BiomaLearnFoodsNutrientsGuidesAnswersEvidence

Walnuts: two years of daily walnuts did nothing for memory

The Walnuts and Healthy Aging trial gave 708 healthy older people 30 to 60 grams of walnuts a day for two years and measured their thinking with a full neuropsychological battery. The global cognition score did not differ from the control group. That is the strongest test anyone has run of the claim walnuts are best known for, and it is negative. A difference did appear in one of the two study sites in an analysis done after the fact, which is the weakest kind of result and is how the trial usually gets reported. Compliance was good and the nuts were well tolerated, so this is not a failed experiment. It is an answer.

Every statement here is tied to a source. The badge says what kind of evidence stands behind it: A is a meta-analysis or systematic review, E is the position of an expert body without its own analysis. How we verify →

The numbers, per 100 g

USDA entrykcalProteinCarbsFiber
Walnuts, English, halves, raw67914.6 g10.9 g5.21 g
Walnuts, black, dried61924.1 g9.58 g6.8 g
Walnuts, dry roasted64314.3 g17.9 g7.1 g
Nuts, walnuts, glazed5008.28 g47.6 g3.6 g

These are the USDA entries that are walnuts, not foods made from it. Follow a name for the full profile and per-portion figures.

What a real portion looks like

What your body absorbs

What it does to your health

Safety, limits and interactions

What people believe that the data does not support

What is still unknown

The bottom line

What walnuts do measurably is small and real: across 25 trials in 2155 people they lowered apolipoprotein B, a count of the particles that drive artery disease, and left blood pressure alone. The more interesting finding is about calories. Nuts consistently deliver less energy than their labels claim, because some of the fat stays locked inside cell walls, and how much escapes depends on the form: flour gives up more than chopped, chopped more than whole, nut butter more than roasted, roasted more than raw. Whole raw nuts are the stingiest version of themselves. Walnuts also hold one of the few food claims Europe has ever authorised, about the elasticity of blood vessels, and the snapshot we hold does not say how many you need to eat for it.

Sources

  1. wal-dr-02 · systematic review and meta-analysis
    The meta-analyses identified a nonsignificant increase in REE associated with nut consumption (weighted mean difference: 28.6 kcal/d; 95% CI: -10.7, 67.8 kcal/d).
    Adv Nutr, 2023 · checked 2026-09-22
  2. wal-dr-01 · systematic review with narrative synthesis
    The ME of nuts was consistently lower than that predicted by Atwater factors for investigated nut types (almonds, cashews, hazelnuts, pistachios, walnuts, and peanuts).
    Adv Nutr, 2023 · checked 2026-09-22
  3. wal-dr-03 · systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Walnut significantly decreased ApoB (WMD = -0.06; 95% CI: -0.10, -0.01, p = 0.002), but did not affect ApoA1 (WMD = -0.50; 95% CI: -1.34, 0.33, p = 0.249), systolic blood pressure (SBP) (WMD = -1.20; 95% CI: -4.02, 1.61, p = 0.401) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (WMD = -0.44; 95% CI: -2.55, 1.67, p = 0.682).
    Endocrinol Diabetes Metab, 2026 · checked 2026-09-22
  4. wal-dr-05 · systematic review
    Overall the findings indicate positive effects of Brazil nuts and baru almond oil on oxidative stress and inflammation markers, while walnuts reduced LDL cholesterol and blood pressure while posing no risk regarding electrolytes balance.
    Front Nutr, 2025 · checked 2026-09-22
  5. wal-dr-06 · regulatory register entry
    POL-HC-6525 Walnuts Walnuts contribute to the improvement of the elasticity of blood vessels Authorised
    EU Register on nutrition and health claims, заява POL-HC-6525, знімок 2026-09-21 · checked 2026-09-22
  6. wal-dr-04 · randomised controlled trial
    Walnut supplementation for 2 y had no effect on cognition in healthy elders.
    Am J Clin Nutr, 2020 · checked 2026-09-22

Review. This page predates our review log, so no review date is shown; it is queued for a fresh review. Last updated 2026-09-22. Bioma Learn has no human medical reviewer at this time, and we say so rather than invent one. Methodology. This is information, not medical advice.