BiomaLearnFoodsNutrientsGuidesAnswersEvidence

Mackerel: one word, two fish, and a mercury line between them

Herring and mackerel lunches three times a week for sixteen weeks raised red blood cell EPA by 0.61 standard deviations (95% CI 0.36 to 0.86) in a trial of 232 Norwegian children aged 4 to 6. That number comes from an exploratory panel of 86 biomarkers, and it is a standardised shift rather than a concentration. The same panel put hair mercury up by 0.83 standard deviations, on a confidence interval of 0.05 to 1.05 that nearly touches zero, and the trial recorded no clinical outcome from that rise. What the trial was built to measure did not move at all. Cognitive scores rose 17.7 points on the WPPSI-III with fish (95% CI 14.8 to 20.7) against 17.8 with meat (95% CI 15.0 to 20.6), p = 0.97. In 170 of the same children those lunches changed neither mental health nor sleep scores against meat, and both were secondary outcomes the study was not powered for. Before any of this reaches your kitchen there is a naming problem. The FDA and EPA chart lists King mackerel under Choices to Avoid, the group named for the highest mercury levels, and puts Atlantic mackerel and Pacific chub mackerel under Best Choices. Two fish sold under one word sit at opposite ends of the same page.

Every statement here is tied to a source. The badge says what kind of evidence stands behind it: A is a meta-analysis or systematic review, E is the position of an expert body without its own analysis. How we verify →

The numbers, per 100 g

USDA entrykcalProteinCarbsFiber
Mackerel, Atlantic, cooked26223.9 g0 g0 g
Mackerel, Atlantic, raw20518.6 g0 g0 g
Mackerel, Pacific and jack, mixed species, cooked20125.7 g0 g0 g
Mackerel, Pacific and jack, mixed species, raw15820.1 g0 g0 g
Mackerel, jack, canned, drained solids15623.2 g0 g0 g
Mackerel, salted30518.5 g0 g0 g
Mackerel, spanish, raw13919.3 g0 g0 g
Fish, mackerel, king, cooked, dry heat13426 g0 g0 g
Fish, mackerel, king, raw10520.3 g0 g0 g
Fish, mackerel, spanish, cooked, dry heat15823.6 g0 g0 g

These are the USDA entries that are mackerel, not foods made from it. Follow a name for the full profile and per-portion figures.

