BiomaLearnFoodsNutrition factsNutrientsGuidesAnswersEvidence

Schar gluten-free bread: what going without gluten changes, and for whom

Schar makes gluten-free bread, and the strongest trial here is about expectation more than gluten. In a randomized trial of 83 adults with self-reported non-celiac gluten sensitivity, those told they were eating gluten who really were scored 16.6 mm on a gut symptom scale, against 6.9 mm for those eating gluten without knowing it. The gap was 9.6 mm (95% CI 3.0 to 16.2), in a one-day test with oat bread. Those were people with self-reported sensitivity, not celiac disease. The two USDA records for Schar white bread and rolls list 441 to 593 mg of sodium per 3.5 oz (100 g), and up to 0.615 mg of thiamin, 51 percent of the Daily Value, from added vitamins, in 2019 entries that may not match today's recipe. Gluten-free bread as a category leans toward a high glycemic index. In a meta-analysis of 132 gluten-free bread samples, 60.7 percent scored high, though 11 of the 18 studies tested in vitro and 14 used research recipes instead of shop loaves.

Every statement here is tied to a source. The badge says what kind of evidence stands behind it: A is a meta-analysis or systematic review, E is the position of an expert body without its own analysis. How we verify →

The numbers, per 3.5 oz (100 g)

USDA entrykcalProteinFatCarbsFiber
Schar, Gluten-Free, Classic White Rolls2393.34 g2.65 g50.5 g5.1 g
Schar, Gluten-Free, Wheat-Free, Classic White Bread2403.81 g4.47 g46.1 g5.1 g

These are the USDA entries that are schar, not foods made from it; they differ in cut, part, pack or preparation. Linked names have a page with the full profile and per-portion figures.

How much is actually in it

What your body absorbs

What it does to your health

Safety, limits and interactions

What people believe that the data does not support

Who this works differently for

What is still unknown

The bottom line

Compared with regular bread, gluten-free bread tends to carry less protein. Among 3213 Australian supermarket foods surveyed in 2013, gluten-free breads had 32 percent less protein and no better Health Star Rating. In a Spanish comparison of labels on 621 gluten-free and 600 regular products, gluten-free bread had more total and saturated fat, mostly from palm oil. Of 8 non-wholegrain gluten-free breads sold across Brazil, 6 had a high glycemic index, and nutrients varied between lots of the same brand, with Schar not named among them. In a randomized crossover of 12 healthy adults, two days of gluten-free bread left a fasting colon volume of 9.8 fl oz (289 ml) against 7.2 fl oz (212 ml) after normal bread, with no difference in symptoms or stomach emptying. That is a small mechanistic test. A review of 80 controlled diet trials associated gluten-free diets with fewer gut bacteria that make short-chain fatty acids, based on within-group changes without pooled numbers. Who should be careful. For people with celiac disease the question is hidden gluten. A meta-analysis of 40 studies, mostly from high-income countries, found gluten above 20 mg/kg in 9.52 percent of labeled gluten-free products and in 28.32 percent of foods that are gluten-free by nature. The FDA rule requires any gluten in a food labeled gluten-free to be below 20 ppm. That is a labeling limit. It was not set as a safety threshold for every patient. Across 27,806 food samples, 0.51 percent held more than 200 mg/kg, the level at which a normal 3.5 to 11 oz (100 to 300 g) portion could pass 10 mg of gluten a day. Across 45 observational studies of celiac patients on a gluten-free diet, average BMI rose by 1.14 kg/m2, and 9 percent moved into the overweight or obese range while 20 percent moved to a lower category, with high variation and a moderate to high risk of bias. In children with both type 1 diabetes and celiac disease, a gluten-free diet was linked with HbA1c 0.64 points lower than a standard diet, in 7 non-randomized studies the authors rate as low quality. In type 1 diabetes alone the difference did not reach significance.

More from the same food group (baked products)

