BiomaLearnFoodsNutrition factsNutrientsGuidesAnswersEvidence

Potato or sweet potato: closer than their reputations

Both crops have been tested for how much of their iron the body takes up, though never in the same study. In isotope trials on iron-depleted women, 28.4% of the iron in a regular yellow potato meal was absorbed in Peru against 5.8% from a regular orange sweet potato in Malawi, two separate studies in different countries with different meal sizes, so the gap cannot be put down to the crop alone. The amounts stay small. In 28 young iron-depleted women in the Peruvian highlands, a 16 oz (460 g) meal of regular yellow potato gave 16.6% absorption and about 0.24 mg of absorbed iron. Raw, the two carry similar potassium, 446 to 486 mg per 3.5 oz (100 g) across red, gold and russet potatoes and orange sweet potato in USDA samples. Vitamin C varies more inside the potato family, from 10.9 mg in raw russet to 21 to 23 mg in red and gold, with raw orange sweet potato at 14.8 mg. We found no trial comparing the two head to head on blood sugar or any health outcome.

Every statement here is tied to a source. The badge says what kind of evidence stands behind it: A is a meta-analysis or systematic review, E is the position of an expert body without its own analysis. How we verify →

We have no USDA entry for potato | sweet potato itself in this cohort. The evidence below stands on published studies rather than on a composition table, and we would rather say that than show you a number for something else.

How much is actually in it

What a real portion looks like

What your body absorbs

What cooking and storage change

What it does to your health

What people believe that the data does not support

Who this works differently for

What is still unknown

The bottom line

A medium baked potato is coded at 285 g and about 265 calories in US survey data, and a medium sweet potato at 150 g and about 173 calories, both recalculated from 100 g values. Per 100 g the sweet potato carries more energy, 115 against 93 calories, so the gap comes from size. Baking a potato in its skin keeps about 80% of its vitamin C and all of its potassium by the USDA retention table, a 1975 table with no factor for carotenoids and no code of its own for sweet potato. In 37 women in the Peruvian highlands, 25.5% of the zinc in 18 oz (500 g) of regular boiled potatoes was absorbed, about 0.40 mg. For ordinary potatoes, the cooking method shows up in the data more than the potato does. In three US cohorts of 205,107 adults followed up to 36 years, each extra 3 servings a week of French fries went with a 20% higher type 2 diabetes rate (HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.28). Baked, boiled or mashed potatoes showed no link (HR 1.01, 0.98 to 1.05), and total potato went with 5% higher. A meta-analysis of 103 observational studies found total potato unrelated to hypertension (RR 1.07, 0.95 to 1.21) or cardiovascular disease (RR 0.97, 0.91 to 1.03), while fried potato went with 16% higher diabetes risk (RR 1.16, 1.04 to 1.30). Seven pooled cohorts of 110,063 adults tied 1 or more weekly servings of fried potato to 10% higher hypertension risk (4% to 17%). All of this is observational, so it shows association and cannot show cause. The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2023 review, working from evidence it calls very limited, found no substantial chronic disease risk from moderate intake and advised limiting French fries. In the European EPIC cohort of 341,519 adults, the highest quarter of potato intake went with 51% higher risk of ulcerative colitis (HR 1.51, 1.05 to 2.17), from only 379 cases and with preparation not separated. We found no study of sweet potato and chronic disease. The one sweet potato outcome we have comes from a different setting: a review of 20 studies in Mozambique found that bringing in orange-fleshed sweet potato improved vitamin A status in women and children, without giving a size for the effect. The EU has refused a claim that a potato extract reduces body weight in overweight people, and claims that potato protein isolate increases satiety or supports weight control. This page has no card on safety, allergy or drug interactions for either crop. The one finding about a specific group is pregnancy. A meta-analysis of 6 studies covering 29,288 pregnancies linked each daily 2.8 oz (80 g) serving of potato with 22% higher gestational diabetes risk (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.42), from few studies and observational data. A larger 2025 meta-analysis found no gestational diabetes link for fried potato (RR 1.03, 0.97 to 1.09), a different exposure from total potato, and neither can show cause.