How much is actually in it

What a real portion looks like

What cooking and storage change

What it does to your health

Safety, limits and interactions

What people believe that the data does not support

Who this works differently for

What is still unknown

The bottom line

Mackerel is not the vitamin D fish. The composition tables behind a survey of 3 257 Polish male adolescents grouped it at 1.05 to 4 micrograms per 100 g against 7 to 15 micrograms for salmon, rainbow trout, herring and eel. Those are table values rather than a fresh assay, in a food where species and season move vitamin D a great deal. Most people are nowhere near the advice anyway. UK women aged 20 to 39 averaged 33 g of oily fish a week between 2008 and 2021, which is 24 percent of the 140 g the NHS recommends, from four-day diaries that understate intake the way recall usually does. The health claims are softer than the reputation. In 20 670 Korean adults followed for 5 years, the top fifth of oily fish intake went with a 25 percent lower risk of high triglycerides in men (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.95) and 0.81 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.96) in women. Intake there came from a food frequency questionnaire, the exposure was oily fish as a group with mackerel one of several, and observational data cannot show that eating more would change anything. In a non-randomised 1990 crossover with no confidence intervals reported, three cans of mackerel a week for eight months went with lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure in 12 men with mild essential hypertension, and that is the only arm of that study whose blood pressure result the abstract gives. In 18 adults with chronic plaque psoriasis, a randomised crossover swapped white fish for 170 g of oily fish a day for 6 weeks and improved severity by 11 and 15 percent (P < 0.01). Mackerel was named among the fish recommended there rather than tested on its own. Two cautions here are real. Histamine builds up in fish kept warm, and in a survey of 38 fish in Lima markets, 75 percent of the mackerel bought after 2 p.m. was above 10 ppm, far below the 500 ppm that paper ties to illness. In a 1991 challenge study whose abstract gives no participant count, blind feeding of deliberately spoiled mackerel under medical supervision brought on nausea, vomiting or diarrhoea after 50 g portions. Volunteers there fell into susceptible and non-susceptible groups instead of reacting in step with the histamine dose. Buy it cold, buy it early, keep it cold. Fish allergy is the second caution. Of 39 adults who reported it, 36 had a positive skin test to at least one of 17 fish extracts, and IgE cross-reactivity ran between mackerel and anchovy, which is sensitisation rather than proven clinical allergy, so tolerating one species says little about the next. For raw mackerel, freezing is the step that kills Anisakis larvae, and it costs nothing at the table. Over 120 blind comparisons, 40 Japanese adults preferred the unfrozen piece with odds of 0.86 (95% CI 0.59 to 1.26, P = 0.45), and that is odds, not risk, from forty medical students in one city with frequent sushi eaters excluded on purpose. Across twelve Mediterranean surveys published 1960 to 2012, anisakid larvae sat in 0.64 percent of fish muscle and 0.95 percent of fish overall, with Atlantic mackerel among the low prevalence species, in Mediterranean catch only. If you are pregnant or breastfeeding, the species on the label decides the answer. The FDA and EPA advise 2 to 3 servings a week from the Best Choices list, where Atlantic mackerel and Pacific chub mackerel sit, while King mackerel is on the avoid list of the same chart. In US survey data from 2011 to 2014, mackerel was one of the fish driving methylmercury intake among Asian Americans, who carried higher blood methylmercury than non-Asian participants, women of reproductive age included, with intake modelled from a 30-day fish recall rather than measured. The same chart is written for parents feeding children as well, and the serving size on it differs by age. The children in the Norwegian trial ate fatty fish three times a week for sixteen weeks, and it was their hair mercury that rose 0.83 standard deviations, with no clinical outcome recorded either way.

