BiomaLearnFoodsNutrition factsNutrientsGuidesAnswersEvidence

Apple and pear: one small trial and a lot of cohorts

The strongest trial on this pair is small and narrow. Over 12 weeks, 49 overweight women aged 30 to 50 with high cholesterol in Rio de Janeiro lost 2.7 lb (95% CI 0.97 to 4.1; metric: 1.22 kg, 0.44 to 1.85) eating three apples or three pears a day, against 1.9 lb (0.88 kg) on three oat cookies (P = 0.004). Everyone in it was already on an energy-reduced diet, and the apple and pear arms were pooled, so it cannot say which fruit did anything. Everything larger here is observational. Across three US cohorts, 207,241 people followed for 32 years, apples and pears ranked first among 19 fruits and vegetables rated high in metabolic quality. Eating a greater share of such produce went with a hazard ratio of 0.85 for major chronic disease (95% CI 0.81 to 0.90) in the stratum that ate least of it and 0.89 (0.84 to 0.94) in the stratum that ate most. The pear samples USDA analyzed held more fiber than the apple samples, but the cultivars are not matched. Total fiber was 3.1 g per 3.5 oz (100 g) in raw Bartlett pears and 2.6 g in green Anjou pears, against 2.1 g in raw Fuji apples. Soluble fiber across those six Bartlett samples ran from 0 to 1.0 g, a spread that says more about the assay than about pears. A medium apple weighs 7.1 oz (200 g) in the US survey table and a pear 180 g, so one piece of either is close to a fifth of a kilogram of fruit.

Every statement here is tied to a source. The badge says what kind of evidence stands behind it: A is a meta-analysis or systematic review, E is the position of an expert body without its own analysis. How we verify →

We have no USDA entry for apple | pear itself in this cohort. The evidence below stands on published studies rather than on a composition table, and we would rather say that than show you a number for something else.

How much is actually in it

What a real portion looks like

What your body absorbs

What cooking and storage change

What it does to your health

Safety, limits and interactions

What people believe that the data does not support

Who this works differently for

What is still unknown

The bottom line

In the EPIC calibration survey, 36,037 adults each gave one standardized 24-hour recall, and apples and pears were the largest single food source of flavan-3-ols in every country except the UK, where tea took that place. That describes what people eat rather than what it does to them. Cooking costs less than most people fear, and the table behind that number is old. For fruit as a group, baking keeps 80 percent of the vitamin C and 60 percent of the folate, stewing keeps 70 and 50 percent, and iron, magnesium, phosphorus and zinc survive in full. Those factors were set for the whole category of fruits and juices in a table dated 1975, not for apples or pears by name. Two entries in the EU register are worth knowing before you read a label. Pectins, the soluble fiber of both fruits, carry an authorized claim about maintaining normal blood cholesterol, but the claim belongs to the substance and needs a quantity threshold, so a whole apple does not inherit it. The wording that pectins induce satiety was refused. Refused means the evidence did not reach the bar at the time it was assessed, and not that nothing happens. The safety axis is thin, and nothing in it is about a whole fruit in a healthy adult. Birch pollen may cross-react with apple, and half of the children with rhinitis in a Swedish cohort of 2,447 eight-year-olds were sensitized to birch. In that same cohort some children reported food-related allergic symptoms and had to be excluded from the analysis, which is what an allergy to these fruits looks like inside a survey. The cross-reaction is described in the literature rather than measured by a food challenge, so if pollen season makes your mouth itch, raw apple is a question for an allergist. The only numeric limit either fruit has applies to juice. The FDA treats apple juice at 50 micrograms of patulin per kilogram or more as adulterated, which is a threshold for pulling a batch and not a daily dose for a person, and patulin gathers in bruised and rotting fruit. For the pair itself we found no interaction record and no kidney record in any layer. In those same Swedish children, apple and pear intake tracked with less rhinitis, asthma and sensitization, and most of the association moved toward nothing once children with food-related symptoms were left out. The authors read that as children avoiding the fruit that makes their mouth itch. Among 575 Norwegian women, daily eating of apples, pears, oranges or bananas rose from 24 percent before pregnancy to 41 percent in early pregnancy (P < 0.01), which is a fact about behavior and says nothing about the baby. When adults ate one apple, one pear and 6.8 fl oz (200 ml) of orange juice a day for 26 days, plasma antioxidant capacity rose in non-smokers and did not move in smokers. In the same study total and LDL cholesterol rose in the non-smokers and fell in the smokers. That study was not randomized, the abstract never says how many people took part, and the orange juice cannot be separated from the fruit. The basics are missing. No study in our corpus has measured how well the body takes up the polyphenols of either fruit, and eight of the nine reference layers hold nothing at all under the paired name, including the USDA composition table this page would normally draw.

