BiomaLearnFoodsNutrientsGuidesAnswersEvidence

Mixed nuts: 105 trials, no weight gain, and one number to watch

Across 105 randomised trials searched to December 2020, diets enriched with nuts did not raise body weight in 6768 adults. The same pooling found no increase in body mass index in 2918 people, in waist circumference in 5045 or in body fat in 1226, with hazelnut-enriched diets the single exception for waist circumference. The energy side has been pooled too, and it is small. Resting energy expenditure rose by 28.6 kcal a day across 1121 adults from 27 studies, and the confidence interval runs from minus 10.7 to plus 67.8, so zero sits inside it. In people who already have atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, adding nuts moves the standard markers barely at all. Across 5 randomised trials of 6 to 12 weeks in 436 such adults, at a median dose of 30 g a day, systolic blood pressure differed by 1.16 mmHg with a confidence interval from minus 5.68 to plus 3.35, which crosses zero. The number the title points at is selenium. A cup of unroasted mixed nuts weighs 142 g in the US survey record and carries 208.9 mcg of it, against an adult tolerable upper intake level of 400 mcg a day that falls to 45 mcg for the youngest children, and Brazil nuts at 68 to 91 mcg each are what tips a tin towards it.

Every statement here is tied to a source. The badge says what kind of evidence stands behind it: A is a meta-analysis or systematic review, E is the position of an expert body without its own analysis. How we verify →

The numbers, per 100 g

USDA entrykcalProteinCarbsFiber
Mixed nuts, dry roasted, with peanuts59417.3 g25.4 g9 g
Mixed nuts, oil roasted, with peanuts, lightly salted60720 g21.1 g7 g
Mixed nuts, oil roasted, with peanuts60720 g21.1 g7 g
Mixed nuts, oil roasted, without peanuts61515.5 g22.3 g5.5 g
Nuts, mixed nuts, dry roasted, with peanuts, salt added, CHOSEN ROASTER60818 g24.6 g7.1 g
Nuts, mixed nuts, dry roasted, with peanuts, salt added, PLANTERS pistachio blend57223.3 g23.1 g8.1 g
Nuts, mixed nuts, dry roasted, with peanuts, without salt added60719.5 g22.4 g6.4 g
Nuts, mixed nuts, oil roasted, with peanuts, without salt added60720 g21.1 g7 g
Nuts, mixed nuts, oil roasted, without peanuts, lightly salted60717.9 g25 g7.1 g
Nuts, mixed nuts, oil roasted, without peanuts, without salt added61515.5 g22.3 g5.5 g

These are the USDA entries that are mixed nuts, not foods made from it. Follow a name for the full profile and per-portion figures.

How much is actually in it

What cooking and storage change

What it does to your health

Safety, limits and interactions

Who this works differently for

What is still unknown

The bottom line

Selenium is the number to watch in a mixed tin. A cup of unroasted mixed nuts weighs 142 g and carries 208.9 mcg of selenium in the USDA survey record. The adult tolerable upper intake level set by the US Food and Nutrition Board is 400 mcg a day, and it falls to 45 mcg for the youngest children. Brazil nuts are what tips it, at 68 to 91 mcg of selenium each by the National Institutes of Health, which names regular intake of them as a route to selenium toxicity. Those last two are agency documents rather than measurements in people eating mixed nuts. How close any tin comes to that limit depends on how many Brazil nuts are in it: across the 10 USDA records for mixed nuts, selenium runs from 3.7 to 421.5 mcg per 100 g. On nut allergy this page has one small study, and it is about testing rather than about eating. In 19 patients with lipid transfer protein syndrome, median age 32.5 years, a supervised challenge with 2 to 4 nuts at once was negative in every case and cut testing time from 208 to 76 hours across 52 individual nuts. That is a hospital procedure. The association data is larger than the trial data and says something weaker. Each extra 28 g of nuts a week went with 10 percent lower cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.86 to 0.94) across 63 prospective cohort studies. All-cause mortality in the same pooling came out 8 percent lower (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.90 to 0.94). Those are observational cohorts, so the figure is an association. The trials that actually added nuts found less. In 388 adults over 40 who were 2 to 6 months past a heart attack, 10 g each of peanuts, cashew and Brazil nuts daily for 16 weeks left LDL cholesterol 3.48 mg/dL from control (95% CI minus 3.45 to 10.41, P = 0.32). In 439 adults with atherosclerotic disease across 5 trials, the only lipid marker that moved was the atherogenic index, by 0.32 units (95% CI minus 0.58 to minus 0.06). One group did better than that. In 28 healthy adults aged 65 plus or minus 3 years with a BMI of 27.9, a crossover gave 60 g a day of walnuts, pistachio, cashew and hazelnuts for 16 weeks. LDL cholesterol fell by 0.24 mmol/L (95% CI minus 0.44 to minus 0.04) and systolic blood pressure by 5 mmHg (95% CI minus 8 to minus 1). Roasting costs about 20 percent of the folate, vitamin C and phosphorus and about 15 percent of the thiamin by the USDA retention factors for nut and seed products, while iron, zinc, magnesium, potassium and copper are listed at full retention. Gut health is the open question. A 2025 review of 28 intervention trials, six of them using a mixture of nuts, found no effect on fecal pH or intestinal permeability, a favourable move in propionate and an unfavourable move in fecal moisture.