Sources

  1. mack-r2-15 · cross-sectional dietary survey
    The highest amounts of vitamin D were provided by salmon, rainbow trout, herring, and eel (fish species containing 7-15 µg of vitamin D in 100 g of product), and halibut, mackerel, brook trout, sole, and tuna (fish species containing 1.05-4 µg of vitamin D in 100 g of product)
    Nutrients, 2025 · checked 2026-09-24
  2. mack-r2-14 · dietary survey analysis, 2026
    Women aged 20-39 years consumed an average of 33 g of oily fish per week in the period 2008-2021. This is only 24% of the NHS recommended intake of 140 g.
    Int J Food Sci Nutr, 2026 · checked 2026-09-24
  3. mack-r2-07 · meta-analysis of prevalence data
    Anisakids prevalence in fish muscle was 0.64% (P < 0.0001), in viscera it was 1.34% (P < 0.0001), and overall prevalence was 0.95% (P < 0.0001)...Anchovy, pilchard, and Atlantic mackerel have a low prevalence and mean intensity of anisakidae larvae in both viscera and muscles.
    Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 2016 · checked 2026-09-24
  4. mack-r2-08 · randomised double-blind sensory trial
    Among 120 rounds of discrimination testing involving the consumption of 240 pieces of mackerel sushi, unfrozen sushi was believed to taste better in 42.5% (51 dishes) of cases, frozen sushi was thought to taste better in 49.2% (59 dishes), and the participants felt the taste was the same in 8.3% (10 dishes).
    Clin Infect Dis, 2015 · checked 2026-09-24
  5. mack-r2-10 · market survey, ELISA measurement
    Histamine levels of > 500 ppm usually are associated with clinical illness...Mackerel purchased at retail markets after 2 p.m. had a 75% prevalence of histamine levels of > 10 ppm.
    J Food Prot, 2009 · checked 2026-09-24
  6. mack-r2-01 · controlled clinical trial, crossover
    In the first 3 studies, 15 normotensive volunteers, 14 patients with mild essential hypertension and 15 patients with hyperlipoproteinemias (HLP, phenotypes IIa, IIb, IV and V), respectively, were put on isocaloric diets supplemented either with 2 cans/day of commercially available mackerel fillet in tomato pulp for 2 weeks...In a fourth (long-term) study providing as low as 3 cans/week of mackerel for 8 months systolic and diastolic BP of 12 male patients with mild essential hypertension appeared significantly reduced at the end of the dietary period.
    Klin Wochenschr, 1990 · checked 2026-09-24
  7. mack-r2-03 · RCT, biomarker substudy
    We found significant effects of the intervention on the following biomarkers: RBC EPA (20:5n-3), 0.61 (95% CI: 0.36, 0.86); DHA (22:6n-3), 0.43 (95% CI: 0.21, 0.66); total n-3 PUFAs, 0.41 (95% CI: 0.20, 0.64)
    J Nutr, 2021 · checked 2026-09-24
  8. mack-r2-06 · randomised crossover trial, 1993
    Then the patients were randomized either to continue with the white fish diet or to substitute 170 g oily fish daily for 6 weeks...The oily fish but not the white fish diet led to a modest clinical improvement (11% and 15%, P < 0.01) which was accompanied by a rise in plasma eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5n-3) concentrations.
    Eur J Clin Nutr, 1993 · checked 2026-09-24
  9. mack-r2-12 · prospective cohort, 5 years
    Oily fish consumption was associated with a significantly lower risk of hypertriglyceridemia in both men (Relative risk (RR) comparing extreme quintiles = 0.75; 95% CI 0.60-0.95; P for trend = 0.0121) and women (RR comparing extreme quintiles = 0.81; 95% CI 0.69-0.96; P for trend = 0.0110) after adjusting for potential confounders.
    Nutrients, 2019 · checked 2026-09-24
  10. mack-r2-09 · human challenge, blinded, non-randomised
    Deliberately spoiled mackerel samples and mackerel samples implicated in outbreaks of scombrotoxicosis were, under medical supervision, tested blind on normal, healthy volunteers of both sexes. These experiments identified batches of fish which could induce nausea/vomiting and/or diarrhoea when 50 g samples were consumed.
    Food Addit Contam, 1991 · checked 2026-09-24
  11. mack-r2-16 · agency advice
    Choices to Avoid HIGHEST MERCURY LEVELS...King mackerel
    US FDA and EPA, Advice about Eating Fish, fish chart · checked 2026-09-24
  12. mack-r2-04 · RCT, biomarker substudy
    hair mercury, 0.83 (95% CI: 0.05, 1.05)
    J Nutr, 2021 · checked 2026-09-24
  13. mack-r2-11 · clinical allergy study, 1996
    Radioallergosorbent inhibition testing demonstrated significant cross-reactivity among pollack, salmon, trout, and tuna; and between mackerel and anchovy.
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 1996 · checked 2026-09-24
  14. mack-r2-13 · NHANES analysis
    Our analysis found both Asian WORA and Asian adults age ≥ 50 years old had significantly higher BMeHg levels and ADMI than their Non-Asian counterparts...Key fish species that influenced the dietary MeHg intake for Asians were mackerel, tuna
    Environ Res, 2018 · checked 2026-09-24
  15. mack-r2-17 · agency advice
    Eat 2 to 3 servings a week from the 'Best Choices' list (OR 1 serving from the 'Good Choices' list).
    US FDA and EPA, Advice about Eating Fish, fish chart · checked 2026-09-24
  16. mack-r2-02 · RCT, two arms, 16 weeks
    The intervention had no effect on the WPPSI-III scores (mean change total raw score; fish group 17.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 14.8-20.7 vs meat group 17.8, 95% CI 15.0-20.6, p = 0.97) in the main analyses.
    BMC Med, 2018 · checked 2026-09-24
  17. mack-r2-05 · RCT, two arms, 16 weeks
    There was no significant statistical difference between changes in mental health and sleep for the fish eating group compared with the meat eating group, neither in the crude analysis nor after adjusting for intake of fish or meat (dietary compliance).
    Nutrients, 2018 · checked 2026-09-24

Review. Reviewed on 2026-09-24 for evidence level, dose and population context, and claims a reader could misread. Bioma Learn has no human medical reviewer at this time, and we say so rather than invent one. Methodology. This is information, not medical advice.