BiomaLearnFoodsNutrition factsNutrientsGuidesAnswersEvidence

Tuna salad with egg: what the egg adds

We found no study of tuna salad with egg as a dish, so this page is built from research on its parts. The strongest of it is about eggs alone. A meta-analysis of 7 randomized trials in 3,673 children aged 6 to 59 months in sub-Saharan Africa found that egg-based feeding raised weight-for-age by 0.33 z (95% CI 0.11 to 0.55) in settings with child malnutrition, and did not change height-for-age. The egg also changes what you absorb from the vegetables beside it. In 16 healthy young men eating single test meals of raw vegetable salad with no tuna, adding 5.3 oz (150 g) of cooked whole egg raised absorption of carotenoids that eggs do not contain 3 to 8 fold. A similar trial measured vitamin E as alpha-tocopherol, which reached 981 against 117 nmol/L over 10 hours with 5.3 oz (150 g) of egg, while 2.6 oz (75 g) of egg did no better than the salad alone. In the US survey database, a recipe-based composite rather than a lab measurement, tuna salad with egg has 190 calories, 10.28 g protein and 393 mg sodium per 3.5 oz (100 g), and a cup weighs 8.4 oz (238 g).

Every statement here is tied to a source. The badge says what kind of evidence stands behind it: A is a meta-analysis or systematic review, E is the position of an expert body without its own analysis. How we verify →

As people eat it, per 3.5 oz (100 g)

As eatenkcalProteinFatCarbsFiber
Tuna salad with egg19010.3 g15.4 g2.74 g0.4 g

USDA Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies (FNDDS, release 2024-10-31): tuna salad with egg as it is prepared and served, from the recipes behind the national dietary survey, rather than a single laboratory sample.

How much is actually in it

What a real portion looks like

What your body absorbs

What it does to your health

Safety, limits and interactions

What people believe that the data does not support

Who this works differently for

The bottom line

The mayonnaise may help in a similar way. In a randomized crossover study on 9 men, carrots eaten with mayonnaise raised blood beta-carotene more than carrots alone or carrot juice, although the abstract gives no size for the difference. Mercury is the caution with the tuna, and the type of tuna matters. FDA and EPA advice for people who are or might become pregnant or breastfeeding, and for children aged 1 to 11, says albacore, or white tuna, typically contains three times more mercury than canned light tuna. We have no card on how many servings a week that advice allows, so this page cannot tell a pregnant reader or a parent how often this salad fits. Check the FDA/EPA advice itself before making it a regular meal. In 700 three-year-olds in New Hampshire, eating fish including tuna went with 120 percent higher toenail mercury than eating no fish (95% CI 82 to 164 percent), a marker of exposure with no health outcome measured. Across 1,295 canned tuna samples from the Iranian market, mercury averaged 0.11 micrograms per gram of wet weight. The egg brings the allergy question. In a single center, 115 of 123 egg-allergic children with a median age of 12 months (93.4 percent) tolerated boiled egg yolk at a supervised food challenge, a result about yolk alone, while this salad contains whole egg. Those challenges were run under medical supervision, and the result is not a reason to test an egg-allergic child at home. Eggs still carry a reputation for harming the heart. An umbrella review of 14 meta-analyses found no association between high and low egg intake and any cardiovascular outcome or death from any cause. That answer stays soft because most of the pooled studies were observational and the authors rated the overall quality critically low. Observational data from 99,453 people, mainly in Asia and the US, link eating close to 1.8 oz (50 g) of egg a day with a 9 percent lower risk of cognitive decline (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.99). That is an association and does not show the egg caused it. We have no card on Listeria in ready-made tuna salad or on how long it keeps in the fridge, so this page cannot say that a shop-bought deli salad is safe in pregnancy.

