Grapes: almost every study is about an extract
Start with a caution. The grape literature is a literature about seed extract, skin extract, pomace and resveratrol, and studies of the fruit itself barely exist. With that said, the compounds grapes share with cocoa and tea do lower blood pressure: 145 trials and 5205 people give about 2.8 over 2.0 mmHg, rising to almost 6 mmHg systolic in people who start hypertensive. Grape products lower LDL cholesterol by about 5 mg/dL across 48 trials. Both effects are real and small, and neither was produced by eating grapes.
Every statement here is tied to a source. The badge says what kind of evidence stands behind it: A is a meta-analysis or systematic review, E is the position of an expert body without its own analysis. How we verify →
The numbers, per 100 g
| USDA entry | kcal | Protein | Carbs | Fiber |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grapes, american type, raw | 67 | 0.63 g | 17.1 g | 0.9 g |
| Grapes, canned, thompson seedless, heavy syrup pack | 76 | 0.48 g | 19.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Grapes, canned, thompson seedless, water pack | 40 | 0.5 g | 10.3 g | 0.6 g |
| Grapes, red or green, raw | 69 | 0.72 g | 18.1 g | 0.9 g |
| Grapes, green, seedless, raw | 72 | 0.9 g | 18.6 g | — g |
| Grapes, muscadine, raw | 57 | 0.81 g | 13.9 g | 3.9 g |
| Grapes, red, seedless, raw | 77 | 0.91 g | 20.2 g | — g |
These are the USDA entries that are grapes, not foods made from it. Follow a name for the full profile and per-portion figures.
What your body absorbs
- Only about a quarter of the main plant acids in grapes and other foods ever reaches the blood or urine in measurable form. — 47 intervention studies with coffee, berries, herbs, cereals, tomato, orange and grape products and pure compounds (n = 47 studies) Evidence C sourceUp to 105 metabolites collected; caffeic and ferulic acid reached the highest blood concentrations (peak 423 nM) at 2.7 to 4.2 hours; urinary recovery was 4% for those acids and 1% for their phenylpropanoic derivatives against 11% for hydroxybenzene catabolites; the 16 to 18 main metabolites were collectively about 25% bioavailable
What it does to your health
- Grape products lowered LDL cholesterol by about five milligrams per decilitre across forty-eight trials. — 59 arms from 48 randomised controlled trials in adults (n = 48 trials) Evidence A sourceTotal cholesterol -6.196 mg/dL (95% CI -9.203 to -3.189), LDL -4.964 (-7.594 to -2.334) and triglycerides -7.641 (-12.120 to -3.162); HDL unchanged (+0.385, -0.364 to 1.133); HDL and LDL changed non-linearly with polyphenol dose
What people believe that the data does not support
- All three health claims filed in Europe for grape were refused, including the antioxidant one. — — Evidence E sourceThree register entries name grape and all three carry the status Non-authorised; the example is red grape skin extract claiming to help protect cells from free radical damage
Who this works differently for
- The plant compounds grapes share with cocoa and tea lowered blood pressure by about three points, and by twice that in people who started high. — 109 publications covering 145 randomised trials and 5205 participants, with interventions including cocoa, tea, grape extract and apples delivering about 586 mg of total flavan-3-ols (n = 5205) Evidence A sourceOffice blood pressure fell 2.8/2.0 mmHg and 24-hour ambulatory pressure 3.7/2.6 mmHg after chronic repeated intake; in people with elevated or hypertensive baseline pressure the office fall reached 5.9/2.7 mmHg; flow-mediated dilation rose 2.0% acutely; the size of the fall was inversely related to starting pressure
What is still unknown
- Grapes improved one measure of insulin resistance while fasting glucose moved slightly in favour of the control group. — 29 clinical trials with 1297 participants (n = 1297) Evidence A sourceHOMA-IR fell (-0.54, 95% CI -0.91 to -0.17, p = 0.004); fasting insulin unchanged (-0.90, -1.04 to 2.84) and HbA1c unchanged (0.00%, -0.10 to 0.11); fasting blood glucose changed in favour of the control group (+1.19 mg/dL, 0.05 to 2.34, p = 0.041)
- On the sugar damage markers grape polyphenols are sold to fix, the one that matters clinically did not budge. — 7 studies (n = 7 studies) Evidence C sourceGlycated haemoglobin was not affected; fructosamine and methylglyoxal fell and endogenous secretory RAGE gene expression rose without a change in its serum concentration; the authors suggest intervention durations may have been too short
The bottom line
The glucose findings are the ones that get left out. Across 29 trials, insulin resistance improved, fasting insulin did not move, HbA1c did not move, and fasting blood glucose changed in favour of the control group. When the two measures used in clinic stay flat and one moves the wrong way, the honest reading is no effect. Grapes contain sugar and that shows. On the antiglycation claims, seven studies found HbA1c unaffected. Polyphenol absorption is modest too, with the main dietary acids collectively about a quarter bioavailable. Europe refused all three claims filed for grape, including the antioxidant one, which no food has ever been granted.
Sources
- grp-dr-05 · systematic review of human intervention studies
Data accounted for 16 and 18 main urinary and blood HCA metabolites, which were moderately bioavailable in humans (collectively 25%).
Antioxid Redox Signal, 2024 · checked 2026-09-22 - grp-dr-02 · systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Meta-analysis indicated that the consumption of grape products reduced the concentration of total cholesterol (MD: -6.196 mg dl-1, 95% CI: -9.203, -3.189), low-density lipoprotein (MD: -4.964 mg dl-1, 95% CI: -7.594, -2.334) and triglyceride (MD: -7.641 mg dl-1, 95% CI: -12.120, -3.162).
Food Funct, 2019 · checked 2026-09-22 - grp-dr-06 · regulatory register entry
POL-HC-7081 Extract from the red grapes skin Helps to protect cells from the free-radical damage Helps to protect cells from the damage caused by free-radical Non-authorised
EU Register on nutrition and health claims, заява POL-HC-7081, знімок 2026-09-21 · checked 2026-09-22 - grp-dr-01 · systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Interventions decreased office (-2.8 [95% CI -3.9, -1.7]/-2.0 [-2.6, -1.3] mmHg) and 24 h-ambulatory BP (-3.7 [-5.8, -1.6]/-2.6 [-4.5, -0.8] mmHg) after chronic repetitive consumption.
Eur J Prev Cardiol, 2025 · checked 2026-09-22 - grp-dr-03 · systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
In addition, changes to fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels were in favor of the control group (WMD: 1.19 mg/dl, 95% CI: 0.05, 2.34, p = .041).
Phytother Res, 2021 · checked 2026-09-22 - grp-dr-04 · systematic review
Seven studies were included. Glycated hemoglobin was not affected. The interventions duration may not have been enough to detect changes.
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 2023 · checked 2026-09-22
Review. This page predates our review log, so no review date is shown; it is queued for a fresh review. Last updated 2026-09-22. Bioma Learn has no human medical reviewer at this time, and we say so rather than invent one. Methodology. This is information, not medical advice.