BiomaLearnFoodsNutrientsGuidesAnswersEvidence

Vegetarian eating: what the trials moved and what they did not

Two parts of this question have been through randomised trials, and they point in different directions. In 681 adults with type 2 diabetes across nine trials, vegetarian and vegan diets lowered HbA1c by 0.36 percentage points against omnivorous eating, with LDL down 0.16 mmol/L and BMI down 0.94 kg/m2, and no change in systolic blood pressure or fasting glucose. Everyone in those trials already had diagnosed type 2 diabetes, and that drop has not been shown in people without it. In ten trials covering 545 adults, the same style of eating showed no significant change in C-reactive protein (WMD -0.04, 95% CI -0.23 to 0.15), the inflammation marker it is most often credited with lowering. In most of those trials CRP was a secondary endpoint, and nobody can be blinded to what they are eating, so read that as an absence of a measured difference. An umbrella review of 30 reviews points the other way, linking vegetarian eating to lower CRP, and rates its own certainty low to very low. The cancer figure people quote, 13 percent lower total incidence, comes from seven prospective cohorts rather than trials, so it describes people who chose this way of eating along with everything else they chose. Iron stores read lower as well. In cross-sectional comparisons, vegetarian adults carried serum ferritin 29.71 ug/L below omnivores, and in men the gap was 61.88 ug/L. Ferritin tracks how much iron is stored, and a low reading is not the same thing as anaemia.

Every statement here is tied to a source. The badge says what kind of evidence stands behind it: A is a meta-analysis or systematic review, E is the position of an expert body without its own analysis. How we verify →

We have no USDA entry for vegetarian itself in this cohort. The evidence below stands on published studies rather than on a composition table, and we would rather say that than show you a number for something else.

What your body absorbs

What cooking and storage change

What it does to your health

Safety, limits and interactions

Who this works differently for

What is still unknown

The bottom line

If you eat this way, iron and B12 are the two to watch, and they behave differently. The ferritin gap above is measured in blood and it is widest in men. B12 is the one that can be managed: in 1,994 Seventh-day Adventists, plant-based eaters and omnivores showed no difference in serum B12 at all, and the authors put that down to fortified foods and supplements. That zero belongs to that group. Adventists reach for fortified foods and supplements more often than vegetarians in general, so the result does not carry across on its own, and intake varied so much between those studies that heterogeneity came out at I2 90%. Zinc runs about 0.88 mg a day lower with serum zinc 0.93 umol/L lower, and that gap was larger in women, in vegans and in studies from developing countries. A review of work published between 2010 and 2023 points at phytates and oxalates in plant foods as part of why B12, iron, DHA and EPA land short, which puts food preparation alongside the shopping list. Children are a separate case. Across 59 studies and 48,626 children, vegetarian and vegan eating went with higher odds of iron deficiency and anaemia, and with B12 deficiency in vegan children, while group averages stayed inside paediatric reference ranges and height, weight and BMI z-scores sat lower. Take that to your paediatrician before you take it to a forum. Long-chain omega-3 is the other predictable shortfall. Across 45 studies, intake of the plant precursor ALA went up while EPA and DHA in the blood stayed lower anyway, most of all on vegan diets. Some of those studies tested microalgae oil and recorded higher serum DHA in the people taking it. What to do with that finding is a conversation with your doctor. One finding here is uncomfortable and we are leaving it in. Pooling 26 cross-sectional studies of 23,783 adults, vegetarians and vegans scored higher on symptoms of orthorexia, a standardised difference of 0.46 and odds of 1.99. Cross-sectional means nobody can say which came first, and the studies disagreed with each other a lot. Three things on this page have no evidence card behind them, and saying so is more useful than filling the space. There is no USDA table here because the database measures foods and this is a way of eating, so we cannot show you a composition row or a typical portion. We found nothing testing the claims that circulate about vegetarian eating, which is partly an artefact of where claims are registered: the American and European registers are indexed by substance rather than by diet. And the strength of the evidence needs a flag of its own. An umbrella review of 30 reviews covering 225 primary studies found vegetarian diets inversely associated with CRP and rated that certainty low to very low, which sits against the randomised pooling quoted higher up. Kidney function is the one place we have a clean null. Over about seven years in 10,219 adults of Dutch, Surinamese, Turkish and Moroccan background living in Amsterdam, sticking to a vegetarian diet showed no link with change in kidney function, while each extra gram of fibre a day went with a 0.10 smaller decline in eGFR in women.

