BiomaLearnFoodsNutrition factsNutrientsGuidesAnswersEvidence

Chicken wings: the kitchen decides the numbers

Chicken wings have almost no research of their own, so this page leans on studies of poultry and of fried food. The strongest finding is about poultry in general. In a meta-analysis of 8 randomized trials with 406 healthy adults, diets built on poultry or fish lowered LDL cholesterol by 8.9 mg/dL and diets built on lean beef by 8.2 mg/dL, and the difference was not significant (P = .905). Those diets used lean meat, some of the funding came from industry, and a wing with its skin is a fattier food. The kitchen changes the wing more than the bird does. In the US survey database one plain grilled wing weighs 1.2 oz (35 g) and gives about 93 calories, while one coated restaurant-fried wing weighs 1.9 oz (55 g) and gives about 178 calories, batter included. Sodium runs from 402 mg per 3.5 oz (100 g) for a wing grilled without sauce to 843 mg for the restaurant fried one. These are recipe records, and no restaurant was tested.

Every statement here is tied to a source. The badge says what kind of evidence stands behind it: A is a meta-analysis or systematic review, E is the position of an expert body without its own analysis. How we verify →

The numbers, per 3.5 oz (100 g)

USDA entrykcalProteinFatCarbsFiber
Chicken, wing, raw19117.5 g12.8 g0 g0 g
Chicken, wing, cooked, roasted20330.5 g8.13 g0 g0 g
Chicken, wing, cooked, stewed18127.2 g7.18 g0 g0 g
Chicken, broiler, rotisserie, BBQ, wing, meat and skin25723.4 g18 g0.6 g0 g
Chicken, broiler, rotisserie, BBQ, wing, meat only18628.3 g7.79 g0.54 g0 g
Chicken, broilers or fryers, rotisserie, original seasoning, wing, meat and skin, cooked26624.3 g18.8 g0.04 g0 g
Chicken, broilers or fryers, rotisserie, original seasoning, wing, meat only, cooked19727.7 g9.53 g0 g0 g
Chicken, broilers or fryers, wing, meat and skin, cooked, fried, batter32419.9 g21.8 g10.9 g0.3 g
Chicken, broilers or fryers, wing, meat and skin, cooked, fried, flour32126.1 g22.2 g2.39 g0.1 g
Chicken, broilers or fryers, wing, meat and skin, cooked, roasted25423.8 g16.9 g0 g0 g
Chicken, broilers or fryers, wing, meat and skin, cooked, stewed24922.8 g16.8 g0 g0 g
Chicken, broilers or fryers, wing, meat only, cooked, fried21130.1 g9.15 g0 g0 g
All 14 USDA entries for chicken wings (2 more)
USDA entrykcalProteinFatCarbsFiber
Chicken, broilers or fryers, wing, meat only, raw12622 g3.54 g0 g0 g
Chicken, wing, meat and skin, raw17318.4 g10.6 g-0.46 g— g

These are the USDA entries that are chicken wings, not foods made from it; they differ in cut, part, pack or preparation. Linked names have a page with the full profile and per-portion figures.

As people eat it, per 3.5 oz (100 g)

As eatenkcalProteinFatCarbsFiber
Chicken wing, NS as to cooking method25723.4 g18 g0.6 g0 g
Chicken wing, baked or broiled, from fast food / restaurant26423.1 g18.4 g0 g0 g
Chicken wing, baked or broiled, from pre-cooked25723.4 g18 g0.6 g0 g
Chicken wing, baked, broiled, or roasted, from raw25223.6 g16.7 g0 g0 g
Chicken wing, baked, coated26021.4 g16.9 g3.98 g0.2 g
Chicken wing, fried, coated, from fast food32317.8 g21.3 g15 g0.3 g
Chicken wing, fried, coated, from pre-cooked29418.6 g20.6 g7.15 g0.3 g
Chicken wing, fried, coated, from raw28919.4 g20.2 g5.96 g0.2 g
Chicken wing, fried, coated, from restaurant32317.8 g21.3 g15 g0.3 g
Chicken wing, grilled with sauce25019 g15.5 g7.28 g0.2 g
Chicken wing, grilled without sauce26523.1 g18.4 g0 g0 g
Chicken wing, rotisserie25723.4 g18 g0.6 g0 g
All 14 (2 more)
As eatenkcalProteinFatCarbsFiber
Chicken wing, sauteed26523.1 g18.4 g0 g0 g
Chicken wing, stewed24722.6 g16.7 g0 g0 g