Sources

  1. schr-r3-01 · USDA FoodData Central SR Legacy, dataset
    Schar, Gluten-Free, Classic White Rolls (FDC 168008, SR Legacy, Baked Products): thiamin 0.615 mg per 100 g = 51% DV; riboflavin 0.48 mg = 37% DV; sodium 593 mg = 26% DV; Foundation samples 0, CoFID match none
    USDA FoodData Central, SR Legacy, FDC 168008 · checked 2026-09-29
  2. schr-r3-06 · cross-sectional
    A cross-sectional study analysing the nutritional differences between 621 GFP and 600 GCC based on labelling information was conducted. ... Results showed that GCC had higher protein content than GFP, especially in flour, bread, pasta and pizza. Bread had higher total and saturated fat contents in the GFP in which palm oil was the main fat used.
    Eur J Clin Nutr, 2019 · checked 2026-09-29
  3. schr-r3-04 · meta-analysis of product tests
    The 18 selected studies resulted in a pooled sample size of 132 GFB. ... The pooled analysis estimates an overall percentage of 60.7% (95% CI: 40.2–78.1%) of high GIs (≥70) (Table 2, Figure 2). Only 18.2% (95% CI: 11.7–27.2%) of the bread was classified as low GI (≤55), evidencing a high glycemic profile for GFB.
    Glycemic Index of Gluten-Free Bread and Their Main Ingredients, Foods, 2021 (PMC7996770) · checked 2026-09-29
  4. schr-r3-05 · cross-sectional
    Significant differences between manufacturing lots of each brand and between different gluten-free bread samples were found. ... Samples showed predominantly refined starch and high glycemic index profile. Most samples (75%, n = 6) of the non-whole gluten-free bread (n = 8) presented high glycemic index (GI).
    Nutrients, 2020 · checked 2026-09-29
  5. schr-r3-02 · randomized controlled trial
    Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1; blocks of eight; stratified by site and gender) to one of four groups based on the expectation to consume gluten-containing (E+) or gluten-free (E-) oat bread for breakfast and lunch (two slices each) and actual intake of gluten-containing (G+) or gluten-free (G-) oat bread. ... Mean overall gastrointestinal symptom score was significantly higher for E+G+ (16·6 mm [95% CI 13·1 to 20·0]) than for E-G+ (6·9 mm [3·5 to 10·4]; difference 9·6 mm [95% CI 3·0 to 16·2]
    Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2024 · checked 2026-09-29
  6. schr-r3-03 · randomized crossover trial
    A total of twelve healthy participants completed this randomised, mechanistic, open-label, three-way crossover study. ... Fasting transverse colonic volume after the 2-d preload was significantly higher after GFB compared with NGCB and AGCB with a dose-dependent response (289 (SEM 96) v. 212 (SEM 74) v. 179 (SEM 87) ml, respectively; P=0·02). ... However, gastric half-emptying time was not different between breads nor were study day GI symptoms, postprandial SBWC, colonic volume and gas content.
    Br J Nutr, 2016 · checked 2026-09-29
  7. schr-r3-12 · systematic review
    Eighty studies met the eligibility criteria, trialling 13 distinct dietary interventions: ... In contrast, Western, animal-based, low FODMAP, ketogenic, and gluten-free diets were associated with a reduced abundance of SCFA-producing bacteria.
    J Transl Med, 2026 · checked 2026-09-29
  8. schr-r3-08 · meta-analysis of surveys
    The results show that in the gluten-free foods analysed, the overall prevalence of gluten contamination was estimated at 15.12% (95% CI: 9.56%-21.70%), with more than 20 mg/kg of gluten. Naturally gluten-free foods were significantly more contaminated than labelled gluten-free products and than meals in food services (28.32%; 9.52%; 4.66% respectively; p < 0.001).
    Br J Nutr, 2022 · checked 2026-09-29
  9. schr-r3-07 · cross-sectional
    A total of 3213 food products across ten food categories were included. On average, GF plain dry pasta scored nearly 0.5 stars less (P< 0.001) compared with non-GF products; however, there were no significant differences in the mean HSR for breads or ready-to-eat breakfast cereals (P≥ 0.42 for both). Relative to non-GF foods, GF products had consistently lower average protein content across all the three core food groups, in particular for pasta and breads (52 and 32% less, P< 0.001 for both). ... The consumption of GF products is unlikely to confer health benefits, unless there is clear evidence of gluten intolerance.
    Br J Nutr, 2015 · checked 2026-09-29
  10. schr-r3-10 · agency guidance
    Also, any unavoidable presence of gluten in the food must be less than 20 ppm.
    US FDA, Questions and Answers on the Gluten-Free Food Labeling Final Rule, content current as of 06/30/2022 · checked 2026-09-29
  11. schr-r3-11 · meta-analysis of observational studies
    Forty-five studies were selected (7959 patients with celiac disease and 20 524 healthy controls). ... During a GFD, the mean BMI increased significantly (mean difference = 1.14 kg/m2 [95%CI, 0.68-1.60 kg/m2]; I2 = 82.8%; P < 0.001), but only 9% of patients (95%CI, 7%-12%; I2 = 80.0%) changed from the underweight/normal BMI category to the overweight/obese category, while 20% (95%CI, 11%-29%; I2 = 85.8%) moved into a lower BMI category. CONCLUSION: Most celiac patients had a normal BMI at presentation, although the mean BMI was significantly lower than that of controls. A GFD does not increase the risk of becoming overweight/obese, especially in children.
    Nutr Rev, 2023 · checked 2026-09-29
  12. schr-r3-13 · meta-analysis of observational studies
    Seven studies involving 355 T1DM patients were included. ... Patients withT1DM alone had similar HbA1c [pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) = -0.5, 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.0 to 0.1, P = 0.079] and IDAA1c (pooled WMD = -0.4, 95%CI: -0.9 to 0.1, P = 0.095) levels after a GFD and a standard diet. In children and adolescents withT1DM and CD, a GFD was associated with a significantly lower HbA1c compared with a standard diet (pooled WMD = -0.64, 95%CI: -1.22 to -0.05, P = 0.034).
    Arch Endocrinol Metab, 2025 · checked 2026-09-29
  13. schr-r3-09 · scoping review
    From 4044 screened studies, 59 met the inclusion criteria (1993-2024, 28 countries). The analysis identified 27,806 food samples, predominantly analyzed by sandwich ELISA R5. Of these, 3100 (11 %) had a gluten content exceeding 20 mg/kg, 359 samples (1.3 %) contained >80 mg/kg, and 142 samples (0.51 %) > 200 mg/kg. ... Regular portions (100-300 g) of foods >200 mg/kg could exceed the 10 mg/day safety threshold.
    Clin Nutr ESPEN, 2026 · checked 2026-09-29

Review. Reviewed on 2026-09-29 for evidence level, dose and population context, and claims a reader could misread. Bioma Learn has no human medical reviewer at this time, and we say so rather than invent one. Methodology. This is information, not medical advice.