Sources

  1. vgtn-r1-05 · systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies
    The meta-analysis which combined data of 24 cross-sectional studies showed that adult vegetarians have significantly lower serum ferritin levels than their non-vegetarian controls (-29.71 µg/L, 95% CI [-39.69, -19.73], p < 0.01)
    Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 2018 · checked 2026-09-23
  2. vgtn-r1-06 · systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in humans
    Dietary zinc intakes and serum zinc concentrations were significantly lower (-0.88 ± 0.15 mg day(-1), P < 0.001 and -0.93 ± 0.27 µmol L(-1), P = 0.001 respectively; mean ± standard error) in populations that followed habitual vegetarian diets compared with non-vegetarians.
    J Sci Food Agric, 2013 · checked 2026-09-23
  3. vgtn-r1-12 · critical systematic review of the literature
    However, deficiencies in critical nutrients such as vitamin B12, DHA, EPA, and iron have been consistently associated with an increased risk of cognitive decline, mood disturbances, and neurodegenerative disorders. Additionally, the presence of antinutritional factors like phytates and oxalates may further impair nutrient absorption, necessitating careful dietary planning and supplementation.
    Nutrients, 2025 · checked 2026-09-23
  4. vgtn-r1-01 · systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies
    The summary RRs (95% CIs) for vegetarians vs. non-vegetarians was 0.87 (0.84-0.91, I2 = 0%, n = 4 studies) for total cancer incidence
    Eur J Epidemiol, 2026 · checked 2026-09-23
  5. vgtn-r1-02 · systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Nine RCTs (681 participants) were included in this meta-analysis. The results indicated that vegetarian or vegan diets could reduce glycosylated hemoglobin, type A1C (HbA1c) (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -0.36%; 95% CI: -0.54, -0.19; P < .001)
    Nutr Rev, 2025 · checked 2026-09-23
  6. vgtn-r1-03 · systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in adults
    The meta-analysis of 11 eligible studies involving 545 participants, illustrated that vegetarian diets did not significantly change CRP levels in comparison to the control group (Weighted Mean Difference (WMD): -0.04, 95% CI: -0.23, 0.15; p = 0.683)
    BMC Nutr, 2026 · checked 2026-09-23
  7. vgtn-r1-09 · systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
    Meta-analysis showed no significant differences in serum vitamin B12 levels (MD: -9.85 pmol/L; 95% CI: -45.64 to 25.94 pmol/L; P = 0.54, I2 = 50%) or daily intake (MD: 3.31 mcg/d; 95% CI: -4.70 to 11.32 mcg/d; P = 0.42, I2 = 90%) between plant-based Adventists and omnivore controls, although there was high heterogeneity between the studies.
    Am J Health Promot, 2025 · checked 2026-09-23
  8. vgtn-r1-10 · systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies
    Adults who followed VVDs had moderately higher ON symptoms compared to omnivores (standardized mean differences using Cohen's d index = 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.33, 0.60; inconsistency index [I 2] = 81.0%)
    Int J Eat Disord, 2026 · checked 2026-09-23
  9. vgtn-r1-07 · systematic review and meta-analysis of nutritional and health outcomes
    Searches in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science up to March 2025 identified 59 studies including 48,626 participants (7,280 lacto-ovo-vegetarians, 1289 vegans, and 40,059 omnivores)...increased odds of iron deficiency and anemia were observed in lacto-ovo-vegetarians, and vitamin B12 deficiency in vegans
    Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 2026 · checked 2026-09-23
  10. vgtn-r1-08 · systematic review of PUFA status in humans
    A total of 45 studies were involved; the review found that vegetarian diets increased linoleic acid (C18:2 n-6, LA) and alpha-linolenic acid (C18:3 n-3, ALA) intake but resulted in significantly reduced concentrations of eicosapentaenoic acid (C20:5 n-3, EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (C22:6 n-3, DHA), particularly in vegan diets.
    Lipids, 2026 · checked 2026-09-23
  11. vgtn-r1-04 · umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
    Additionally, a significant inverse association was identified between a vegetarian diet and CRP levels, with low to very low CoE.
    Nutr Rev, 2026 · checked 2026-09-23
  12. vgtn-r1-11 · multiethnic prospective cohort study
    We did not find an association between vegetarian diet adherence and eGFR or ACR change for both sexes. However, a 1 g/day higher fiber intake at baseline was associated with a lower decrease in eGFR of 0.10 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02, 0.17) in women
    J Ren Nutr, 2026 · checked 2026-09-23

Review. Reviewed on 2026-09-23 for evidence level, dose and population context, and claims a reader could misread. Bioma Learn has no human medical reviewer at this time, and we say so rather than invent one. Methodology. This is information, not medical advice.