USDA Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies (FNDDS, release 2024-10-31): chicken wings as it is prepared and served, from the recipes behind the national dietary survey, rather than a single laboratory sample.

How much is actually in it

What a real portion looks like

What cooking and storage change

What it does to your health

Safety, limits and interactions

What people believe that the data does not support

The bottom line

A British food table puts raw wing meat with skin at 193 calories and 12.4 g fat per 3.5 oz (100 g) without the bone. Marinated and barbecued, it reaches 274 calories, 3.6 g sugars and 390 mg sodium. The health data on cooking style is observational, and none of it isolates wings. Studies comparing the highest with the lowest fried-food intake link it with a 28 percent higher risk of major cardiovascular events (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.43), with high variation between the 17 studies and no link to overall mortality. In three US cohorts of 138,240 adults, grilling, broiling or roasting meat and chicken more than 15 times a month went with a 28 percent higher risk of type 2 diabetes than doing it under 4 times, with cooking method reported by questionnaire. Seven cohorts with 254,742 people link more white meat with a 13 percent lower stroke risk (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.97), for poultry in general. A larger pooling of 36 trials found no overall LDL difference between red meat diets and the diets that replaced it, and only swapping red meat for plant protein improved blood lipids. The caution that is documented for wings is about raw meat. In Belgium in 2007, wings had the highest Campylobacter counts among 656 raw chicken preparations. In South Korea, 79.5 percent of refrigerated raw wings carried Arcobacter, a bacterium whose clinical importance is still being studied. Across 48 Italian studies Campylobacter turned up in 62 percent of raw chicken skin samples. USDA FSIS advises cooking poultry, wings included, to a safe minimum internal temperature of 165 °F (74 °C), measured with a food thermometer, and advises against washing raw wings, because bacteria in raw poultry juices can spread to other foods, utensils and surfaces. In Malaysia, fried and grilled chicken were the main dietary source of heterocyclic amines, compounds formed in cooked meat, in a survey that measured exposure and no health outcome. We have no card on allergy, pregnancy, children or medicines for wings, so this page says nothing about those groups.

Related foods

More from the same food group (poultry products)

