BiomaLearnFoodsNutrition factsNutrientsGuidesAnswersEvidence

Tamarind: three small trials, and two answers about gallstones

The best trial on tamarind gave 20 fl oz (600 mL) a day of a 30 percent pulp juice to adults living with HIV whose triglycerides were 150 mg per dL or higher. Over 4 weeks, in 50 people aged 30 to 60, triglycerides fell by 39.8 mg per dL, a 17.3 percent drop, with a confidence interval of 11.9 to 67.7 and no change in total, LDL or HDL cholesterol. The authors describe the study as exploratory and say it was not powered to settle the question. That is 20 fl oz (600 mL) of prepared juice every day, not the way the fruit is normally eaten. The arm that moved systolic blood pressure, by 7.4 mmHg, was the weaker 10 percent juice rather than the stronger one, which is not how a dose response usually behaves. Everything known about this fruit stands on three small trials of fewer than a hundred people in total, plus a few surveys. No systematic review of tamarind exists.

Every statement here is tied to a source. The badge says what kind of evidence stands behind it: A is a meta-analysis or systematic review, E is the position of an expert body without its own analysis. How we verify →

The numbers, per 3.5 oz (100 g)

USDA entrykcalProteinFatCarbsFiber
Tamarinds, raw2392.8 g0.6 g62.5 g5.1 g

These are the USDA entries that are tamarind, not foods made from it; they differ in cut, part, pack or preparation. Linked names have a page with the full profile and per-portion figures.

As people eat it, per 3.5 oz (100 g)

As eatenkcalProteinFatCarbsFiber
Tamarind2392.8 g0.6 g62.5 g5.1 g

USDA Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies (FNDDS, release 2024-10-31): tamarind as it is prepared and served, from the recipes behind the national dietary survey, rather than a single laboratory sample.

How much is actually in it

What a real portion looks like

What your body absorbs

What cooking and storage change

What it does to your health

Safety, limits and interactions

What people believe that the data does not support

Who this works differently for

What is still unknown

The bottom line

Two national tables disagree about what is in it. USDA gives raw tamarind 0.428 mg thiamin and 92 mg magnesium per 3.5 oz (100 g), while the UK CoFID entry gives 0.29 mg thiamin and the same 92 mg magnesium, a gap of about a third on the vitamin and none on the mineral. Neither entry carries sample level variation, so nothing in the data says which figure is closer. Portions here are small. One tamarind weighs 2 g in the US dietary survey, and the trials below used 10 g a day. A figure quoted per 3.5 oz (100 g) therefore describes a quantity few people eat at one sitting, unless the pulp goes into a dish as paste. For cooking, USDA publishes retention factors by food group rather than by food, and the group here is Fruits and Fruit Juices, where dried fruit keeps 80 percent of its thiamin when baked and 95 percent when reheated, with magnesium unchanged at 100 percent both ways. The oddest finding about tamarind concerns fluoride. In 18 boys in India who finished an 18 day study on a controlled diet, 10 g of tamarind with lunch each day raised urinary fluoride from 3.5 to 4.8 mg a day. The same portion lowered urinary magnesium from 23.4 to 7.1 mg a day and urinary zinc from 332 to 253 micrograms a day. A second study, in 30 adolescent boys from a fluorosis area who had already drunk defluoridated water for 2 weeks, found that 3 weeks of added tamarind raised fluoride excretion and urinary pH further and lowered urinary calcium and copper. Both were small, both were in boys in India, and both measured urine rather than what stayed in the body. More fluoride leaving in urine is the direction that matters where the water is high in it, but both studies stopped at urine: nobody looked at bone, at teeth or at any symptom. Less magnesium and zinc leaving is harder to read, because nobody measured how much went in. The caution is gallstones, and the two studies of it disagree with each other. Among 71 patients with gallstone disease in southern India, matched to controls by age and sex, tamarind four or more times a week carried an odds ratio of 27.6, confidence interval 9.5 to 84.4. In the same region, a study nearly five times larger, 346 patients against 346 matched controls, put tamarind more than three times a week at an odds ratio of 1.76, interval 1.05 to 2.96. Odds are not risk. An odds ratio of 27.6 built on 71 cases sits in a model that also gives spicy food 6.6 and cooking oil 62, which looks like a whole cuisine measured through one ingredient. Anyone on a low FODMAP diet, the diet used for irritable bowel syndrome, has a steadier reason for care. A laboratory analysis of 20 foods eaten by minority communities in the UK found tamarind highest for fructans at 2.35 g per 3.5 oz (100 g), more than double the next food, and fructans are the class a low FODMAP diet limits. That was an assay of the food rather than a test in patients. One more survey belongs here. Among 186 adults and adolescents in Southern California, reported intake of tamarind and chili candy varied by age and ethnicity, in a paper arguing that Proposition 65 exposure assessments underestimate what people eat in a single day. That survey measured no contaminants in any food. The drug interaction layer holds no row for tamarind, and no card here covers pregnancy, so this page says nothing about either. For a fruit eaten daily across much of the world, the record is thin. Among 2947 school students aged 10 to 18 in Centre West Burkina Faso, where 36.2 percent were anemic, reporting that they ate tamarind went with 25 percent lower odds of anemia, adjusted odds ratio 0.75, interval 0.610 to 0.929. That is a cross sectional association from a food questionnaire, and in the same model washing hands and brushing teeth twice a day looked protective too, which shows how much the survey could not hold still. How tamarind is absorbed has never been studied. A search of the corpus for tamarind together with absorption, bioavailability, digestibility or uptake returned nothing, no synthesis of any kind exists, and ClinicalTrials.gov lists no registered trial. Neither the EU claims register nor 21 CFR mentions tamarind, its genus or tartaric acid, which means nobody has filed a claim rather than that a claim was tested and refused.

