BiomaLearnFoodsNutrientsGuidesAnswersEvidence

Lentils: the iron on the label and the iron you get

A cup of cooked lentils lists 5.7 mg of iron, which is 32 percent of the Daily Value, and that number is close to meaningless on its own. When 19 women ate 330 g of lentil dal labelled so the iron could be traced, they absorbed 2.2 percent of it. The same iron load given as ferrous sulfate gave 23.6 percent. Multiply the two numbers and the iron actually taken up from that cup is on the order of a tenth of a milligram, which is an illustration rather than a measurement, and it is the right order of magnitude to carry in your head. Absorption rose as iron stores fell, measured as serum ferritin and hepcidin, so that single average hides a reader who is running low taking up more of it than a reader who is replete. The cholesterol story is real and it is borrowed. Half a cup of pulses a day lowered LDL by 0.14 mmol/L across 38 trials at moderate to high certainty, but the dose-response gradient was shown for beans, and the authors say trials on lentils are still needed. Lentils ride here on the class result, not on their own.

Every statement here is tied to a source. The badge says what kind of evidence stands behind it: A is a meta-analysis or systematic review, E is the position of an expert body without its own analysis. How we verify →

The numbers, per 100 g

USDA entrykcalProteinCarbsFiber
Lentils, mature seeds, cooked, boiled1169.02 g20.1 g7.9 g
Lentils, raw35224.6 g63.4 g10.7 g
Lentils, dry35123.6 g62.2 g— g
Lentils, mature seeds, cooked, boiled, with salt1149.02 g19.5 g7.9 g
Lentils, pink or red, raw35823.9 g63.1 g10.8 g
Lentils, sprouted, cooked, stir-fried, with salt1018.8 g21.2 g— g
Lentils, sprouted, cooked, stir-fried, without salt1018.8 g21.2 g— g
Lentils, sprouted, raw1068.96 g22.1 g— g

These are the USDA entries that are lentils, not foods made from it. Follow a name for the full profile and per-portion figures.

How much is actually in it

What a real portion looks like

What your body absorbs

What cooking and storage change

What it does to your health

What people believe that the data does not support

The bottom line

Keep the cooking water. The USDA retention table works on food groups rather than on lentils, and it gives legumes boiled and drained 75 percent of their iron against 80 percent when the water is used. That is a five point difference sitting next to a tenfold difference in absorption, so a dal that keeps its liquid is the better habit and a small one. What would move the bigger number, soaking, sprouting, or eating something acidic or vitamin C rich alongside, was not tested in that trial, so we cannot tell you how much any of it helps. For blood sugar the evidence is wide and loose. Forty-one trials found pulses lowered fasting glucose and insulin, and lowered glycosylated blood proteins, measured as HbA1c or fructosamine, when they sat inside a low glycaemic index diet. The authors state plainly that variation between studies was high and unexplained, that the result shifted with diabetes status, dose, pulse type, physical form and background diet, and that the effects are reported in standardised units nobody can convert into an HbA1c figure. It is from 2009 and trials as short as seven days counted. Read it as a direction. No regulator anywhere allows a pulse to claim it lowers cholesterol. The reviewers who produced the strongest trial evidence point this out themselves, and our own snapshots of the American and European registers agree: nothing for lentils in Europe, and only a content claim in the United States. An absent claim is not a verdict on the food. It usually means nobody with money to spend on a dossier stood to gain from filing one. One small pleasure of this food for anyone who reads labels across countries. Britain and America disagree about almost every fresh product and they agree about lentils, 7.158 mg of iron per 100 g against 7, with the American samples running 6.52 to 7.94. A dried lentil is a stored seed with no ripeness, no season and no water content to drift, which is exactly why the same comparison for pumpkin came apart by 82 percent. One thing this page does not tell you: we hold no evidence cards on who should be careful with lentils, so there is no safety section here, and that is a gap in what we have read rather than an all-clear.

Sources

  1. len-p1-05 · reference dataset comparison
    USDA Lentils, dry [FDC 2644283, foundation] iron 7.158 mg, Foundation samples 6.52-7.94 n=8; protein 23.569 g, samples 22.125-24.375; copper 0.838 mg, samples 0.761-0.881 n=8 || CoFID Lentils, red, split, dried, raw [13-657] Iron (mg) 7 · Protein (g) 25.6 · Copper (mg) 0.72
    USDA FoodData Central, Foundation Foods (FDC 2644283) and CoFID 2021, Public Health England / OGL v3.0 (code 13-657) · checked 2026-09-22
  2. len-p1-06 · reference dataset
    Lentils, NFS · Iron, Fe 3.1 MG per 100 g [fdc_id 2707423] · 1 cup 185 g 5.7 MG · Quantity not specified 92 g 2.9 MG
    USDA FNDDS 2021-2023, Lentils, NFS (fdc_id 2707423) · checked 2026-09-22
  3. len-p1-03 · randomised crossover trial with stable-isotope labelling
    We found that the mean iron absorption from the dal was 2.20% ± 3.40% and was significantly lower than the 23.6% ± 13.2% observed from the same iron load given as ferrous sulfate (P < 0.001).
    The Journal of Nutrition, 2015 · checked 2026-09-22
  4. len-p1-07 · reference dataset
    iron_mg · group 16 Legumes · 541 LEGUMES,CKD 2/2.5HRS,BOILED,DRAINED — 75% · 543 LEGUMES,CKD 2/2.5HRS,BLD,DRND,BKD — 75% · 545 LEGUMES,CKD 2/2.5HRS,BLD,DRND,FRIED — 75% · 542 LEGUMES,CKD 2/2.5HRS,BLD,WATER USED — 80% · 523 LEGUMES,CKD 45/75MIN,BLD,DRND,BKD — 80%
    USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007) · checked 2026-09-22
  5. len-p1-01 · systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Thirty-eight trials (52 trial comparisons, n=2095) with a median of 6 weeks and dose of 130 g/d (0.5-0.67 cup/d) showed that whole dietary pulses decreased low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (mean difference, -0.14 mmol/L [95% CI, -0.19 to -0.08])
    Journal of the American Heart Association, 2026 · checked 2026-09-22
  6. len-p1-02 · systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Pulses alone (11 trials) lowered fasting blood glucose (FBG) (-0.82, 95% CI -1.36 to -0.27) and insulin (-0.49, 95% CI -0.93 to -0.04)...Inter-study heterogeneity was high and unexplained for most outcomes
    Diabetologia, 2009 · checked 2026-09-22
  7. len-p1-04 · regulatory position stated in a systematic review
    Although dietary pulses are recognized by major clinical practice guidelines to reduce cholesterol and coronary heart disease risk, intake is low. There are no health claims for any pulse for cholesterol reduction, which could support uptake.
    Journal of the American Heart Association, 2026 · checked 2026-09-22

Review. Reviewed on 2026-09-24 for evidence level, dose and population context, and claims a reader could misread. Bioma Learn has no human medical reviewer at this time, and we say so rather than invent one. Methodology. This is information, not medical advice.

Related on Bioma

Pages that use this data.