BiomaLearnFoodsNutrientsGuidesAnswersEvidence

Tamale: the research is all about the masa

There is no research on the tamale. Every record our corpus returns under that name is the city of Tamale in Ghana. What exists instead is a literature on masa, the lime-cooked corn dough the thing is made of, and it starts with what the lime bath takes out. When visibly mouldy maize was nixtamalized, fumonisin B1 and B2 fell by 95 percent and zearalenone by 89 percent, while fumonisin B3 and deoxynivalenol dropped below detection in the grain. Then 40 adults in Kliptown, Soweto, ate either that maize or control maize, and urinary fumonisin B1, zearalenone and its metabolites came out no different between the groups (p > 0.05). Behind that null sit 40 people, a short intervention, and background exposure from other foods that stayed high the whole time. The cleaning happened in the corn. Whether it reaches the person eating is a separate question, and this trial did not show that it does. The bath also loads the corn with calcium, and phytate holds much of that calcium back. In 5 healthy women fed about 140 g of tortillas in place of breakfast, calcium absorption ran at 0.50 from an experimental low-phytate maize against 0.35 from the matching ordinary maize (P = 0.003). That is five women, one test meal each time, and a hybrid maize no tortilleria buys.

Every statement here is tied to a source. The badge says what kind of evidence stands behind it: A is a meta-analysis or systematic review, E is the position of an expert body without its own analysis. How we verify →

The numbers, per 100 g

USDA entrykcalProteinCarbsFiber
Tamales (Navajo)1536.28 g18.1 g3.1 g
Tamales, masa and pork filling (Hopi)16813.2 g18.3 g3.3 g

These are the USDA entries that are tamale, not foods made from it. Follow a name for the full profile and per-portion figures.

What your body absorbs

What cooking and storage change

Safety, limits and interactions

What people believe that the data does not support

What is still unknown

The bottom line

Masa is a poor place to put iron. In Guatemalan girls aged 12 to 13 eating corn tortillas with black bean paste, 5.5 percent of added ferrous sulfate was absorbed, against 9.0 percent when the same iron came as NaFeEDTA (P = 0.009). Those were adolescent girls in one country on one meal pattern, and the abstract does not say how many of them there were. The cheap hydrogen-reduced iron powder that real fortified masa flour uses does worse. In 24 children aged 5 to 7 fed tortillas carrying 3 mg of labelled reduced iron per 100 g, 3.8 percent was absorbed (range 2.7 to 5.3), and adding Na2EDTA moved it only to 5.1 percent (P = 0.18). The authors point out that their labelled powder had a smaller particle size than commercial elemental iron, so absorption from flour off the mill would look worse still. Folic acid was allowed into corn masa flour in the United States on a voluntary basis, and the blood tests do not show it arriving. Among 2070 Hispanic women of reproductive age aged 12 to 49 in NHANES, red blood cell folate did not differ between 2011 to 2016 and 2017 to 2018, and neither did the proportion at risk of neural tube defects. Folate rose only in the least acculturated groups, from 894 to 1018 nmol/L in women born abroad and resident under 15 years, and from 941 to 1034 nmol/L in primarily Spanish-speaking women. Because the fortification is voluntary, how much fortified masa reached any of these women is unknown, and two survey cycles is a short window to look through. The whole published record on the question is 8 studies covering 20123 women, and the review that gathered them graded the certainty of every outcome low to very low. One caution here, and it belongs to the corn rather than to the cook. Among 915 Mexican adults aged 40 and over surveyed in 2018 to 2019, every maize tortilla consumed went with 2.0 percent more aflatoxin B1-lysine in serum (95% CI 0.6 to 3.4), and 2.8 percent (1.1 to 4.6) for a tortilla made from homemade masa. That is a cross-sectional survey, which cannot say the tortilla caused the level, and the adduct it measures marks recent exposure rather than any disease. The estimates for tortillas from a tortilleria or from maize flour were minimal, so where the maize came from and how it was stored is the part worth caring about. Past that our shelf is thin, and thin in a particular way. What we hold on children is the two absorption trials above, in children aged 5 to 7 and in girls aged 12 to 13, and what we hold anywhere near pregnancy is the folic acid work in women of reproductive age. On tamales alongside a medicine we hold nothing at all, because the interaction layer behind these pages is organised by nutrient and a dish has no entry in it. Our two USDA rows are a Navajo tamale and a Hopi masa and pork tamale, both legacy records, so we can give you no measured spread between samples and no retention figure for what steaming does. Nothing in the corpus studies the tamale itself, the filling, the fat, the husk or the portion.

