BiomaLearnFoodsNutrition factsNutrientsGuidesAnswersEvidence

Kombucha: three small trials, no health effect that held up

Kombucha has been tested in people only a few times, and the results are mostly blank. In a randomized trial in 59 adults with excess weight, all on a 500 calories a day deficit diet, adding 6.8 fl oz (200 mL) of green tea kombucha daily for 10 weeks made no difference against diet alone for cholesterol, blood sugar markers or uric acid. The falls in LDL and triglycerides quoted from that trial happened within the kombucha group and did not beat the control group. In 24 healthy adults on a low-fiber Western diet, a 16 oz bottle a day for 4 weeks changed no blood or inflammation marker across the group and shifted gut bacteria modestly. Both trials were open label and small. This is the evidence as it stands, and it gives no reason to drink kombucha for your metabolism.

Every statement here is tied to a source. The badge says what kind of evidence stands behind it: A is a meta-analysis or systematic review, E is the position of an expert body without its own analysis. How we verify →

We have no USDA entry for kombucha itself in this cohort. The evidence below stands on published studies rather than on a composition table, and we would rather say that than show you a number for something else.

How much is actually in it

What a real portion looks like

What cooking and storage change

What it does to your health

Safety, limits and interactions

Who this works differently for

The bottom line

The one positive trial used a changed product. In 40 adults with constipation-type IBS, 7.4 fl oz (220 mL) a day of a pasteurized kombucha drink with added inulin fiber raised stool frequency from 0.60 to 0.85 a day over 10 days, while water changed nothing. Because fiber was added, that result cannot be credited to kombucha itself. In the healthy volunteer trial, fasting insulin rose within the kombucha group, an exploratory finding in 16 drinkers. A lab analysis of 38 foods found it supplies more than 1,000 mg of acetate per serve, like vinegar, from few kombucha samples. A bottle in US survey data is 12 fl oz, 372 g, though many sold are 16 oz. That acidity is behind the one clear safety point. In France an adult got lead poisoning from kombucha stored in a lead-glazed earthenware jug, a hazard of the container. A 2016 report of liver injury in one woman adds to a few case reports of serious reactions, with causality not established. We found no evidence on kombucha in pregnancy, in children or with medicines, and no data on its alcohol content made it into this page.

More from the same food group (tea)

Sources

  1. kmbc-r4-04 · food analysis
    Acetate is the most abundant SCFA detected, with kombucha and vinegar found to provide >1000 mg of acetate per serve.
    Mol Nutr Food Res, 2021 · checked 2026-09-29
  2. kmbc-r4-08 · food portion data
    FNDDS 92306920 Tea, kombucha (fdc 2710509) | 1 can or bottle (12 fl oz) | 372 g || 1 fl oz (no ice) | 31 g || Quantity not specified | 372 g
    FNDDS 2021-2023, USDA, code 92306920 (Tea, kombucha) · checked 2026-09-29
  3. kmbc-r4-09 · validation study
    As most fermented foods do not have established serving sizes, portion sizes were based on servings reported by Wastyk et al. [27], in which 6 ounces/175 g constituted one portion of kombucha, yoghurt, kefir and buttermilk and 0.25 cup/40 g for fermented vegetables.
    J Hum Nutr Diet, 2026 · checked 2026-09-29
  4. kmbc-r4-06 · case report
    In both cases, the environmental investigation evidenced one main source of lead exposure, namely a lead-glazed earthenware jug in which a drink was stored, "kefir" in the first case, and "kombucha" tea in the second one.
    Rev Med Interne, 2009 · checked 2026-09-29
  5. kmbc-r4-01 · randomized controlled trial
    However, in the total sample (Δ = final - initial), no significant differences were found between the control and kombucha groups (p > 0.05) for any evaluated marker.
    J Food Sci, 2026 · checked 2026-09-29
  6. kmbc-r4-02 · randomized controlled trial
    We did not observe significant changes in either biochemical parameters or levels of circulating markers of inflammation across the entire cohort.
    Sci Rep, 2024 · checked 2026-09-29
  7. kmbc-r4-05 · case report
    There is concern, however, from the evidence of a few case reports currently available, that it may pose life-threatening and/or adverse effects for users.
    S D Med, 2016 · checked 2026-09-29
  8. kmbc-r4-03 · randomized controlled trial
    Significant increase of stool frequency was found at the EOT compared to BL in KG (n=20), Mean±SD: 0.60±0.31 to 0.85±0.19 times/day; p=0.004, while there was no change in CG (n=20): 0.63±0.33 vs 0.72±0.28, p=0.6.
    Vopr Pitan, 2022 · checked 2026-09-29

Review. Reviewed on 2026-09-29 for evidence level, dose and population context, and claims a reader could misread. Bioma Learn has no human medical reviewer at this time, and we say so rather than invent one. Methodology. This is information, not medical advice.