BiomaLearnFoodsNutrientsGuidesAnswersEvidence

Raisins: well studied, and the results stay modest

The strongest evidence on this page never tests raisins on their own. Across 17 randomised trials with 668 people, grape products carrying polyphenols lowered C-reactive protein by a standardised mean difference of 0.23 (95 percent CI 0.05 to 0.41, P = 0.013). That effect sat at doses above 500 mg a day and in trials running 12 weeks or more. Those trials pooled grape seed extract, grape extract, juice and raisins together, and C-reactive protein is a marker of inflammation that nobody feels move. A second synthesis, of 118 randomised trials of foods sold for endurance, found no significant effect for raisins. Grape, beetroot, cherry and pomegranate did show effects there, and the authors describe even those as trivial. Against a sports product, raisins held their ground. Ten endurance-trained men aged 18 to 33 rode two hours and then a 10 km time trial, finishing in 17.3 minutes on sun-dried raisins and 17.3 minutes on isocaloric jelly beans, with no difference in blood glucose. Ten men in one protocol shows raisins were not worse, which is weaker than a proof of equivalence. As a carbohydrate food they test low in two groups and moderate in a third: a glycaemic index of 49.4 in sedentary adults, 49.6 in prediabetic adults and 62.3 in trained adults, three groups of about ten people with no significant difference between them.

Every statement here is tied to a source. The badge says what kind of evidence stands behind it: A is a meta-analysis or systematic review, E is the position of an expert body without its own analysis. How we verify →

The numbers, per 100 g

USDA entrykcalProteinCarbsFiber
Raisins, dark, seedless (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program)2993.3 g79.3 g4.5 g
Raisins, golden, seedless3013.28 g80 g3.3 g
Raisins, seeded2962.52 g78.5 g6.8 g

These are the USDA entries that are raisins, not foods made from it. Follow a name for the full profile and per-portion figures.

How much is actually in it

What your body absorbs

What it does to your health

Safety, limits and interactions

What people believe that the data does not support

Who this works differently for

What is still unknown

The bottom line

What the trials support is a swap, raisins in place of the snack you would otherwise reach for. Fifty-one people with type 2 diabetes ate dark raisins instead of processed snacks for 12 weeks, and post-meal glucose came out 23 percent lower (P = 0.024) and systolic pressure 8.7 mmHg lower (P = 0.035). HbA1c, the measure of longer term control, moved 0.12 percent and did not reach significance, and the comparator was crisps and biscuits rather than nothing. In 55 patients with fatty liver, 28 of them swapped snacks for 36 g a day of currants for 24 weeks, and fasting glucose and interleukin-6 fell only in that arm, with 50 of the 55 finishing. Currants are dried Corinth grapes, a close relative of the raisin and a different product. Left to snack freely after school, 26 normal-weight children aged 8 to 11 ate about 75 g of raisins, the same weight as the potato chips on offer. Their calories across the whole day still came out lower than on the afternoon they were given cookies, over four afternoons that measured eating and nothing about weight. Teeth are one caution with real data behind it. In 20 children aged 7 to 11, raisins alone never took plaque pH below 6 across half an hour, while the commercial raisin bran cereal took it lower than the raisins themselves did. Plaque pH over 30 minutes is a proxy for caries risk and not a count of cavities. Dried fruit sold loose raises a second question. Salmonella enterica was found in 29 percent of 70 raisin samples taken from bulk bins in shops in Queretaro, Mexico, alongside 40 percent of pecans and 52 percent of sun-dried tomatoes. Dried fruit is dry enough that the bacterium survives without growing, and one Mexican city with open bins says nothing about packaged raisins elsewhere. We found no trial of raisins with any medicine, and none on kidney stones. Two results are worth carrying home as limits. Ninety grams of raisins a day for four weeks left C-reactive protein, malondialdehyde, flow-mediated dilatation and pulse wave velocity unchanged in 36 healthy smokers, in an open label trial. In 18 prospective cohorts covering 451291 adults and 145492 new cases of hypertension, raisins or grapes fell on the lower-risk side, and each fruit subtype in that analysis rests on two to five studies. The summary figures there, 0.93 per 200 g a day, describe fruit as a whole. Even the composition is thin: raisins were one of seven foods that together supplied 15.5 percent of the raffinose eaten by 100 Italian adults, prebiotic sugars that no food table lists, and that share cannot be split between the seven.

