BiomaLearnFoodsNutrientsGuidesAnswersEvidence

Calcium: the supplement question that experts still disagree about

Calcium is an odd case. The mineral itself is uncontroversial. Calcium supplements are one of the few places where two credible expert bodies read the same evidence and came away with different conclusions.

Every statement on this page is tied to a source. The badge shows what kind of evidence stands behind it. Evidence A is a meta-analysis or systematic review. E is the position of an expert body without its own analysis. Click "source" for the exact sentence we took it from. How we verify →

What kind of evidence stands behind this page
Level A — Meta-analysis or systematic review: 16 of 49 statementsLevel B — Randomised controlled trial(s): 4 of 49 statementsLevel C — Observational data: 16 of 49 statementsLevel E — Position of an expert body: 13 of 49 statements

A · 16B · 4C · 16E · 13

49 statements. A meta-analysis · B randomised trial · C observational · D laboratory · E position of an expert body. A page leaning on E is reporting consensus rather than weighing trials, and you can see that before you read a word of it.

We read the trials on this one. Do calcium supplements harm your heart? → Every estimate on one scale, with the search protocol shown.

What it does in the body

How much you need

How well your body absorbs it

What too little does

Who is most likely to fall short

What the evidence does and does not show

What too much does

Medicines it interacts with

How much you need, and where the ceiling is
0RDA (19–50) 1000 mgUpper limit 2500 mg

The gap between what you need and the safe ceiling is 2× here. Food alone rarely reaches the ceiling. Supplements are where people pass it. Values from cards ca-02 / ca-03 below.

What to do with this

Food first, and not because supplements are wicked. Food arrives in small doses across the day, which is how calcium is absorbed best, and it brings protein and other minerals with it.

Not all milligrams are equal. Dairy, fortified drinks and tinned fish with the bones in hand over most of what they promise. Spinach hands over very little, because oxalate holds on to it. Kale and other low-oxalate greens sit somewhere in between.

If you do take a supplement, split it into doses of 500 mg or less and keep calcium carbonate four hours away from levothyroxine. Be aware, too, that this is the one area of the site where two credible expert bodies read the same trials and disagreed about heart risk. That is a question to put to your own doctor rather than to a table of numbers.

If you are buying calcium for your bones, know what the trials found. Across 69 of them in 153,902 people, supplements made little to no difference to fractures in adults who were mostly healthy and living at home. For people who are frail or in care the picture is different and much thinner, and that is a question for a clinician who knows your own fracture risk.

If you are pregnant, ask rather than assume. The recommendation to take calcium against pre-eclampsia rested on a body of trials that has just been cut down by twenty, nine of them over doubts about whether the data were real, and what is left shows little to no effect at high certainty. Take that to your midwife or doctor. It is not a reason to stop something you were prescribed for a reason we cannot see from here.

If dairy is out, the carton is where this is won or lost. In an audit of 129 plant milks, 80.6 per cent carried added calcium, and as a group they matched cow's milk for it while falling short on protein, iodine and B12. The other fifth had none, and an unfortified almond or rice drink has almost none of its own. Read the nutrition panel once per brand and then stop thinking about it.

Do not let anyone sell you an alkaline diet for your bones. Eating more protein does put more calcium in your urine, and that is where the story starts and ends. In the controlled balance studies, whole-body calcium balance did not change with acid load and neither did a marker of bone breakdown.

Where to get it from food

Best sources of Calcium on this site, per portion
100% DVSesame seeds, whole, driedSesame seeds, whole, dried: 108% DV108%Parmesan cheese, dry grated…Parmesan cheese, dry grated, reduced fat: 85% DV85%Mozzarella cheese, nonfatMozzarella cheese, nonfat: 84% DV84%Monterey cheeseMonterey cheese: 76% DV76%Mozzarella cheese, low sodiumMozzarella cheese, low sodium: 74% DV74%Pasteurized process cheese, A…Pasteurized process cheese, American, low fat: 74% DV74%Muenster cheeseMuenster cheese: 73% DV73%Monterey cheese, low fatMonterey cheese, low fat: 72% DV72%

Share of the Daily Value (1300 mg) in one typical portion.