Each food on its own

Questions answered from the trials

Sources

  1. pvs-r3-01 · reference dataset
    Potatoes, red, without skin, raw: Potassium, K 472.0 MG (range 427.0-516.0, 8 samples); Potatoes, gold, without skin, raw: 445.8 MG (342.0-539.0, 8); Potatoes, russet, without skin, raw: 450.1 MG (407.0-530.0, 8); Sweet potatoes, orange flesh, without skin, raw: 486.4 MG (374.0-521.0, 8)
    USDA FoodData Central, Foundation Foods, release 2026-04-30 · checked 2026-10-02
  2. pvs-r3-02 · reference dataset
    Potatoes, red, without skin, raw: Vitamin C 21.29 MG (range 14.2-29.6, 8 samples); Potatoes, gold, without skin, raw: 23.3 MG (16.6-30.3, 8); Potatoes, russet, without skin, raw: 10.9 MG (7.44-19.8, 8); Sweet potatoes, orange flesh, without skin, raw: 14.84 MG (13.0-17.5, 8)
    USDA FoodData Central, Foundation Foods, release 2026-04-30 · checked 2026-10-02
  3. pvs-r3-04 · reference dataset
    Potato, baked, NFS (fdc_id 2709383): Energy 93 KCAL per 100 g; 1 medium 285 g 265.1 KCAL; Sweet potato, NFS (fdc_id 2709697): Energy 115 KCAL per 100 g; 1 medium 150 g 172.5 KCAL
    USDA FNDDS, FoodData Central survey foods, fdc_id 2709383 and 2709697 · checked 2026-10-02
  4. pvs-r3-05 · RCT
    Geometric mean (95% CI) fractional iron absorption (FIA) was 5.82% (3.79%, 8.95%) and 6.02% (4.51%, 8.05%), respectively (P = 0.81), resulting in 1.9-fold higher total iron absorption (TIA) from biofortified sweetpotato (P < 0.001). The regular and biofortified potato test meals contained 0.33 and 0.69 mg Fe/100 g. FIA was 28.4% (23.5%, 34.2%) from the regular yellow-fleshed and 13.3% (10.6%, 16.6%) from the biofortified purple-fleshed potato meals
    J Nutr, 2020 · checked 2026-10-02
  5. pvs-r3-06 · RCT
    Geometric mean (95% CI) fractional iron absorption from the iron-biofortified clone and the nonbiofortified variety were 12.1% (10.3%-14.2%) and 16.6% (14.0%-19.6%), respectively (P < 0.001). Total iron absorption from the iron-biofortified clone and the nonbiofortified variety were 0.35 mg (0.30-0.41 mg) and 0.24 mg (0.20-0.28 mg) per 460 g meal, respectively (P < 0.001).
    J Nutr, 2023 · checked 2026-10-02
  6. pvs-r3-07 · RCT
    Mean fractional zinc absorption (FZA) from the biofortified potatoes was lower than from the regular potatoes, 20.8% (SD: 5.4%) and 25.5% (SD: 7.0%), respectively (P < 0.01). However, total zinc absorbed was significantly higher (0.49; SD: 0.13 and 0.40; SD: 0.11 mg/500 g, P < 0.01, respectively).
    J Nutr, 2023 · checked 2026-10-02
  7. pvs-r3-08 · cohort
    For every increment of three servings weekly of total potato, the rate for T2D increased by 5% (hazard ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02 to 1.08) and for every increment of three servings weekly of French fries the rate increased by 20% (1.20, 1.12 to 1.28). Intake of combined baked, boiled, or mashed potatoes was not significantly associated with T2D risk (pooled hazard ratio 1.01, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.05).
    BMJ, 2025 · checked 2026-10-02
  8. pvs-r3-10 · cohort meta-analysis
    while fried potato consumption was not associated with CVD risk, there was a 10% higher risk of HTN (95% CI: 4% to 17%) comparing 1+ servings/week to no fried potato intake.
    Nutrients, 2025 · checked 2026-10-02
  9. pvs-r3-09 · meta-analysis
    fried potato intake was not associated with overweight/obesity (1.24; 95% CI: 0.90, 1.70) or GDM (1.03; 95% CI: 0.97, 1.09) but was significantly associated with increased diabetes risk (1.16; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.30)
    Nutr Rev, 2025 · checked 2026-10-02
  10. pvs-r3-12 · cohort
    A higher risk of UC was observed with high intakes of potatoes (fourth vs first quartile aHR 1.51; 95% CI: 1.05-2.17).
    Am J Gastroenterol, 2026 · checked 2026-10-02
  11. pvs-r3-14 · scoping review
    Current available evidence indicates that moderate consumption of potatoes is not associated with a substantial risk of chronic diseases, and that they may be part of a healthy diet. However, the health effects vary greatly depending on cooking methods, and studies indicate that the intake of French fries/fried potatoes should be limited.
    Food Nutr Res, 2024 · checked 2026-10-02
  12. pvs-r3-15 · registry entry
    POL-HC-8425 Slendesta® Potato Extract Slendesta® contributes to the reduction of body weight in overweight individuals -/- Non-authorised
    EU Register on nutrition and health claims, claim POL-HC-8425, snapshot 2026-09-21 · checked 2026-10-02
  13. pvs-r3-16 · registry entry
    POL-HC-7796 Potato protein isolate Increases the sense of satiety Elicit satiety Reduces appetite Supports weight control Non-authorised
    EU Register on nutrition and health claims, claim POL-HC-7796, snapshot 2026-09-21 · checked 2026-10-02
  14. pvs-r3-11 · meta-analysis
    In the dose-response meta-analysis, a significantly increased GDM risk was revealed for each daily serving (80 g) intakes of total potato (RR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.42; P for trend = 0.007) and unfried potato (RR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.07, 1.48; P for trend = 0.006).
    Clin Nutr, 2021 · checked 2026-10-02
  15. pvs-r3-13 · systematic review
    Orange-fleshed sweet potatoes are widely accepted by Mozambican farmers and consumers, and various studies show a positive impact on vitamin A status due to the introduction of this nutritionally superior staple crop.
    Food Nutr Bull, 2015 · checked 2026-10-02
  16. pvs-r3-03 · reference dataset
    USDA-RETN-R6:3301 POTATOES,BAKED IN SKIN - vitamin_c_mg 80% - thiamin_mg 85% - folate_total_ug 90% - vitamin_b6_mg 95% - potassium_mg 100%
    USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007), code 3301 · checked 2026-10-02

Review. Reviewed on 2026-10-02 for evidence level, dose and population context, and claims a reader could misread. Bioma Learn has no human medical reviewer at this time, and we say so rather than invent one. Methodology. This is information, not medical advice.