Related foods

More from the same food group (seafood mixed dishes)

Sources

  1. tswe-r3-11 · USDA FNDDS, dataset
    Tuna salad with egg (FNDDS 27450100, fdc_id 2706840): Energy 190 KCAL; Protein 10.28 G; Sodium, Na 393 MG; Cholesterol 56 MG per 100 g
    USDA FNDDS, FDC 2706840 (food code 27450100) · checked 2026-10-01
  2. tswe-r3-12 · USDA FNDDS, dataset
    Tuna salad with egg (FNDDS 27450100, fdc_id 2706840): 1 cup 238 g; Quantity not specified 119 g
    USDA FNDDS, FDC 2706840 (food code 27450100) · checked 2026-10-01
  3. tswe-r3-01 · RCT
    The TRL AUC(0-10h) of lutein and zeaxanthin increased 4-5-fold (P < 0.001), and the TRL AUC(0-10h) of carotenoid not present in eggs, including α-carotene, β-carotene, and lycopene, increased 3-8-fold (P < 0.01) for the HE meal compared with the control meal.
    Am J Clin Nutr, 2015 · checked 2026-10-01
  4. tswe-r3-02 · RCT
    The α-tocopherol 0- to 10-h AUCs (AUCs0-10 h) in TRLs was higher (P < 0.05) for the HE trial (least-squares mean ± SE: 981 ± 162 nmol/L ⋅ 10 h) than for the LE (311 ± 162 nmol/L ⋅ 10 h) and CON (117 ± 162 nmol/L ⋅10 h) trials, which did not differ from one another.
    J Nutr, 2016 · checked 2026-10-01
  5. tswe-r3-03 · RCT
    The incremental areas under the curves of serum β-carotene concentration were higher following MS than following both CON and JU.
    J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo), 2011 · checked 2026-10-01
  6. tswe-r3-10 · meta-analysis (observational)
    Egg consumption closest to 50 g/day was longitudinally linked to a lower risk of cognitive decline (pooled RR = 0.91; 95%CI = 0.83-0.99)
    J Hum Nutr Diet, 2026 · checked 2026-10-01
  7. sf-fish-r2-9 · agency advice
    1 serving is 4 ounces ... Eat 2 to 3 servings a week from the "Best Choices" list (OR 1 serving from the "Good Choices" list). ... Tuna, canned light (includes skipjack) Best Choice ... Tuna, albacore/white tuna, canned and fresh/frozen Good Choice
    FDA and EPA, Advice about Eating Fish · checked 2026-10-08
  8. sf-listeriarisk-tunasalegg-1 · agency advice
    Pregnant women and their unborn or newborn baby, adults over the age of 65, and those with weakened immune systems, are all considered to be high-risk groups that are susceptible to the serious and adverse effects of listeriosis.
    Listeria (Listeriosis), US Food and Drug Administration, At-Risk Groups · checked 2026-10-08
  9. tswe-r3-06 · meta-analysis (observational)
    The ranking order of metals based on mean concentrations (μg/g wet weight) were Fe (13.17) > Zn (9.31) > Se (2.23) > Al (1.8) > Cr (1.63) > Cu (1.52) > As (0.38) > Ni (0.33) > Pb (0.24) > Cd (0.14) > Hg (0.11) > Sn (0.1).
    Food Chem Toxicol, 2018 · checked 2026-10-01
  10. tswe-r3-07 · cohort
    To a lesser extent, children consuming "other fish (not fried) including tuna" and "fried fish or fish sticks" had 120% (95% CI: 82%, 164%), and 23% (95% CI: 2%, 51%) higher toenail concentrations, respectively, than those consuming no fish.
    Environ Res, 2024 · checked 2026-10-01
  11. tswe-r3-08 · agency advice
    Albacore tuna, also known as white tuna, typically contains three times more mercury than canned light tuna.
    US FDA, Questions and Answers from the FDA/EPA Advice about Eating Fish · checked 2026-10-01
  12. tswe-r3-09 · retrospective cohort
    Of the 123 egg yolk OFCs, 115 (93.4%) patients were tolerant and consumed egg yolk at home.
    Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol, 2026 · checked 2026-10-01
  13. tswe-r3-05 · umbrella review
    No evidence of association was found among all cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality risk between high vs. low egg consumption.
    Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis, 2025 · checked 2026-10-01
  14. tswe-r3-04 · meta-analysis of RCTs
    Egg-based intervention significantly improved WAZ (MD: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.11-0.55) and WHZ (MD: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.12-0.48). However, no significant effect was observed on HAZ (MD: 0.05; 95% CI: -0.05-0.14).
    J Nutr Sci, 2026 · checked 2026-10-01

Review. Reviewed on 2026-10-01 for evidence level, dose and population context, and claims a reader could misread. Bioma Learn has no human medical reviewer at this time, and we say so rather than invent one. Methodology. This is information, not medical advice.