Sources

  1. cwng-daily-r8-09 · meta-analysis of prevalence
    On the basis of the meta-analysis, skin and faeces matrices exhibited a high pooled proportion of Campylobacter spp., 0.62 and 0.67, respectively, whereas meat had the lowest proportion of 0.20%, with high heterogeneity detected in the three matrices I2 = 97.5%-98.8%.
    Vet Med Sci, 2026 · checked 2026-09-29
  2. cwng-daily-r8-11 · dataset
    Sodium, Na per 100 g: grilled without sauce 402 MG | grilled with sauce 568 MG | fried, coated, from raw 419 MG | fried, coated, from restaurant 843 MG (1 wing 55 g = 463.6 MG) | plain, from other sources 729 MG
    USDA FNDDS 2021-2023, FDC 2706062, 2706063, 2706065, 2706068, 2706078 · checked 2026-09-29
  3. cwng-daily-r8-12 · dataset
    CoFID 18-295 Chicken, wing quarter, raw, meat and skin: Energy 193 kcal, Fat 12.4 g, Protein 20.3 g | 18-339 roasted, meat and skin: Energy 226 kcal, Fat 14.1 g, Sodium 100 mg | 19-541 Chicken wings, marinated, meat and skin, barbecued: Energy 274 kcal, Fat 16.6 g, Total sugars 3.6 g, Sodium 390 mg
    CoFID 2021 (Public Health England, OGL v3.0), codes 18-295, 18-339, 19-541 · checked 2026-09-29
  4. cwng-daily-r8-10 · dataset
    Chicken wing, grilled without sauce (fdc 2706062): 1 wing 35 g; 265 KCAL, 18.39 G fat, 23.13 G protein per 100 g | Chicken wing, fried, coated, from restaurant (fdc 2706068): 1 wing 55 g; 323 KCAL, 21.28 G fat, 17.77 G protein per 100 g
    USDA FNDDS 2021-2023, FDC 2706062 (code 24164000) and 2706068 · checked 2026-09-29
  5. cwng-daily-r8-06 · cross-sectional
    The results reveal that fried and grilled chicken were the major dietary source of heterocyclic amines in Malaysia.
    Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess, 2010 · checked 2026-09-29
  6. cwng-daily-r8-03 · meta-analysis of cohorts
    The pooled relative risks (95% confidence intervals) for total, red, processed and white meat consumption and total stroke incidence were 1.18 (1.09-1.28), 1.11 (1.03-1.20), 1.17 (1.08-1.25), and 0.87 (0.78-0.97), respectively.
    J Am Heart Assoc, 2017 · checked 2026-09-29
  7. cwng-daily-r8-04 · meta-analysis of observational studies
    In comparing the highest with lowest fried-food intake, summary RRs (95% CIs) were 1.28 (1.15 to 1.43; n=17, I2=82.0%) for major cardiovascular events
    Heart, 2021 · checked 2026-09-29
  8. cwng-daily-r8-05 · prospective cohort
    Independent of consumption amount, open-flame and/or high-temperature cooking for both red meat and chicken is associated with an increased T2D risk among adults who consume animal flesh regularly.
    Diabetes Care, 2018 · checked 2026-09-29
  9. cwng-daily-r8-07 · prevalence survey
    However, the Campylobacter counts and incidences in chicken wings were the highest and portioned-form products (legs, wings, and breasts) showed a higher probability of being Campylobacter positive compared to minced-form products (sausages, burgers, and minced meat).
    Appl Environ Microbiol, 2008 · checked 2026-09-29
  10. cwng-daily-r8-08 · prevalence survey
    Refrigerated chicken gizzard samples showed the highest detection rate (100%), followed by refrigerated chicken wing (79.5%), intestine (77.3%), neck skin (63.3%), pork (55.6%), frozen chicken legs (5.0%), and leafy green vegetables (4.4%) (p < 0.05).
    Food Microbiol, 2019 · checked 2026-09-29
  11. sf-fsis5-6 · agency advice
    FSIS recommends cooking whole poultry to a safe minimum internal temperature of 165 °F as measured using a food thermometer...Cook ground poultry to a safe minimum internal temperature of 165 °F as measured with a food thermometer.
    USDA FSIS, Doneness Versus Safety · checked 2026-10-08
  12. sf-poultrywash-chwings-1 · agency advice
    Washing raw poultry before cooking is not recommended because bacteria in raw meat and poultry juices can be spread to other foods, utensils, and surfaces.
    Chicken from Farm to Table, USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service · checked 2026-10-08
  13. cwng-daily-r8-01 · meta-analysis of RCTs
    Relative to the baseline diet, mean ± standard error changes (in mg/dL) after beef versus poultry/fish consumption, respectively, were -8.1 ± 2.8 vs. -6.2 ± 3.1 for total cholesterol (P = .630), -8.2 ± 4.2 vs. -8.9 ± 4.4 for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P = .905)
    J Clin Lipidol, 2012 · checked 2026-09-29
  14. cwng-daily-r8-02 · meta-analysis of RCTs
    There were no significant differences between red meat and all comparison diets combined for changes in blood concentrations of total, low-density lipoprotein, or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoproteins A1 and B, or blood pressure.
    Circulation, 2019 · checked 2026-09-29

Review. Reviewed on 2026-10-08 for evidence level, dose and population context, and claims a reader could misread. Bioma Learn has no human medical reviewer at this time, and we say so rather than invent one. Methodology. This is information, not medical advice.