Sources

  1. rais-r4-12 · food analysis and intake estimation
    Wheat bran, raspberries, chestnuts, walnuts, raisins, soy milk, and soy yoghurt overall accounted for 3.9% of kestose, 1.2% of nystose, 0% of 1F-β-fructofuranosylnystose, 15.5% of raffinose, and 8.3% of stachyose total intakes.
    Nutrients, 2025 · checked 2026-09-24
  2. rais-r4-08 · clinical trial, glycaemic index measurement
    The GI of raisins was low (GI, < or = 55) in the S (49.4 +/- 7.4) and P (49.6 +/- 4.8) groups and was moderate (GI, 55-69) in the A group (62.3 +/- 10.5), but there were no differences among the subject groups (P = .437).
    Nutr Res, 2008 · checked 2026-09-24
  3. rais-r4-01 · meta-analysis of RCTs
    Based on the results, grape products containing polyphenols decreased CRP levels significantly (SMD = −0·229; 95 % CI −0·41, −0·05; P = 0·013).
    Br J Nutr, 2021 · checked 2026-09-24
  4. rais-r4-11 · meta-analysis of prospective studies
    Inverse associations were observed for apples or pears, blueberries, raisins or grapes, avocado, broccoli, carrots and lettuce, while positive associations were observed for cantaloupe, Brussels sprouts, cruciferous vegetables, and total and fried potatoes (n = 2-5).
    Eur J Nutr, 2023 · checked 2026-09-24
  5. rais-r4-09 · randomised controlled trial
    Consumption of raisins or eRB did not reduce plaque pH below 6 over the 30-minute testing period.
    Pediatr Dent, 2009 · checked 2026-09-24
  6. rais-r4-10 · prevalence survey
    The prevalence of S. enterica in chocolate sprinkles, raisins, peanuts, pecans, and sun-dried tomatoes was 26, 29, 31, 40, and 52%, respectively.
    J Food Prot, 2022 · checked 2026-09-24
  7. rais-r4-02 · meta-analysis of RCTs
    For polyphenol-rich foods, benefits were found for grape, (nitrate-depleted) beetroot, French maritime pine, Montmorency cherry and pomegranate, while no significant effects were evident for New Zealand blackcurrant, cocoa, ginseng, green tea or raisins.
    J Int Soc Sports Nutr, 2021 · checked 2026-09-24
  8. rais-r4-07 · randomised controlled trial
    Consuming SDRs or SJBs during 120 minutes of intense cycling results in similar subsequent TT performances and are equally effective in maintaining blood glucose levels during exercise.
    J Strength Cond Res, 2011 · checked 2026-09-24
  9. rais-r4-03 · randomised controlled trial
    In this study, compared to alternative processed snacks, those who consumed raisins had a significant 23% reduction in postprandial glucose levels (P = 0.024).
    Phys Sportsmed, 2015 · checked 2026-09-24
  10. rais-r4-05 · randomised controlled trial
    Significant differences between the two arms post-intervention were observed in fasting glucose and in IL-6 levels, these being significantly decreased only in Currant patients.
    Food Funct, 2016 · checked 2026-09-24
  11. rais-r4-06 · randomised controlled trial
    Raisins and grapes led to lower cumulative food intake (breakfast + morning snack + lunch + after-school snack) (P < 0.001), while the cookies increased cumulative food intake (P < 0.001) compared to the other snacks.
    J Food Sci, 2013 · checked 2026-09-24
  12. rais-r4-04 · randomised controlled trial
    No effect of daily raisin consumption was observed on markers assessed between baseline and week 4 in either arm.
    Food Res Int, 2017 · checked 2026-09-24

Review. Reviewed on 2026-09-24 for evidence level, dose and population context, and claims a reader could misread. Bioma Learn has no human medical reviewer at this time, and we say so rather than invent one. Methodology. This is information, not medical advice.