FoodPortion% DV
Sesame seeds, whole, dried1 cup (144 g)108%
Parmesan cheese, dry grated, reduced fat1 cup (100 g)85%
Mozzarella cheese, nonfat1 cup, shredded (113 g)84%
Monterey cheese1 cup, diced (132 g)76%
Mozzarella cheese, low sodium1 cup, diced (132 g)74%
Pasteurized process cheese, American, low fat1 cup, diced (140 g)74%
Muenster cheese1 cup, diced (132 g)73%
Monterey cheese, low fat1 cup, diced (132 g)72%

Top sources among the 1000 foods on this site, per typical portion. Full ranking →

The bottom line

Getting calcium from food is not in dispute. Supplements are, and the honest summary is that the effect on fractures is inconsistent and the effect on heart risk is contested. If you do take them, the size of each dose matters more than the total. Your body absorbs a 300 mg dose far more efficiently than a 1,000 mg one, so two small doses beat one large one. Two of these answers have moved since the page was written, and both moved the same way. The largest review of calcium supplements and fractures now covers 69 trials and 153,902 people, and it found little to no effect on breaking a bone. An earlier meta-analysis that also counted people in care homes had found a 30 per cent cut in hip fractures. The gap between those two is mostly a gap between who was in them, because the newer pool is largely people living at home who were not at high risk, and its authors say outright that for the frail end the evidence is thin. In pregnancy the change is sharper. The 2025 Cochrane update found calcium makes little to no difference to pre-eclampsia, with high certainty, after the reviewers removed 20 trials they had previously counted, nine of them over doubts about whether the data were real. Starting before conception did not work either. If you were told to take calcium in pregnancy, that instruction is older than the evidence under it, and it belongs in a conversation with whoever is looking after you. Three things have been added under this page since it was written, and one of them changes how you should read the rest. Milk is not the settled safe side of the argument. In two Swedish cohorts, 61,433 women followed for twenty years and 45,339 men for eleven, each extra glass a day went with slightly more fractures in women, a hazard ratio of 1.02 for any fracture and 1.09 for the hip, with men on no effect. A glass there is a measured 200 mL. Those are observations of people who chose what to drink, and no randomised trial of milk against fractures has ever been run, which is the honest limit on every claim about milk in either direction. Second, the alkaline diet argument is over: pooled balance studies show urinary calcium rising with the acid load of the diet while whole-body calcium balance and a marker of bone breakdown do not move. Third, if you drink plant milk, check the carton. Four cartons in five are fortified with calcium and the fifth is not, and the share has been climbing fast enough that a brand you checked two years ago tells you nothing about the one in your hand.

Daily Values are one number for everyone. Yours depend on your body, activity and goal. Bioma works out your personal targets and shows every meal against them, from a photo. About Bioma →

