BiomaLearnFoodsNutrition factsNutrientsGuidesAnswersEvidence

Pork belly: how much fat, and what the red meat studies say

In a randomized trial in 16 active adults, a post-exercise meal of high-fat pork with 20 g protein and 20.6 g fat produced about a third less muscle protein synthesis than the same protein from lean pork, measured over a single five-hour window. That is as close as the research gets to pork belly. The only study we found that names the cut is a Korean market survey, where fat level judged by eye explained what distributors preferred. The fat itself varies a lot. UK tables put raw belly, lean and fat, at 258 calories and 20.2 g fat per 3.5 oz (100 g). Six US samples sold with the skin on ran from about 31 to 42 g fat, and the two records differ by 44 percent because the cut and the trim differ. The health findings below come from pork in general or from red meat as a whole.

Every statement here is tied to a source. The badge says what kind of evidence stands behind it: A is a meta-analysis or systematic review, E is the position of an expert body without its own analysis. How we verify →

The numbers, per 3.5 oz (100 g)

USDA entrykcalProteinFatCarbsFiber
Pork, belly, with skin, raw38515.2 g35.8 g-0.7 g— g
Pork, fresh, belly, raw5189.34 g53 g0 g0 g

These are the USDA entries that are pork belly, not foods made from it; they differ in cut, part, pack or preparation. Linked names have a page with the full profile and per-portion figures.

As people eat it, per 3.5 oz (100 g)

As eatenkcalProteinFatCarbsFiber
Pork, belly40426.6 g32.2 g0 g0 g

USDA Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies (FNDDS, release 2024-10-31): pork belly as it is prepared and served, from the recipes behind the national dietary survey, rather than a single laboratory sample.

How much is actually in it

What a real portion looks like

What your body absorbs

What cooking and storage change

What it does to your health

Safety, limits and interactions

Who this works differently for

What is still unknown

The bottom line

Grilling concentrates what is there. In UK tables water falls from 61.7 g to 48.6 g per 3.5 oz (100 g), so grilled belly reads 23.4 g fat and 320 calories, with the caveat that raw and grilled figures come from different samples. A US survey slice weighs 1.1 oz (30 g) and an unspecified serving 2.1 oz (60 g). The USDA retention factor for broiled fresh pork keeps about 65 percent of vitamin B6 and 70 percent of thiamin, and all of the zinc and riboflavin. That is a group figure from a 1975 table, never measured on belly. A meta-analysis of 10 intervention studies in 397 adults found that eating more red meat raised hemoglobin by 2.36 g/L (95% CI 0.71 to 4.02). Ferritin, the measure of iron stores, did not change significantly. Not every included study was randomized, and none tested belly. Pork from pigs kept under UVB light lifted blood vitamin D3 by at most 0.9 nmol/L over 24 hours in a crossover trial in 14 adults, against 1.5 nmol/L for a supplement. That pork was specially produced, and ordinary pork managed 0.7 nmol/L. Observational data from 19 cohorts with 4.29 million people link the highest total red meat intake to a 12 percent higher risk of pancreatic cancer (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.24). This is an association. Pork was not analyzed on its own, and neither processed nor unprocessed red meat reached significance separately. Who should be careful. People with alpha-gal syndrome react to red meat, pork included. In a meta-analysis of 1162 patients from 15 observational series, 91.8 percent had symptoms start an hour or more after eating, though the studies differed widely. Raw pork can carry Salmonella. A risk model for China estimated it in 8.1 percent of live pigs and found that less cross-contamination in home kitchens lowered the risk, a result nobody has checked for other countries. USDA FSIS advises cooking raw pork steaks, chops and roasts to at least 145 °F (63 °C) and letting the meat rest for at least three minutes before carving or eating. We have no card on pregnancy, children or medicines for pork belly.

Pork belly compared

Related foods

More from the same food group (pork products)