More from the same food group (fruits and fruit juices)

Sources

  1. tama-r4-01 · food composition datasets
    Tamarinds, raw [FDC 167763]: Thiamin 0.428 mg, Carbohydrate 62.5 g, Magnesium 92 mg per 100 g. Tamarind [CoFID 14-265]: Thiamin 0.29 mg, Carbohydrate 56.5 g, Magnesium 92 mg per 100 g.
    USDA FoodData Central SR Legacy, Tamarinds raw, FDC 167763, and CoFID 2021 code 14-265 · checked 2026-09-25
  2. tama-r4-08 · food composition analysis
    Fructans and galacto-oligosaccharides were the major FODMAPs in these foods, including channa dal (0.13 g/100 g; 0.36 g/100 g), fenugreek seeds (1.11 g/100 g; 1.27 g/100 g), guava (0.41 g/100 g; not detected), karela (not detected; 1.12 g/100 g) and tamarind (2.35 g/100 g; 0.02 g/100 g).
    Int J Food Sci Nutr, 2016 · checked 2026-09-25
  3. tama-r4-11 · portion dataset
    Tamarind | FNDDS 63148750 | 1 tamarind (62286) 2 g | Quantity not specified (90000) 2 g
    USDA FNDDS, Tamarind, FNDDS code 63148750 · checked 2026-09-25
  4. tama-r4-13 · corpus search, null result
    corpus_search.py (tamarind) AND (absorption OR bioavailability OR bioaccessib* OR digestib* OR uptake) --all-types: found 0. ctgov_search.py tamarind: nothing. interact_search.py tamarind: nothing.
    USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6, 2007, USDA Agricultural Research Service · checked 2026-09-25
  5. tama-r4-10 · retention factor dataset
    Fruits and Fruit Juices, FRUITS(DRIED),BAKED [251]: thiamin 80%, magnesium 100%. Fruits and Fruit Juices, FRUITS(DRIED),REHEATED [257]: thiamin 95%, magnesium 100%.
    USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6, 2007, USDA Agricultural Research Service · checked 2026-09-25
  6. tama-r4-02 · randomized controlled trial
    The 30% fruit pulp juice significantly reduced TG by -39.8 mg dL-1 (95% CI: -67.7, -11.9), P = 0.006, corresponding to a 17.3% reduction of the baseline TG levels, while no statistically significant effect was noted for the 10% fruit pulp juice. None of the doses had a significant effect on total cholesterol, LDL, and HDL.
    Food Funct, 2025 · checked 2026-09-25
  7. tama-r4-03 · randomized diet-controlled trial
    Each subject consumed 10 g tamarind daily with lunch for 18 days at the social welfare boys' hostel. ... Tamarind intake led to significant increase (P<0.001) in the excretion of fluoride in 24 h urine (4.8+/-0.22 mg/day) as compared to excretion on control diet (3.5+/-0.22 mg/day). However, excretion of magnesium and zinc decreased significantly (7.11+/-1.48 mg of Mg and 252.88+/-12.84 microg of Zn per day on tamarind diet as compared to 23.39+/-3.68 mg of Mg and 331.78+/-35.31 microg Zn per day on control diet).