Each food on its own

Questions answered from the trials

Sources

  1. aplpr-daily-r4-13 · reference dataset
    Pears, raw, bartlett: Fiber, total dietary 3.1 G range 2.5-3.7 median 3.1 n=6 · Fiber, soluble 0.3 G range 0.0-1.0 n=6 · Fiber, insoluble 2.8 G range 1.7-3.7 n=6 · Pear, Anjou, green, with skin, raw: Fiber, total dietary 2.636 G range 2.21-3.13 n=8 · Apples, fuji, with skin, raw: Fiber, total dietary 2.075 G range 1.89-2.32 n=8
    USDA FoodData Central, Foundation Foods, release 2026-04-30 · checked 2026-09-25
  2. aplpr-daily-r4-14 · reference dataset
    Pears, average, raw, flesh only, CoFID 14-365: Energy (kcal) 44 · AOAC fibre (g) 2.7 · NSP (g) 1.6 · Total sugars (g) 11.3 · Fructose (g) 6.9 · Glucose (g) 3.2 · Potassium (mg) 105 · Water (g) 85.2
    CoFID 2021, Public Health England, code 14-365 · checked 2026-09-25
  3. aplpr-daily-r4-08 · dietary survey
    Except for the UK, non-citrus fruits (apples/pears) were the highest contributors to the total flavan-3-ol intake. Tea was the main contributor of total flavan-3-ols in the UK.
    Br J Nutr, 2012 · checked 2026-09-25
  4. aplpr-daily-r4-16 · reference dataset
    FNDDS 63101000 Apple, raw: 1 small 165 g · 1 medium 200 g · 1 large 242 g · 1 extra large 295 g · 1 slice 25 g · 1 cup 125 g; FNDDS 63137010 Pear, raw: 1 fruit 180 g · 1 slice/chunk 25 g · 1 cup 125 g
    USDA FNDDS 2021-2023, codes 63101000 and 63137010 · checked 2026-09-25
  5. aplpr-daily-r4-02 · crossover feeding trial
    All subjects consumed four experimental diets in an assigned random order: a controlled basal diet, a legume/allium diet (containing garbanzo beans, garlic, and onions), and diets low or high in vegetables and fruits (containing apples, pears, potatoes, and carrots). ... Subjects excreted more of the lignan enterodiol on the high vegetable/fruit diet compared with the basal and legume/allium diets (P = .03)
    J Am Diet Assoc, 1995 · checked 2026-09-25
  6. aplpr-daily-r4-15 · reference dataset
    USDA-RETN-R6:151 FRUITS,FRESH(NOT CITRUS),BAKED, group Fruits and Fruit Juices: vitamin_c_mg 80% retained, folate_total_ug 60%, thiamin_mg 80%, potassium_mg 90%, iron_mg 100%; USDA-RETN-R6:155 FRUITS,FRESH(NOT CITRUS),STEWED: vitamin_c_mg 70% retained, folate_total_ug 50%, thiamin_mg 80%, potassium_mg 90%, iron_mg 100%
    USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6, 2007, Retn_Codes 151 and 155 · checked 2026-09-25
  7. aplpr-daily-r4-01 · randomized trial
    After 12 wk of follow-up, the fruit group lost 1.22 kg (95% confidence interval = 0.44-1.85), whereas the oat group had a non-significant weight loss of 0.88 kg (0.37-2.13). The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P = 0.004).
    Nutrition, 2003 · checked 2026-09-25
  8. aplpr-daily-r4-03 · cohort study
    Of 52 FV items, 19 were identified as high-metabolic quality (top 5: apples/pears, iceberg/head lettuce, raw spinach, alfalfa sprouts, and eggplant/summer squash). ... In each quantity level stratum (quartiles Q1-Q4), comparing the highest to the lowest quality proportion quartiles, the hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) were 0.85 (0.81-0.90), 0.86 (0.82-0.90), 0.84 (0.80-0.89), and 0.89 (0.84-0.94), all P-trend < 0.001.
    Am J Clin Nutr, 2024 · checked 2026-09-25
  9. aplpr-daily-r4-04 · cohort study
    Furthermore, intake of total whole fruit intake and specific fruits such as apples/pears and prunes were associated with reduced risk of diverticulitis with a multivariable hazard ratio for diverticulitis of 0.95 (0.92-0.98; P-trend < 0.001) for every serving increase of total whole fruit intake per day.
    Am J Gastroenterol, 2019 · checked 2026-09-25
  10. aplpr-daily-r4-05 · cohort study
    Pooled consumption of apple/pear, banana, mushrooms, and onion/garlic was associated with a lower risk of CD (fourth vs first quartile aHR 0.58; 95% CI: 0.33-1.02, P trend 0.03).
    Am J Gastroenterol, 2026 · checked 2026-09-25