Sources

  1. tml-r2-02 · controlled feeding trial
    Calcium fortification of maize has been achieved for millennia in Central America by the process of nixtamalization. Bioavailability of calcium is, however, compromised by phytate, which is present in large quantities in maize kernels and is only modestly reduced by nixtamalization...Mean fractional absorption of calcium from tortillas prepared from the low-phytate maize (0.50 +/- 0.03) was significantly (P = 0.003) greater than that from tortillas prepared from the control maize (0.35 +/- 0.07).
    Am J Clin Nutr, 2005 · checked 2026-09-24
  2. tml-r2-03 · randomised controlled trial
    Geometric mean iron bioavailability from test meals fortified with ferrous sulfate was 5.5% and was significantly higher in test meals fortified with NaFeEDTA (9.0%; P = 0.009, paired t test).
    Am J Clin Nutr, 2002 · checked 2026-09-24
  3. tml-r2-04 · randomised controlled trial
    When normalized to 40% absorption of the reference dose, the geometric mean (+/-range 1 SD) bioavailability of reduced iron in tortilla was 3.8% (2.7-5.3). The addition of Na(2)EDTA, tended to increase it (P = 0.18) to 5.1% (2.8-9.2).
    J Nutr, 2004 · checked 2026-09-24
  4. tml-r2-01 · randomised controlled trial
    Nixtamalization achieved a reduction in fumonisin B3 and deoxynivalenol (DON) to unquantifiable or undetectable levels in maize, while reducing fumonisin B1 (FB1), fumonisin B2, and zearalenone (ZEN) by 95%, 95%, and 89%, respectively...Biomarker analysis revealed that after consumption of either control or nixtamalized maize, urinary levels of FB1, ZEN, and its metabolites α- and β-zearalenol (α- and β-ZEL) did not show significant differences between groups (p > 0.05).
    Toxins (Basel), 2025 · checked 2026-09-24
  5. tml-r2-05 · cross-sectional study
    After multivariable adjustment, for every 30 g of maize consumed (1 tortilla equivalent), circulating AFB1-lys incremented by 2.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.9%, 3.4%]. For every maize tortilla consumed, the concentration of circulating AFB1-lys was 2.0% (95% CI: 0.6%, 3.4%) higher. The corresponding estimate for homemade masa tortilla was 2.8% (95% CI: 1.1%, 4.6%).
    Am J Clin Nutr, 2025 · checked 2026-09-24
  6. tml-r2-06 · cross-sectional study
    RBC folate concentration (adjusted geometric mean) among Hispanic women of reproductive age did not differ between 2011-2016 and 2017-2018, though RBC folate concentration increased significantly among lesser acculturated Hispanic women consuming ECGP only...By subpopulation, we observed no significant changes in the proportion at risk of NTDs (<748 nmol/L) and no changes in the model-based estimated NTD rates following voluntary corn masa fortification.
    Nutrients, 2021 · checked 2026-09-24
  7. tml-r2-07 · systematic review of observational evidence
    The certainty of evidence, assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations framework, ranged from low to very low across outcomes.
    BMC Public Health, 2025 · checked 2026-09-24

Review. Reviewed on 2026-09-24 for evidence level, dose and population context, and claims a reader could misread. Bioma Learn has no human medical reviewer at this time, and we say so rather than invent one. Methodology. This is information, not medical advice.