Sources

  1. ca-01 · Position of an expert body · expert body statement
    Calcium makes up much of the structure of bones and teeth and allows normal bodily movement by keeping tissue rigid, strong, and flexible.
    NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, Health Professional Fact Sheet: Calcium · checked 2026-09-15 · extracted
  2. ca-02 · Position of an expert body · expert body recommendation
    Ages 19–50: 1,000 mg; Men 51–70: 1,000 mg; Women 51+: 1,200 mg; Adults 71+: 1,200 mg (value from the source's table, not a sentence)
    NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, Health Professional Fact Sheet: Calcium · checked 2026-09-15 · independently re-checked
  3. ca-03 · Position of an expert body · expert body recommendation
    Ages 19–50: 2,500 mg; Ages 51–70: 2,000 mg; Ages >70: 2,000 mg (value from the source's table, not a sentence)
    NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, Health Professional Fact Sheet: Calcium · checked 2026-09-15 · extracted
  4. ca-r3-05 · Observational data · systematic review of balance and isotope studies
    The random-effects model meta-regression on 42 mass balance study arms showed an average net calcium retention of 40.4% among infants aged 0-6 mo (β = 0.404 [95% CI: 0.302, 0.506]). Isotope studies suggested calcium intake of 240 to 400 mg/d may promote optimal calcium absorption with minimal loss, and intake from human milk may lead to greater absorption and retention efficacy than formula or solid foods.
    Advances in Nutrition, 2022 · checked 2026-09-17 · independently re-checked
  5. ca-s1 · Randomised controlled trial(s) · randomised controlled trial
    The results showed that there were no significant differences in blood and urine metabolites, metabolic hormone [parathyroid hormone, 1, 25(OH)2D3] levels and biochemical indicators(serum Ca, serum P, glycolipid metabolism and hepatorenal function indicators)between the calcium supplementation group and control group at each time point throughout the trail (P>0.05).
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi, 2021 · checked 2026-09-17 · independently re-checked
  6. ca-c1-01 · Observational data · cross-sectional product audit
    As shown in Table 2, plant‐based milks were most consistently fortified with calcium (80.6% of products). All beverages that were fortified with only a single nutrient were fortified with calcium.
    Hunt et al., Nutrition & Dietetics, 2025 · checked 2026-09-18 · independently re-checked
  7. ca-c1-02 · Observational data · cross-sectional product audit
    Our data confirms that there has been a consistent increase in the proportion of plant‐based milks sold in Australia that are fortified with calcium, from 42.6% in 2020 (Zhang et al.) to 79% in 2021.
    Hunt et al., Nutrition & Dietetics, 2025 · checked 2026-09-18 · independently re-checked
  8. ca-c1-03 · Observational data · cross-sectional product audit
    All plant‐based milk varieties contained sodium and calcium in levels that were not significantly different to cow's milk.
    Hunt et al., Nutrition & Dietetics, 2025 · checked 2026-09-18 · independently re-checked
  9. ca-c1-04 · Observational data · systematic review and meta-analysis of composition studies
    The mean calcium concentration of breast milk was 261 mg/L (95% CI: 238, 284, range: 2, 686).
    Dror & Allen, International Breastfeeding Journal, 2023 · checked 2026-09-18 · independently re-checked
  10. ca-c1-07 · Position of an expert body · national dietary survey
    Milk and dairy products contributed over one-third (37%) to total calcium intake, of which about half (19%) was from plain milk.
    FSRG Dietary Data Briefs, USDA Agricultural Research Service, WWEIA/NHANES 2009-2010 · checked 2026-09-18 · independently re-checked
  11. ca-c1-09 · Observational data · cross-sectional national survey
    Overall, the contribution of drinking water was also relatively high in all population groups, with around 19% in adolescents and nonpregnant WRA and around 14% in children, contributing most in nonpregnant WRA with 57 mg/d.
    Nutrients, 2026 · checked 2026-09-18 · independently re-checked
  12. ca-04 · Position of an expert body · expert body statement
    Absorption of calcium from food is about 45% at intakes of 200 milligrams (mg)/day but only 15% when intakes are higher than 2,000 mg/day.
    NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, Health Professional Fact Sheet: Calcium · checked 2026-09-15 · independently re-checked
