BiomaLearnFoodsNutrientsGuidesAnswersEvidence

Monster energy drink: the trials tested energy drinks as a class

No study in our sources tested this brand. What has been tested is energy drinks as a class, and the pooled result is moderate. Across 34 studies published between 1998 and 2015, drinking a caffeinated energy drink before exercise improved muscle strength and endurance by a standardised effect of 0.49 and endurance tests by 0.53, pooled across many different drinks, doses and tests. Sprinting did not improve, at 0.14 with p = 0.06. A standardised effect near 0.5 is a moderate shift in a score on a test, measured in people doing exercise trials rather than in anyone getting through a working day. EFSA puts the caffeine intake that raises no safety concern for healthy adults at up to 400 mg a day spread through the day, and at up to 200 mg in a single dose, counting every source in the day together and excluding pregnancy. The single USDA record on this page is the low carb version rather than the sugared one, and no card here gives the caffeine or the sugar in one can, so nothing on this page lets us hold a can against that 200 mg, or against the 150 mg that the EFSA level works out to for a 50 kg teenager.

Every statement here is tied to a source. The badge says what kind of evidence stands behind it: A is a meta-analysis or systematic review, E is the position of an expert body without its own analysis. How we verify →

The numbers, per 100 g

USDA entrykcalProteinCarbsFiber
Beverages, MONSTER energy drink, low carb50 g1.38 g0 g

These are the USDA entries that are monster energy drink, not foods made from it. Follow a name for the full profile and per-portion figures.

What your body absorbs

What it does to your health

Safety, limits and interactions

What people believe that the data does not support

Who this works differently for

What is still unknown

The bottom line

The usual story about these drinks is that the caffeine does the work. In the meta-regression inside that same 34-study analysis, performance tracked the taurine dose of the drink at a slope of 0.0001, p = 0.04, and did not track the caffeine dose, slope 0.0009, p = 0.21. That is a comparison across studies rather than a test inside one, so it cannot show which ingredient caused the gain. It is still the opposite of how the can is usually explained. Regulators were not persuaded by either ingredient. In the EU register caffeine carries 11 rejected claims and no authorised one, including the claim that it enhances physical performance and delays the onset of fatigue. The taurine claim about supporting proper metabolism was assessed and not authorised either. Non-authorised means the wording failed the assessment. It is not a finding that the effect is absent. Taurine has also been trialled on its own, away from any drink. Across 34 randomised trials in adults, 1.5 to 3.0 g a day lowered fasting blood glucose by 5.90 mg/dL, 95 percent confidence interval 9.65 to 2.15 lower. Systolic blood pressure fell by 4.38 mmHg, interval 7.26 to 1.50 lower. Those trials gave taurine as a supplement to people with cardiometabolic risk, and none of them handed anyone a sugared caffeinated drink, so the result stays with the supplement. Caffeine also behaves differently by form and by genotype. A systematic review of 32 exercise studies reports that 100 to 300 mg chewed as gum is absorbed rapidly and positively affected most of the performance measures those studies used. That review pooled no effect size and set no form against another, and the speed of absorption is its own framing rather than something it measured. In 12 studies covering 666 people split by CYP1A2 genotype, caffeine improved cycling time trials only in carriers of the A allele, by a weighted mean difference of -0.90, 95 percent confidence interval -1.48 to -0.33. In C allele carriers the difference was -0.08, interval -0.32 to 0.17, which is nothing. Wingate and jump tests showed no benefit in either genotype, and that caffeine came as a measured dose rather than in a can. The caution is about dose and about who is drinking. In pregnancy the EFSA level is 200 mg of caffeine a day from all sources, and for children and adolescents it is 3 mg per kilogram of body weight a day, which for a 50 kg teenager is 150 mg. A 37-year-old man was hospitalised with a serum potassium of 2.0 mmol/l, muscle breakdown, leg paralysis and ECG changes after drinking more than three cans a day, which the report put at 480 mg of caffeine or more. That is one case, so it shows what can happen at that intake and not how often it happens. Across 46 studies of young people, mostly aged 11 to 18 in North America and Europe, energy drink use went together with higher odds of headaches, stomach aches, hyperactivity and insomnia, with some sign of a dose-response. Those studies are mostly cross-sectional, so the drinks may mark a pattern of behaviour rather than cause the symptoms. The review that gathered them asked for work on the short-term and long-term effects in young people, and ten years later no trial has followed young drinkers over time. No card here gives the caffeine, sugar or taurine in one can of this product, so every number above describes something other than the drink in your hand.