Sources

  1. mxnt-r5-15 · dataset
    Mixed nuts, unroasted [fdc_id 2707505]: Selenium, Se 147.1 UG per 100 g; 1 cup 142 g = 208.9 UG; 1 package 50 g = 73.5 UG; Quantity not specified 28 g = 41.2 UG
    USDA FNDDS, Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies, fdc_id 2707505 · checked 2026-09-24
  2. mxnt-r5-14 · dataset
    NUTS,ROASTED / Retn_Code 2203 / Nut and Seed Products: folate_total_ug 80%, vitamin_c_mg 80%, phosphorus_mg 80%, thiamin_mg 85%, riboflavin_mg 95%, niacin_mg 95%, vitamin_b6_mg 95%, sodium_mg 95%, calcium_mg 100%, iron_mg 100%, magnesium_mg 100%, potassium_mg 100%, zinc_mg 100%, copper_mg 100%
    USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6, 2007, retention code 2203 · checked 2026-09-24
  3. mxnt-r5-01 · meta-analysis of cohorts
    With per 28-g increases in weekly nut intake, the RRs (95% CIs) for CHD, stroke, CVD, CVD mortality and all-cause mortality were 0.96 (0.95-0.97), 0.99 (0.97-1.01), 0.98 (0.97-0.99), 0.90 (0.86-0.94) and 0.92 (0.90-0.94), respectively.
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis, 2026 · checked 2026-09-24
  4. mxnt-r5-02 · meta-analysis of RCTs
    They also had no effect on systolic (mean difference [MD]: -1.16 mmHg [95% CI, -5.68 to 3.35], I2 = 0%-moderate certainty of evidence) or diastolic (MD: 0.10 mmHg [95% CI, -2.30 to 2.51], I2 = 0%-high certainty of evidence) blood pressure.
    Nutr Rev, 2025 · checked 2026-09-24
  5. mxnt-r5-03 · meta-analysis of RCTs
    Compared to nut-free diets, nut intake did not have a statistically significant effect on lipid profile biomarkers, except on the atherogenic index (MD: -0.32 [95% CI -0.58 to -0.06], I2 = 0% - moderate certainty of the evidence).
    Eur J Nutr, 2024 · checked 2026-09-24
  6. mxnt-r5-04 · meta-analysis of RCTs
    The meta-analyses identified a nonsignificant increase in REE associated with nut consumption (weighted mean difference: 28.6 kcal/d; 95% CI: -10.7, 67.8 kcal/d).
    Adv Nutr, 2023 · checked 2026-09-24
  7. mxnt-r5-05 · network meta-analysis of RCTs
    In the comparisons of nut consumption versus a control diet, there was no significant increase observed in any of the adiposity-related measures examined except for hazelnut-enriched diets, which raised WC.
    Nutrients, 2021 · checked 2026-09-24
  8. mxnt-r5-07 · randomised controlled trial
    no significant difference was found between the groups in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations (intervention-control difference: 3.48 mg/dL [-3.45 to 10.41], P = 0.32)
    Nutr J, 2024 · checked 2026-09-24
  9. mxnt-r5-08 · randomised controlled trial
    In the postprandial period, fat oxidation was higher in the MNG than in the CTG (piAUC: 47.53 ± 5.78 mg/min vs. 27.93 ± 6.98 mg/min; p = 0.048).
    Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis, 2026 · checked 2026-09-24
  10. mxnt-r5-10 · meta-analysis of RCTs
    Evidence indicates no significant difference in serum lipid profile and DBP between the MED diet supplemented with olive oil and that with mixed nuts in participants at risk of CVD. However, mixed nuts significantly reduce SBP compared to olive oil.
    Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis, 2025 · checked 2026-09-24
  11. mxnt-r5-11 · agency fact sheet
    The Tolerable Upper Intake Level for selenium is 400 mcg for adults, and it ranges from 45 mcg to 400 mcg for infants, children, and adolescents, depending on age.
    NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, Selenium Fact Sheet for Health Professionals · checked 2026-09-24
  12. mxnt-r5-12 · agency fact sheet
    As discussed earlier, Brazil nuts contain very high amounts of selenium (68–91 mcg per nut) and could cause selenium toxicity if consumed regularly.
    NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, Selenium Fact Sheet for Health Professionals · checked 2026-09-24
  13. mxnt-r5-06 · randomised crossover trial
    Intrahepatic lipid content (-0.7%-point; 95% CI: -1.3%-point to -0.1%-point; P = 0.027), serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration (-0.24 mmol/L; 95% CI: -0.44 to -0.04 mmol/L; P = 0.019), and systolic blood pressure (-5 mm Hg; 95% CI: -8 to -1 mm Hg; P = 0.006) were lower after the mixed nut intervention.
    Am J Clin Nutr, 2024 · checked 2026-09-24
  14. mxnt-r5-13 · observational challenge study
    Nineteen patients (73.7% male; median age 32.5 years) underwent MixNut, testing 52 individual nuts. All challenges were negative. The MixNut approach reduced the number of OFC by 63% (from 52 to 19) and total testing time from 208 to 76 h.
    Nutrients, 2025 · checked 2026-09-24
  15. mxnt-r5-09 · meta-analysis of RCTs
    In summary, the available evidence indicates that nuts have modest effect on gut health, but the substantial heterogeneity between studies may hinder further conclusions.
    Adv Nutr, 2025 · checked 2026-09-24

Review. Reviewed on 2026-09-24 for evidence level, dose and population context, and claims a reader could misread. Bioma Learn has no human medical reviewer at this time, and we say so rather than invent one. Methodology. This is information, not medical advice.