  13. ca-05 · Position of an expert body · expert body statement
    Absorption from supplements is highest with doses of 500 mg or less. For example, the body absorbs about 36% of a 300 mg calcium dose and 28% of a 1,000 mg dose.
    NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, Health Professional Fact Sheet: Calcium · checked 2026-09-15 · extracted
  14. ca-06 · Position of an expert body · expert body statement
    Absorption of calcium is only 5% for spinach, whereas it is much higher, at 27%, for milk.
    NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, Health Professional Fact Sheet: Calcium · checked 2026-09-15 · independently re-checked
  15. ca-s2 · Meta-analysis or systematic review · systematic review and meta-analysis
    Compared to controls, height increased 0.83 cm (95% CI 0.00; 1.65), plasma parathyroid hormone decreased -1.51 pmol/L, (-2.37; -0.65), urine:calcium creatinine ratio decreased -0.05, (-0.07; -0.03), femoral neck and hip bone mineral density increased 0.02 g/cm2 (0.01; 0.04) and 0.03 g/cm2 (0.00; 0.06), respectively.
    Nutrients, 2021 · checked 2026-09-17 · independently re-checked
  16. ca-s3 · Meta-analysis or systematic review · cluster-randomised controlled trial with meta-analysis of randomised trials
    Of 278 completed the trial, intention-to-treat analysis revealed significant increases in BMD (4.05% and 7.31%) and BMC (4.69% and 7.34%) in the left forearm at the 6th and 12th months in the milk group compared to controls (P < 0.001)...Additionally, milk supplementation was associated with beneficial changes in bone resorption markers, parathyroid hormone (- 12.70%), insulin-like growth factor 1 (6.69%), and the calcium-to-phosphorus ratio (2.22%) (all P < 0.05). The meta-analysis, encompassing 894 children, indicated that dairy supplementation significantly increased BMD (SMD, 0.629; 95%CI: 0.275, 0.983) and BMC (SMD, 0.616; 95%CI: 0.380, 0.851) (P < 0.05) in the arms, but not in the legs (P > 0.05).
    Archives of Osteoporosis, 2024 · checked 2026-09-17 · independently re-checked
  17. ca-c1-05 · Observational data · controlled crossover stable-isotope trial
    Mean fractional absorption of calcium from tortillas prepared from the low-phytate maize (0.50 +/- 0.03) was significantly (P = 0.003) greater than that from tortillas prepared from the control maize (0.35 +/- 0.07).
    Hambidge et al., American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2005 · checked 2026-09-18 · independently re-checked
  18. ca-c1-10 · Observational data · systematic review and meta-analysis
    A meta-analysis based on published p values indicated calcium absorption from mineral waters was significantly higher (p = 0.03) than that from dairy products.
    Böhmer et al., Osteoporosis International, 2000 · checked 2026-09-18 · independently re-checked
  19. ca-12 · Position of an expert body · expert body statement
    Calcium deficiency can reduce bone strength and lead to osteoporosis, which is characterized by fragile bones and an increased risk of falling.
    NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, Calcium - Health Professional Fact Sheet · checked 2026-09-16 · independently re-checked
  20. ca-13 · Position of an expert body · expert body statement
    Another effect of chronic calcium deficiency is osteomalacia, or defective bone mineralization and bone softening, which can occur in adults and children.
    NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, Calcium - Health Professional Fact Sheet · checked 2026-09-16 · independently re-checked
  21. ca-t6 · Observational data · systematic review of prospective cohort studies
    Most studies found no association between calcium intake and change in BMD in women (71%) or men (71%). Among women, five studies reported high rates (>30% of participants) of hormone treatment or osteoporosis therapy (HT/OT) use; 80% of these studies reported a positive association between calcium intake and change in BMD, compared with 10% of studies in which HT/OT use was low.
    Bristow et al., European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2022 · checked 2026-09-17 · independently re-checked
  22. ca-s4 · Observational data · systematic review of cohort studies and randomised trials
    For dietary calcium, most studies reported no association between calcium intake and fracture (14/22 for total, 17/21 for hip, 7/8 for vertebral, and 5/7 for forearm fracture). For milk (25/28) and dairy intake (11/13), most studies also reported no associations.
