey
    The prevalence of barley, buckwheat and quinoa consumption among US adults were 0.36%, 0.04% and 1.07%, respectively.
    Nutrients, 2025 · checked 2026-10-02
  7. lnqn-r6-06 · randomized crossover trial
    We found that the mean iron absorption from the dal was 2.20% ± 3.40% and was significantly lower than the 23.6% ± 13.2% observed from the same iron load given as ferrous sulfate (P < 0.001).
    J Nutr, 2015 · checked 2026-10-02
  8. lnqn-r6-08 · randomized controlled trial
    MyoPS rates increased after exercise/food ingestion with no (temporal) differences between groups despite divergent plasma amino acid responses [Δ change in fractional synthesis rates (0-300 min); egg whites, 0.050 ± 0.013; egg, 0.051 ± 0.009; pork, 0.008 ± 0.008; salmon, 0.021 ± 0.014; lentils, 0.029 ± 0.012; mycoprotein, 0.041 ± 0.012% per hour (P = 0.077)].
    Am J Clin Nutr, 2026 · checked 2026-10-02
  9. lnqn-r6-05 · retention factor dataset
    USDA-RETN-R6:501 LEGUMES,CKD 15/20MIN,BOILED,DRAINED, group Legumes and Legume Products: folate_total_ug 60% retained, thiamin_mg 65%, potassium_mg 75%, magnesium_mg 80%, iron_mg 85%, zinc_mg 85%
    USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6, 2007, Retn_Code 501 · checked 2026-10-02
  10. lnqn-r6-09 · meta-analysis of RCTs
    In comparison between quinoa seed supplementation and placebo, our findings showed that quinoa seed supplementation did not have a significant effect on BMI (MD: -0.25; 95% CI: -0.98, 0.47; I2=0%, P = 0.998) and BW (MD: -0.54; 95% CI: -3.05, 1.97; I2=0%, P = 0.99), when compared with placebo.
    Curr Med Chem, 2024 · checked 2026-10-02
  11. lnqn-r6-10 · meta-analysis of RCTs
    The pooled result showed that quinoa seed supplementation significantly lowered the body weight (WMD: -1.26 kg, 95% CI: -2.35, -0.18, p = .02), waist circumference (WC) (WMD: -1.15 cm, 95% CI: -2.08, -0.21, p = .01), fat mass (FM) (WMD: -0.59%, 95% CI: -1.14, -0.03, p = .03), insulin serum level (WMD: -0.86 pmol/L, 95% CI: -13.38, -1.59, p = .01), triglyceride (TG) (WMD: -7.20 mg/dl, 95% CI: -9.52, -4.87, p < .001), total cholesterol (TC) (WMD: -6.86 mg/dl, 95% CI: -10.64, -3.08, p < .001), and low density lipoprotein (LDL) (WMD: -3.08 mg/dl, 95% CI: -5.13, -1.03, p = .003) levels.
    Phytother Res, 2021 · checked 2026-10-02
  12. lnqn-r6-12 · meta-analysis of RCTs
    The pooled analysis showed an overall significant weight reduction of -0.34 kg (95% CI: -0.63, -0.04 kg; P = 0.03) in diets containing dietary pulses (median intake of 132 g/d or ∼1 serving/d) compared with diets without a dietary pulse intervention over a median duration of 6 wk.
    Am J Clin Nutr, 2016 · checked 2026-10-02
  13. lnqn-r6-15 · scoping review
    Nonpriority legume allergies, which include chickpea, pea, lentil, and lupine, are frequently implicated in severe allergic reactions. ... Moreover, no studies addressed labeling or educational needs for these allergens.
    J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract, 2021 · checked 2026-10-02
  14. lnqn-r6-16 · regulatory register
    POL-HC-7865 Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) Stimulation of the hair bulb, favouring the growth of the hair Non-authorised
    EU Register on nutrition and health claims, claim POL-HC-7865, snapshot 2026-09-21 · checked 2026-10-02
  15. lnqn-r6-14 · systematic review
    Quinoa modestly lowered cholesterol, and amaranth enhanced growth and corrected trace element deficiencies in children. No study reported serious adverse events; adherence improved when prebiotics diversified the GFD.
    J Gastrointestin Liver Dis, 2026 · checked 2026-10-02
  16. lnqn-r6-11 · meta-analysis of RCTs
    Thirty-eight trials (52 trial comparisons, n=2095) with a median of 6 weeks and dose of 130 g/d (0.5-0.67 cup/d) showed that whole dietary pulses decreased low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (mean difference, -0.14 mmol/L [95% CI, -0.19 to -0.08]) ... Future studies on chickpeas, dried peas, and lentils are warranted.
    J Am Heart Assoc, 2026 · checked 2026-10-02

Review. Reviewed on 2026-10-02 for evidence level, dose and population context, and claims a reader could misread. Bioma Learn has no human medical reviewer at this time, and we say so rather than invent one. Methodology. This is information, not medical advice.