BiomaLearnFoodsNutrition factsNutrientsGuidesAnswersEvidence

Shortening in the US: the trans fat is gone, the saturated fat is not

Shortening earned its bad name from trans fat, and the trans fat in the US version has been legally removed. In 2015 the FDA ruled that partially hydrogenated oils are no longer generally recognized as safe, and after June 18, 2018 manufacturers could not add them to most foods. The partially hydrogenated shortenings still listed in the USDA table below describe the product before that ruling. What replaced it is mostly palm. In randomized trials of at least 2 weeks, palm oil raised LDL cholesterol by 12 mg/dL (95% CI 7.7 to 16; metric: 0.31 mmol/L, 0.20 to 0.42) against vegetable oils low in saturated fat. That is palm oil as an ingredient, not shortening as sold. A tablespoon of generic shortening weighs 12 g and carries about 106 calories and 3 g of saturated fat.

Every statement here is tied to a source. The badge says what kind of evidence stands behind it: A is a meta-analysis or systematic review, E is the position of an expert body without its own analysis. How we verify →

The numbers, per 3.5 oz (100 g)

USDA entrykcalProteinFatCarbsFiber
Shortening, confectionery, fractionated palm8840 g100 g0 g0 g
Shortening, household, lard and vegetable oil9000 g100 g0 g0 g
Shortening, household, soybean (partially hydrogenated)-cottonseed (partially hydrogenated)8840 g100 g0 g0 g
Shortening, industrial, soy (partially hydrogenated ) and corn for frying8840 g100 g0 g0 g
Shortening, industrial, soy (partially hydrogenated ) for baking and confections8840 g100 g0 g0 g
Shortening, industrial, soy (partially hydrogenated), pourable liquid fry shortening8840 g100 g0 g0 g
Shortening, multipurpose, soybean (hydrogenated) and palm (hydrogenated)8840 g100 g0 g0 g
Shortening, special purpose for baking, soybean (hydrogenated) palm and cottonseed8840 g100 g0 g0 g
Shortening, special purpose for cakes and frostings, soybean (hydrogenated)8840 g100 g0 g0 g
Shortening, vegetable, household, composite8840 g100 g0 g0 g

These are the USDA entries that are shortening, not foods made from it; they differ in cut, part, pack or preparation. Linked names have a page with the full profile and per-portion figures.

As people eat it, per 3.5 oz (100 g)

As eatenkcalProteinFatCarbsFiber
Shortening, NS as to vegetable or animal8840 g100 g0 g0 g

USDA Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies (FNDDS, release 2024-10-31): shortening as it is prepared and served, from the recipes behind the national dietary survey, rather than a single laboratory sample.

How much is actually in it

What a real portion looks like

What your body absorbs

What cooking and storage change

What it does to your health

Safety, limits and interactions

What people believe that the data does not support

Who this works differently for

What is still unknown

The bottom line

The old risk was real and specific. Cohort studies link industrial trans fat with 42% more coronary heart disease (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.92), and trans fat from dairy and meat showed no such link. In 10 randomized trials, 1.3 to 13.2 g a day of dairy trans fat left every lipid marker unchanged except HDL, which fell by 1.9 mg/dL (0.05 mmol/L). The problem was the factory kind. The newer hard fats are less studied. A review of 233 studies counted 87 raw materials used as replacements, mostly palm stearin that is interesterified, mainly in margarine and shortening. In 20 adults, interesterifying a palm fat did not change how a 50 g fat meal was digested over 8 hours. In 47 adults over 6 weeks, a palmitic-rich and a stearic-rich interesterified fat gave the same total to HDL cholesterol ratio, a difference of 0.05. That trial compared two hard fats with each other, and its authors did not look at longer-term effects. Very hot frying adds a little trans fat back. In laboratory heating of 21 oils, trans fat barely moved below 200 C and rose by 0.38% for every 10 C between 200 and 240 C. Those were oils, not shortening. Who should be careful. WHO advises adults to keep trans fat below 1% of energy, under 2.2 g a day on 2000 calories, and attributes more than 278,000 deaths a year to the industrial kind by modeling. In pregnant women, higher blood levels of industrial trans fat isomers were linked to preeclampsia and poorer fetal growth across 13 mostly observational studies, with no pooled size given. For children, the evidence is about saturated fat in general. In trials in ages 2 to 19, advice to eat less of it lowered LDL by 5 mg/dL (0.13 mmol/L).