Sources

  1. pbl-r6-01 · food composition dataset
    CoFID 18-557 Pork, belly joint/slices, raw, lean and fat (group MAG): Energy 258 kcal; Fat 20.2 g; Satd FA 7.25 g; Protein 19.1 g; Water 61.7 g
    CoFID 2021 (Public Health England), code 18-557 Pork, belly joint/slices, raw, lean and fat · checked 2026-09-29
  2. pbl-r6-02 · food composition dataset
    Pork, belly, with skin, raw (FDC 2727576, foundation, Pork Products): fat 35.83 g per 100 g, Foundation samples 30.61-41.87 n=6; protein 15.2 g, samples 12.844-16.081; cholesterol 66.62 mg, samples 60.1-77.6 n=6
    USDA FoodData Central Foundation Foods, FDC 2727576 Pork, belly, with skin, raw · checked 2026-09-29
  3. pbl-r6-05 · portion dataset
    Pork, belly | FNDDS 22708020 | fdc_id 2705901 | 1 slice, any size 30 g | 1 oz yields 20 g | 1 cubic inch 17 g | 1 cup 135 g | Quantity not specified 60 g
    USDA FNDDS, Pork, belly, food code 22708020 (fdc_id 2705901) · checked 2026-09-29
  4. pbl-r6-06 · randomized controlled trial
    Following exercise, participants ingested either HFP (266 kcal, 20 g protein, 20.6 g fat), LFP (120 kcal, 20 g protein, 4.4 g fat), or CHO (266 kcal, 0 g protein, 0 g fat, 73.3 g carbohydrate). ... with LFP eliciting a greater postexercise MPS {0.106 ± 0.026 %/h [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.088, 0.118]} than HFP [0.072 ± 0.027 %/h (95% CI: 0.057, 0.087); P = 0.030]
    Am J Clin Nutr, 2025 · checked 2026-09-29
  5. pbl-r6-08 · randomized crossover trial
    UV pork and supplement significantly increased within-group serum 25(OH)D3 concentrations over timepoints (p < 0.05) (max. change 0.9 nmol/L (2.2%) UV pork, 1.5 nmol/L (3.5%) supplement, 0.7 nmol/L (1.9%) control).
    Int J Food Sci Nutr, 2023 · checked 2026-09-29
  6. pbl-r6-03 · food composition dataset
    CoFID 18-557 raw: Energy 258 kcal; Fat 20.2 g; Water 61.7 g || CoFID 18-555 roasted: Energy 293 kcal; Fat 21.4 g; Water 55.8 g || CoFID 18-556 grilled: Energy 320 kcal; Fat 23.4 g; Water 48.6 g
    CoFID 2021 (Public Health England), codes 18-557, 18-555, 18-556 · checked 2026-09-29
  7. pbl-r6-04 · retention dataset
    USDA-RETN-R6:1251 PORK,FRESH,BROILED | Pork Products (10) | vitamin_b6_mg 65% | thiamin_mg 70% | iron_mg 80% | niacin_mg 80% | vitamin_b12_ug 90% | zinc_mg 100% | riboflavin_mg 100%
    USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007), Retn_Code 1251 PORK,FRESH,BROILED · checked 2026-09-29
  8. pbl-r6-10 · meta-analysis and risk model
    The model estimated an overall Salmonella prevalence of 8.1% (95% CI: 5.43-11.91%) in live pigs and 13.29% (95% CI: 9.19-18.69%) in pig feces. ... Optimization of interventions at critical control points, such as using disinfectants during washing and reducing cross-contamination in household kitchens, can effectively reduce the risk of Salmonella contamination.
    Food Res Int, 2026 · checked 2026-09-29
  9. pbl-r6-11 · meta-analysis of cohorts
    19 studies involving 4,291,065 participants with 13,820 pancreatic cancer cases were included. The highest intake of total red meat was positively related to risk of pancreatic cancer (Pooled HR: 1.12, 95%CIs: 1.01, 1.24; I2: 36.5 %, PQ-test: 0.10). Such association was not significant for unprocessed (Pooled HR: 1.05, 95%CIs: 0.88, 1.24; I2: 66.6 %, PQ-test: 0.002) and processed (Pooled HR: 1.02, 95%CIs: 0.86, 1.21; I2: 66.0 %, PQ-test: 0.001) red meat intake.
    Clin Nutr ESPEN, 2025 · checked 2026-09-29
  10. sf-fsis5-7 · agency advice
    Cook all raw beef, pork, lamb, and veal steaks, chops, and roasts to a minimum internal temperature of 145 °F...For safety and quality, allow meat to rest for at least three minutes before carving or consuming.
    USDA FSIS, Doneness Versus Safety · checked 2026-10-08
  11. pbl-r6-07 · meta-analysis of intervention studies
    Interventions involving increasing red meat intake had no significant effect on serum ferritin concentrations (raw mean change difference [RMCD] = 1.87 μg L-1; 95% CI, -0.73 to 4.48; t = 1.619; P = .139) but did have a positive effect on Hb concentrations (RMCD = 2.36 g L-1; 95% CI, 0.71 to 4.02; t = 3.297; P = .011).
    Nutr Rev, 2025 · checked 2026-09-29
  12. pbl-r6-09 · meta-analysis
    Tick bite history was recalled by 78.7% (CI: 46.4-98.1; I2 = 99.1%), and 91.8% (CI: 84.6-96.8; I2 = 70.3%) had symptom onset ≥ 1 h post red meat intake.
    Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2026 · checked 2026-09-29
  13. pbl-r6-12 · cross-sectional study
    The regression equations between appearance-based belly fat level and distributors' pork belly preferences demonstrated that all regression equations exhibited an R2 value of 0.75 or higher, indicating that appearance-based belly fat level can effectively explain distributors' pork belly preferences.
    Meat Sci, 2025 · checked 2026-09-29

Review. Reviewed on 2026-10-08 for evidence level, dose and population context, and claims a reader could misread. Bioma Learn has no human medical reviewer at this time, and we say so rather than invent one. Methodology. This is information, not medical advice.