  11. aplpr-daily-r4-06 · cohort study
    whereas higher intakes of fibre, apple/pear, and carbohydrates were associated with a lower risk of breast cancer (HRs per 1 SD increment = 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.98; 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.99; and 0.96, 95% CI 0.95-0.98, respectively).
    Breast Cancer Res, 2020 · checked 2026-09-25
  12. aplpr-daily-r4-07 · cohort study
    In a comparison of the highest vs the lowest quintiles of total flavonoid intake, the pooled multivariable-adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 3-unit increments in SCD was 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76, 0.89). ... Many flavonoid-rich foods such as strawberries, oranges, grapefruits, citrus juices, apples/pears, celery, peppers, and bananas, were significantly associated with lower odds of SCD.
    Neurology, 2021 · checked 2026-09-25
  13. aplpr-daily-r4-09 · cross-sectional study
    In analyses of individual foods, intake of apples/pears and carrots was inversely associated with rhinitis, asthma, and atopic sensitization. ... After exclusion of children who reported food-related allergic symptoms, most of the observed inverse associations moved toward the null and became nonsignificant.
    J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2011 · checked 2026-09-25
  14. aplpr-daily-r4-10 · cross-sectional study
    Fifty percent of the children with rhinitis were sensitized against birch pollen, which may cross-react with apples and carrots.
    J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2011 · checked 2026-09-25
  15. aplpr-daily-r4-19 · agency guidance
    FDA has established an action level for patulin in apple juice of 50 micrograms per kilogram (50 parts per billion)
    FDA, Guidance for Industry: Juice Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point Hazards and Controls Guidance, First Edition, 2004 · checked 2026-09-25
  16. aplpr-daily-r4-17 · claim register entry
    POL-HC-6437 Pectins Pectins contribute to the maintenance of normal blood cholesterol levels Authorised
    EU Register on nutrition and health claims, claim POL-HC-6437, snapshot 2026-09-21 · checked 2026-09-25
  17. aplpr-daily-r4-18 · claim register entry
    POL-HC-7734 Pectins Induce satiety sensation Non-authorised
    EU Register on nutrition and health claims, claim POL-HC-7734, snapshot 2026-09-21 · checked 2026-09-25
  18. aplpr-daily-r4-11 · cross-sectional study
    The percentage of women consuming FV daily or more frequently in the following categories increased from pre-pregnancy to early pregnancy: vegetables on sandwiches (13 vs. 17%, p <0.01), other vegetables (11 vs. 14%, p = 0.01), fruits (apples, pears, oranges or bananas) (24 vs. 41%, p < 0.01), other fruits and berries (8 vs. 15%, p < 0.01) and fruits and vegetables as snacks (14 vs. 28%, p < 0.01).
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2017 · checked 2026-09-25
  19. aplpr-daily-r4-12 · controlled trial
    Fruit consumption increased TAC in non-smokers, but not in smokers. In non-smokers, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol increased significantly; while in smokers, total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol decreased.
    Int J Food Sci Nutr, 2010 · checked 2026-09-25
  20. aplpr-daily-r4-20 · search record
    apple | pear: USDA composition 0 records · CoFID 0 under paired name · FNDDS 0 · retention R6 0 · NHANES 0 ranked nutrients · 21 CFR 101 0 for pectin · EU register 0 under fruit name · interactions 0 · corpus axis 2 query 0 of all types · corpus safety slice 0 · corpus kidney slice 0
    Bioma research layers, snapshot 2026-09-25 · checked 2026-09-25

Review. Reviewed on 2026-09-25 for evidence level, dose and population context, and claims a reader could misread. Bioma Learn has no human medical reviewer at this time, and we say so rather than invent one. Methodology. This is information, not medical advice.