Sources

  1. mned-r4-05 · systematic review
    In conclusion, a low dose of caffeine (100-300 mg or 2-4 mg/kg) in the form of chewing gum is rapidly absorbed and utilized, positively impacting most exercise and physiological performance.
    Nutrients, 2024 · checked 2026-09-24
  2. mned-r4-01 · systematic review and meta-analysis
    Overall, ED ingestion improved physical performance in muscle strength and endurance (ES = 0.49; p < 0.001), endurance exercise tests (ES = 0.53; p < 0.001), jumping (ES = 0.29; p = 0.01) and sport-specific actions (ES = 0.51; p < 0.001), but not in sprinting (ES = 0.14; p = 0.06).
    Eur J Nutr, 2017 · checked 2026-09-24
  3. mned-r4-03 · systematic review and meta-analysis
    For physical performance, caffeine showed a small favorable effect (g = 0.32, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.42), with statistical evidence for repeated sprint ability (g = 0.43), agility or change in direction (g = 0.42), sprint or speed performance (g = 0.39), anaerobic power (g = 0.30), and jumping performance (g = 0.29).
    Nutrients, 2026 · checked 2026-09-24
  4. mned-r4-04 · systematic review and meta-analysis
    Taurine supplementation resulted in significant reductions in fasting blood glucose (MD, -5.90 mg/dL; 95% CI, -9.65 to -2.15)...Subgroup and dose-response analyses indicated that a daily taurine dose of 1.5-3.0 g was more effective in improving these cardiometabolic risk factors.
    Nutr Rev, 2026 · checked 2026-09-24
  5. mned-r4-07 · agency risk assessment
    Intakes up to 400mg per day (about 5.7mg/kg bw per day) consumed throughout the day do not raise safety concerns for healthy adults in the general population, except pregnant women.
    European Food Safety Authority, Caffeine topic page, Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine, EFSA Journal 2015;13(5):4102 · checked 2026-09-24
  6. mned-r4-09 · case report
    A 37-year-old man developed severe hypokalemia and rhabdomyolysis after daily intake of over three cans of energy drink (≥ 480 mg caffeine).
    Ugeskr Laeger, 2026 · checked 2026-09-24
  7. mned-r4-02 · meta-regression
    The meta-regression demonstrated a significant association between taurine dosage (mg) and performance (slope = 0.0001; p = 0.04), but not between caffeine dosage (mg) and performance (slope = 0.0009; p = 0.21).
    Eur J Nutr, 2017 · checked 2026-09-24
  8. mned-r4-11 · claims register
    POL-HC-6841 Caffeine -Enhances physical performance. -Provides a performance edge -Can delay the onset of fatigue -Can increase exercise intensity/work rate Non-authorised
    EU Register on nutrition and health claims, claim POL-HC-6841, snapshot 2026-09-21 · checked 2026-09-24
  9. mned-r4-12 · claims register
    POL-HC-8026 Taurine It supports proper metabolism (uptake of glucose/caffeine). Non-authorised
    EU Register on nutrition and health claims, claim POL-HC-8026, snapshot 2026-09-21 · checked 2026-09-24
  10. mned-r4-06 · systematic review and meta-analysis
    In subgroup analyses, acute caffeine intake improved cycling time trial only in individuals with the A allele (WMD = -0.90, 95%CI: -1.48 to -0.33, p = 0.002), but not the C allele (WMD = -0.08, 95%CI: -0.32 to 0.17, p = 0.53).
    J Sport Health Sci, 2024 · checked 2026-09-24
  11. mned-r4-08 · agency risk assessment
    Caffeine intakes from all sources up to 200mg per day consumed throughout the day do not raise safety concerns for the foetus....A safety level of 3mg/kg bw per day is also proposed for habitual caffeine consumption by children and adolescents.
    European Food Safety Authority, Caffeine topic page, Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine, EFSA Journal 2015;13(5):4102 · checked 2026-09-24
  12. mned-r4-10 · rapid evidence assessment
    Several studies identified a strong, positive association between the use of energy drinks and higher odds of health-damaging behaviours, as well as physical health symptoms such as headaches, stomach aches, hyperactivity and insomnia.
    BMJ Open, 2016 · checked 2026-09-24
  13. mned-r4-13 · rapid evidence assessment
    More research is needed to explore the short-term and long-term impacts in all spheres, including health, behaviour and education.
    BMJ Open, 2016 · checked 2026-09-24

Review. Reviewed on 2026-09-24 for evidence level, dose and population context, and claims a reader could misread. Bioma Learn has no human medical reviewer at this time, and we say so rather than invent one. Methodology. This is information, not medical advice.