    Bolland et al., BMJ, 2015 · checked 2026-09-17 · independently re-checked
  23. ca-c1-06 · Randomised controlled trial(s) · randomised controlled trial
    The intervention group received additional education on specific preparation methods of different foodstuffs and consumed two hospital meals prepared according to these methods during hemodialysis.
    Journal of Nephrology, 2024 · checked 2026-09-18 · independently re-checked
  24. ca-07 · Randomised controlled trial(s) · clinical trials cited by expert body
    Not all clinical trials have found that these supplements improve bone health or reduce the risk of fractures in this population.
    NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, Health Professional Fact Sheet: Calcium · checked 2026-09-15 · extracted
  25. ca-08 · Meta-analysis or systematic review · meta-analysis of randomised trials
    A meta-analysis of 14 RCTs (including one study that administered supplements providing 20 mcg [800 IU] vitamin D per day) in 28,935 healthy postmenopausal women found that calcium supplements providing 500 to 2,000 mg/day calcium for 1 to 7 years increased CVD risk by 15% and coronary heart disease risk by 16%
    NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, Health Professional Fact Sheet: Calcium · checked 2026-09-15 · independently re-checked
  26. ca-09 · Position of an expert body · expert panel review
    An expert panel convened by the National Osteoporosis Foundation and American Society for Preventive Cardiology determined, on the basis of moderate-quality evidence, that calcium intakes with or without vitamin D from foods or supplements neither increase nor decrease the risk of CVD or CVD mortality.
    NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, Health Professional Fact Sheet: Calcium · checked 2026-09-15 · independently re-checked
  27. ca-h01 · Randomised controlled trial(s) · randomised controlled trial, long-term follow-up
    For women randomly assigned to CaD versus placebo, a 7% reduction in cancer mortality was observed after a median cumulative follow-up of 22.3 years (1817 vs. 1943 deaths; hazard ratio [HR], 0.93 [95% CI, 0.87 to 0.99]), along with a 6% increase in CVD mortality (2621 vs. 2420 deaths; HR, 1.06 [CI, 1.01 to 1.12]). There was no overall effect on other measures, including all-cause mortality (7834 vs. 7748 deaths; HR, 1.00 [CI, 0.97 to 1.03]).
    Thomson et al., Annals of Internal Medicine, 2024 · checked 2026-09-16 · independently re-checked
  28. ca-h03 · Meta-analysis or systematic review · meta-analysis of randomised trials
    Calcium supplements significantly increased the risk of CVD (RR 1.15, 95% CI 1.06-1.25], I2 = 0.0%, n = 14) and CHD (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05-1.28], I2 = 0.0%, n = 9) in double-blind, placebo-controlled RCTs, specifically in healthy postmenopausal women.
    Myung et al., Nutrients, 2021 · checked 2026-09-16 · independently re-checked
  29. ca-h04 · Meta-analysis or systematic review · systematic review and meta-analysis
    Calcium supplementation was not associated with myocardial infarction, total stroke, heart failure admission, and cardiovascular/all-cause mortality. Further studies are required to examine and understand these associations.
    Yang et al., Heart, Lung and Circulation, 2023 · checked 2026-09-16 · independently re-checked
  30. ca-h05 · Observational data · meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies
    Dietary calcium intake was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (Pooled ES for highest v lowest category: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.92-0.99, I2=62.1%, P < 0.001). Supplemental calcium intake was not significantly associated with risk of all-cause, CVD and cancer mortality.
    Asemi et al., Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 2022 · checked 2026-09-16 · independently re-checked
  31. ca-t1 · Meta-analysis or systematic review · systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials
    For the primary outcome of any fracture, little to no effect was found from use of calcium supplements (11 trials, 9067 participants; risk ratio 0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.81 to 1.01; moderate certainty), vitamin D supplements (36 trials, 92 045 participants; 1.00, 0.95 to 1.06; high certainty), or combined supplementation (15 trials, 51 126 participants; 0.91, 0.84 to 0.99; high certainty).