More from the same food group (fats and oils)

Sources

  1. shrt-r4-01 · national food composition dataset
    FNDDS 2710167 Shortening, NS as to vegetable or animal (81203000, Margarine): Energy 884 KCAL/100 g · Fatty acids, total saturated 24.98 G · Vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) 6.13 MG
    USDA FNDDS 2021-2023 (FoodData Central), Shortening, NS as to vegetable or animal, food code 81203000, fdc_id 2710167 · checked 2026-09-29
  2. shrt-r4-02 · national food composition dataset
    FNDDS 2710167 Shortening, NS: 1 tablespoon 12 g · 1 cup 192 g · Energy 106.1 KCAL/tbsp · Fatty acids, total saturated 3.0 G/tbsp
    USDA FNDDS 2021-2023 (FoodData Central), Shortening, NS as to vegetable or animal, food code 81203000, fdc_id 2710167 · checked 2026-09-29
  3. shrt-r4-03 · randomized crossover trial
    Interesterification did not modify fat digestion, postprandial lipemia, or lipid metabolism measured by stable isotope and DGM analysis.
    Am J Clin Nutr, 2021 · checked 2026-09-29
  4. shrt-r4-07 · meta-analysis of laboratory studies
    Overall, heating to temperatures <200 °C had no appreciable impact on different TFA levels. Between 200 and 240 °C, levels of C18:2 t (0.05% increase per 10 °C rise in temperature, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.05%), C18:3t (0.18%, 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.21%), and total TFA (0.38%, 95% CI: 0.20 to 0.55%) increased with temperature.
    Nutrients, 2022 · checked 2026-09-29
  5. shrt-r4-04 · randomized crossover trial
    No significant differences were observed in total:HDL cholesterol ratio between interventions (stearic compared with palmitic mean difference: 0.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.08, 0.18).
    Am J Clin Nutr, 2025 · checked 2026-09-29
  6. shrt-r4-05 · meta-analysis of RCTs
    This effect was observed in randomized trials (0.31 mmol/L; 95% CI: 0.20, 0.42 mmol/L) but not in nonrandomized trials (0.03 mmol/L; 95% CI: -0.15, 0.20 mmol/L; P-difference = 0.02).
    J Nutr, 2015 · checked 2026-09-29
  7. shrt-r4-06 · meta-analysis of observational studies
    Industrial, but not ruminant, trans fats were associated with CHD mortality (1.18 (1.04 to 1.33) v 1.01 (0.71 to 1.43)) and CHD (1.42 (1.05 to 1.92) v 0.93 (0.73 to 1.18)).
    BMJ, 2015 · checked 2026-09-29
  8. shrt-r4-12 · agency position
    WHO's recommendation for adults is to limit consumption of trans fat to less than 1% of total energy intake, which is less than 2.2 g per day for a 2000-calorie diet. ... More than 278 000 deaths each year globally can be attributed to intake of industrially produced trans fat.
    WHO, Trans fat fact sheet · checked 2026-09-29
  9. shrt-r4-09 · meta-analysis of RCTs
    Among 10 RCTs, there were no significant differences in mean difference for any lipid biomarkers except for a slight decrease in HDL-C (mean difference: -0.05 mmol/L; confidence interval: -0.10 to -0.00) for TFA-enriched vs. regular dairy foods.
    Nutr Res, 2026 · checked 2026-09-29
  10. shrt-r4-11 · agency position
    In 2015, FDA released its final determination that Partially Hydrogenated Oils (PHOs) are not Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS). ... For the majority of uses of PHOs, June 18, 2018, remains the date after which manufacturers cannot add PHOs to foods.
    FDA, Final Determination Regarding Partially Hydrogenated Oils (Removing Trans Fat) · checked 2026-09-29
  11. shrt-r4-08 · systematic review of observational studies
    Biomarker-based studies consistently showed that higher proportions of these isomers were associated with increased preeclampsia risk and reduced fetal growth indicators. In contrast, dietary intake studies showed no consistent associations, likely due to their limited capacity to distinguish iTFAs from ruminant TFAs.
    Nutr Res, 2026 · checked 2026-09-29
  12. shrt-r4-10 · meta-analysis of RCTs
    Compared with control diets, there was a highly statistically significant effect of reduced SFA intake on total cholesterol (mean difference (MD) -0.16 mmol/l, [95% confidence interval (CI): -0.25 to -0.07]), LDL cholesterol (MD -0.13 mmol/l [95% CI:-0.22 to -0.03]) and diastolic blood pressure (MD -1.45 mmol/l [95% CI:-2.34 to -0.56]).
    PLoS One, 2017 · checked 2026-09-29
  13. shrt-r4-13 · scoping review
    A total of 87 different raw materials were cited as trans fats substitutes in the selected studies, with palm stearin being the most frequent. The processing methods were categorized in 8 groups, with interesterification being the most cited (46% of studies). Food items belonging to 15 food groups were found to contain trans fats substitutes, mainly margarine, shortenings, and spreads.
    Nutr Rev, 2025 · checked 2026-09-29

Review. Reviewed on 2026-09-29 for evidence level, dose and population context, and claims a reader could misread. Bioma Learn has no human medical reviewer at this time, and we say so rather than invent one. Methodology. This is information, not medical advice.