BiomaLearnFoodsNutrientsGuidesAnswersEvidence

Kale: 325 percent on the label, 4.7 percent in the blood

Kale's vitamin K figure is the biggest number on any vegetable label we hold, 325 percent of the Daily Value per 100 grams. Seven people ate 400 grams of it with oil, with the vitamin K labelled so it could be tracked, and the modelled bioavailability came out at 4.7 percent. The peak arrived 6 to 10 hours later and then fell away. Vitamin K deficiency is rare and this does not mean kale fails to supply it. It means the percentage on a nutrition table describes the leaf rather than the person, and that gap is larger for kale than for almost anything else.

Every statement here is tied to a source. The badge says what kind of evidence stands behind it: A is a meta-analysis or systematic review, E is the position of an expert body without its own analysis. How we verify →

The numbers, per 100 g

USDA entrykcalProteinCarbsFiber
Kale, cooked, boiled, drained362.94 g5.3 g4 g
Kale, raw352.92 g4.42 g4.1 g
Kale, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt442.94 g5.3 g2.3 g
Kale, frozen, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt362.94 g5.3 g2.3 g
Kale, frozen, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt362.94 g5.3 g— g
Kale, frozen, unprepared282.66 g4.88 g2 g

These are the USDA entries that are kale, not foods made from it. Follow a name for the full profile and per-portion figures.

How much is actually in it

What your body absorbs

What cooking and storage change

What it does to your health

What people believe that the data does not support

The bottom line

Two beliefs about kale come apart when tested. Raw is not automatically better: cooked Ethiopian kale cut aflatoxin-induced DNA damage by a third while the raw version managed 21 percent and missed significance, though raw did lower an inflammatory marker that cooked did not. And the oestrogen story, that cruciferous vegetables shift hormone metabolism into a protective ratio, was tested head-on in 78 women for eight weeks and produced nothing at all. The trial worth knowing is the diabetes one: the equivalent of 341 grams of kale a day for twelve weeks lowered HbA1c and insulin resistance in 30 patients, and calorie intake fell too, which may be doing some of the work.

Sources

  1. kal-dr-01 · stable isotope absorption study
    Modelling results demonstrated a mean (n 6) bioavailability of phylloquinone from kale to be 4.7%.
    Br J Nutr, 2010 · checked 2026-09-22
  2. kal-dr-05 · randomised crossover stable isotope absorption study
    Spinach was significantly higher in calcium and polyphenols than kale and absorption from the spinach meal was 24% lower compared to the kale meal without added OA, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (P>0.16).
    Eur J Clin Nutr, 2008 · checked 2026-09-22
  3. kal-dr-02 · randomised controlled crossover trial
    Cooked B. carinata significantly reduced DNA damage induced by AFB1 as compared to baseline levels (+S9 mix: 35%, -S9 mix: 33%, p ≤ 0.01, respectively). Raw B. carinata only reduced DNA damage by S9-activated AFB1 by 21% (p = 0.08).
    Nutrients, 2018 · checked 2026-09-22
  4. kal-dr-06 · systematic review of analytical methods
    Cruciferous vegetables and oilseeds are rich in glucosinolates that can transform into isothiocyanates upon enzymic hydrolysis during post-harvest handling, food preparation and/or digestion.
    Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 2024 · checked 2026-09-22
  5. kal-dr-03 · randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial
    A significant reduction in HbA1c, insulin resistance, body weight, and calorie intake was observed in the intervention group compared to control.
    Nutrients, 2024 · checked 2026-09-22
  6. kal-dr-04 · randomised placebo-controlled trial
    Intent-to-treat repeated measures-ANOVA with multiple imputation (n=100) for missing values identified no treatment effect (P=0.9) or treatment-by-time interaction (P=0.6); however, a significant time effect was noted (P=0.02).
    Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2024 · checked 2026-09-22

Review. This page predates our review log, so no review date is shown; it is queued for a fresh review. Last updated 2026-09-22. Bioma Learn has no human medical reviewer at this time, and we say so rather than invent one. Methodology. This is information, not medical advice.