    Bolland et al., BMJ, 2026 · checked 2026-09-17 · independently re-checked
  32. ca-t2 · Meta-analysis or systematic review · systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials
    Participants in most of the trials were community dwelling (87%) and not at high risk of fractures or falls (73%)...Evidence for high risk patients or those requiring residential care was limited for many outcomes for calcium monotherapy and for combined supplementation.
    Bolland et al., BMJ, 2026 · checked 2026-09-17 · independently re-checked
  33. ca-t3 · Meta-analysis or systematic review · systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials
    There was no significant association of calcium or vitamin D with risk of hip fracture compared with placebo or no treatment (calcium: RR, 1.53 [95% CI, 0.97 to 2.42]; ARD, 0.01 [95% CI, 0.00 to 0.01]; vitamin D: RR, 1.21 [95% CI, 0.99 to 1.47]; ARD, 0.00 [95% CI, -0.00 to 0.01]. There was no significant association of combined calcium and vitamin D with hip fracture compared with placebo or no treatment (RR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.85 to 1.39]; ARD, 0.00 [95% CI, -0.00 to 0.00]).
    Zhao et al., JAMA, 2017 · checked 2026-09-17 · independently re-checked
  34. ca-t4 · Meta-analysis or systematic review · meta-analysis of randomised trials
    Meta-analysis of all studies showed that calcium plus vitamin D supplementation produced a statistically significant 15 % reduced risk of total fractures (SRRE, 0.85; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.98) and a 30 % reduced risk of hip fractures (SRRE, 0.70; 95 % CI, 0.56-0.87).
    Weaver et al., Osteoporosis International, 2016 · checked 2026-09-17 · independently re-checked
  35. ca-t5 · Meta-analysis or systematic review · systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials
    Combined supplementation modestly improved BMD at the pelvis (SMD = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.05–0.35, p = 0.01) without significant changes in BMD at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, or total hip. The overall fracture risk was not significantly reduced (RR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.89–1.07, p = 0.68).
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2025 · checked 2026-09-17 · independently re-checked
  36. ca-r3-01 · Meta-analysis or systematic review · Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis
    Calcium may result in little to no difference in pre-eclampsia (risk ratio (RR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67 to 1.04; 6 RCTs, 15,364 women; risk difference (RD) 9/1000 fewer, 95% CI 17 fewer to 2 more; low-certainty evidence). Sensitivity analysis excluding small studies (fewer than 500 participants) indicates little to no difference in pre-eclampsia (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.05; 4 RCTs, 14,730 women; high-certainty evidence).
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2025 · checked 2026-09-17 · independently re-checked
  37. ca-r3-02 · Meta-analysis or systematic review · Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis
    We included 10 RCTs with 37,504 participants. All trials provided standard care. Eight compared calcium supplementation to placebo, and two compared low- to high-dose calcium supplementation. We excluded 20 previously included trials; 11 because eligibility criteria changed and nine because they are awaiting classification due to trustworthiness issues.
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2025 · checked 2026-09-17 · independently re-checked
  38. ca-r3-03 · Meta-analysis or systematic review · Cochrane systematic review of randomised trials
    Compared to placebo, calcium may result in little to no difference in pre-eclampsia or pregnancy loss at any gestational age (risk ratio (RR) 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67 to 1.07; 1 RCT, 1355 women; risk difference (RD) 28/1000 fewer, 95% CI 61 fewer to 13 more; low-certainty evidence)...Compared to placebo, calcium may result in little to no difference in pre-eclampsia (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.14; 1 RCT, 1355 women; RD 19/1000 fewer, 95% CI 46 fewer to 17 more; low-certainty evidence).
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2025 · checked 2026-09-17 · independently re-checked
  39. ca-r3-04 · Meta-analysis or systematic review · Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis
    The effect on systolic and diastolic blood pressure was: mean difference (MD) -1.37 mmHg, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.08, -0.66; 3140 participants; 18 studies; I2 = 0%, high-certainty evidence; and MD -1.45, 95% CI -2.23, -0.67; 3039 participants; 17 studies; I2 = 45%, high-certainty evidence, respectively.
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2022 · checked 2026-09-17 · independently re-checked
  40. ca-c1-11 · Meta-analysis or systematic review · meta-analysis of randomised balance studies
    In conclusion, this meta-analysis does not support the concept that the calciuria associated with higher NAE reflects a net loss of whole body calcium. There is no evidence from superior quality balance studies that increasing the diet acid load promotes skeletal bone mineral loss or osteoporosis.
    Fenton et al., Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2009 · checked 2026-09-18 · independently re-checked
  41. ca-c1-12 · Meta-analysis or systematic review · meta-analysis of randomised balance studies
    Changes of urine calcium do not accurately represent calcium balance. Promotion of the "alkaline diet" to prevent calcium loss is not justified.
    Fenton et al., Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2009 · checked 2026-09-18 · independently re-checked
  42. ca-c1-13 · Observational data · prospective cohort studies
    For every glass of milk in women no reduction was observed in fracture risk with higher milk consumption for any fracture (1.02, 1.00 to 1.04) or for hip fracture (1.09, 1.05 to 1.13).
    Michaëlsson et al., BMJ, 2014 · checked 2026-09-18 · independently re-checked
  43. ca-c1-14 · Observational data · prospective cohort studies
    Instructions were given that one serving of milk corresponded to one glass of 200 mL.
    Michaëlsson et al., BMJ, 2014 · checked 2026-09-18 · independently re-checked
  44. ca-c1-15 · Observational data · stated evidence gap in a prospective cohort study
    The fact that no randomised trial has examined the effect of milk intake on incidence of mortality and fractures, long term experimental evidence is needed to confirm a causal association between higher milk intake and higher mortality.
    Michaëlsson et al., BMJ, 2014 · checked 2026-09-18 · independently re-checked
  45. ca-c1-16 · Observational data · systematic review and meta-analysis of composition studies
    Moreover, the statistical heterogeneity was high for all three nutrients (I2 of 100% and significant τ2).
    Dror & Allen, International Breastfeeding Journal, 2023 · checked 2026-09-18 · independently re-checked
  46. ca-10 · Observational data · observational evidence cited by expert body
    The ULs for calcium...are based on observational evidence from the WHI showing a link between higher intakes of supplemental calcium (1,000 mg/day for 7 years) and a greater risk of kidney stones.
    NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, Health Professional Fact Sheet: Calcium · checked 2026-09-15 · extracted
  47. ca-c1-08 · Position of an expert body · national dietary survey
    The average intake of calcium from multi- or single ingredient supplements was 521 mg (3).
    FSRG Dietary Data Briefs, USDA Agricultural Research Service, WWEIA/NHANES 2009-2010 · checked 2026-09-18 · independently re-checked
  48. ca-11 · Position of an expert body · expert body statement
    Calcium carbonate supplements can interfere with the absorption of levothyroxine...The FDA-approved label for this medication instructs patients who are taking calcium carbonate supplements to avoid taking levothyroxine within 4 hours of taking the supplement.
    NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, Health Professional Fact Sheet: Calcium · checked 2026-09-15 · extracted
  49. ca-14 · Position of an expert body · expert body statement
    Simultaneous use of calcium supplements and quinolone antibiotics—such as ciprofloxacin (Cipro), gemifloxacin (Factive), and moxifloxacin (Avelox)—can reduce the absorption of quinolones.
    NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, Calcium - Health Professional Fact Sheet · checked 2026-09-16 · independently re-checked

Review. Last updated 2026-09-21. Reviewed for evidence level, dose and population context, completeness of cautions, and claims a reader could misread. Bioma Learn has no human medical reviewer at this time, and we say so rather than invent one. Methodology. This is information, not medical advice.

Related on Bioma

Pages that use this data.