    Eur J Clin Nutr, 2002 · checked 2026-09-25
  8. tama-r4-05 · case-control study
    Tamarind (OR 27.6; 95 % CI 9.5 to 84.4), spicy foods (OR 6.6; 95 % CI 2.8 to 16.3), and fried foods (OR 9.1; 95 % CI 2.8 to 33.2) when taken ≥ 4 times per week and cooking oil ≥ 300 mL per month (OR 62.0; p < 0.0000) increased the risk for GS.
    Indian J Gastroenterol, 2014 · checked 2026-09-25
  9. tama-r4-09 · cross-sectional survey
    Results identified root vegetables, rice, leafy greens, pasta/noodles, tea, juice, and seafood to be among the most heavily consumed foods by mass, while the daily intake of many foods such as stuffed grape leaves, tamarind/chili candy and herbs/spices varied by age and race/ethnicity, suggesting that many of Proposition 65's pollution allowances may be exacerbating issues of health inequity and environmental injustice.
    Nutrients, 2025 · checked 2026-09-25
  10. tama-r4-12 · claim register search, null result
    euclaims_search.py tamarind: nothing. euclaims_search.py Tamarindus: nothing. euclaims_search.py tartaric: nothing. claims_search.py tamarind: nothing. claims_search.py tartaric: nothing.
    EU Register on nutrition and health claims, snapshot 2026-09-21 · checked 2026-09-25
  11. tama-r4-04 · randomized controlled trial
    A randomized, diet control study was conducted in 30 subjects from a fluoride endemic area after significantly decreasing urinary fluoride excretion by supplying defluoridated water for 2 wk. ... There was a significant increase (P < 0.01) in fluoride excretion and urinary pH and a significant decrease in urinary calcium (P < 0.01) and copper (P < 0.05) excretion in the experimental group as compared with the control group.
    Nutrition, 2004 · checked 2026-09-25
  12. tama-r4-07 · cross-sectional study
    Among iron-rich foods, tamarind (aOR = 0.75; 95% CI: 0.610, 0.929) and pumpkin leaves (aOR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.605, 0.974) were associated with lower odds of anaemia.
    Matern Child Nutr, 2025 · checked 2026-09-25
  13. tama-r4-06 · case-control study
    There was significant risk of gallstone formation with the use of tamarind when consumed > 3 times a week (OR 1.76; 95% CI 1.05, 2.96; p=0.03). Higher BMI and tamarind use were significant risk factors even on multivariate logistic regression analysis (p=0.02).
    Indian J Gastroenterol, 2005 · checked 2026-09-25

Review. Reviewed on 2026-09-25 for evidence level, dose and population context, and claims a reader could misread. Bioma Learn has no human medical reviewer at this time, and we say so rather than invent one. Methodology. This is information, not medical advice.