BiomaLearnFoodsNutrition factsNutrientsGuidesAnswersEvidence

Farro: old wheat that still behaves like wheat

Farro is sold as old hulled wheats, and almost all the human research sits under their own names, emmer, einkorn and spelt, tested as bread or pasta rather than as the cooked grain. The strongest evidence is a pair of blinded crossover trials in 40 adults with self-reported non-celiac wheat sensitivity, 20 per trial. On single test days, gut symptoms did not differ significantly between bread made from bread wheat, spelt or emmer, whether it was yeast or sourdough fermented. Yeast and sourdough bread were tested in separate trials, so that comparison is looser. In 16 healthy adults, a single meal of einkorn sourdough bread gave a 2-hour glucose area of 12,216 against 13,849 mg/dL x h for commercial wheat bread, and because the commercial loaf was not sourdough, the grain and the fermentation cannot be told apart. For celiac disease the answer is no. In an open, non-randomized study of 8 patients in remission, 100 g a day of einkorn biscuits for 60 days left four of the five who finished with Marsh III gut damage.

Every statement here is tied to a source. The badge says what kind of evidence stands behind it: A is a meta-analysis or systematic review, E is the position of an expert body without its own analysis. How we verify →

The numbers, per 3.5 oz (100 g)

USDA entrykcalProteinFatCarbsFiber
Farro, pearled, dry, raw34412.6 g3.1 g72.1 g7.31 g

These are the USDA entries that are farro, not foods made from it; they differ in cut, part, pack or preparation. Linked names have a page with the full profile and per-portion figures.

How much is actually in it

What cooking and storage change

What it does to your health

Safety, limits and interactions

What people believe that the data does not support

What is still unknown

The bottom line

Across 8 USDA samples of dry pearled farro, 100 g held 7.3 g of fiber, 4.0 mg of zinc, 3.2 mg of iron and 119 mg of magnesium. Zinc ranged from 2.45 to 5.0 mg between samples, and whole unpearled farro was not sampled at all. We have no survey portion for farro, so there is no per-serving figure here. One trial points somewhere interesting and is too small to lean on. In 42 people with irritable bowel syndrome on a 4-week low-FODMAP diet, pasta made from emmer and rye flour lowered the IBS-SSS symptom score by 153 points against 83 with gluten-free pasta. The study was registered after the fact and mixed emmer with rye, so emmer on its own was never tested. Who should be careful: anyone with celiac disease, and anyone told to avoid wheat, because all three farro grains are wheats. The US gluten-free labeling rule names spelt wheat, one of the three farro wheats, as a gluten-containing grain that rules out a gluten-free label, and emmer and einkorn are wheats as well. A single 2.5 g dose of einkorn in 12 celiac patients caused 8 gut events against 11 for rice. That looks reassuring and is not, because the gut permeability test used also failed to react to a known toxic wheat protein, and the authors say no conclusion on safety can be drawn from it. The 60-day einkorn study described at the top is the longer test, and it pointed to harm. We found no trial of cooked farro grain in people, and no data on how much of its zinc and iron the body absorbs.

Farro compared

More from the same food group (cereal grains and pasta)

Sources

  1. far-r8-01 · USDA FoodData Central Foundation Foods, dataset
    Farro, pearled, dry, raw (FDC 2710828, Foundation, 8 samples): fiber 7.31 g (5.68-9.14); zinc 3.968 mg (2.45-5.0); iron 3.195 mg (2.78-4.21); magnesium 118.8 mg (99.5-134.0); copper 0.4703 mg (0.335-0.545) per 100 g
    USDA FoodData Central, Foundation Foods, FDC 2710828, release 2026-04-30 · checked 2026-09-28
  2. far-r8-04 · RCT, crossover
    GI symptoms did not differ significantly between breads of different grains [YF bread wheat median ΔVAS 10.4 mm (IQR 0.0-17.8 mm), spelt 4.9 mm (-7.6 to 9.4 mm), emmer 11.0 mm (0.0-21.3 mm), P = 0.267; SF bread wheat 10.5 mm (-3.1 to 31.5 mm), spelt 11.3 mm (0.0-15.3 mm), emmer 4.0 mm (-2.9 to 9.3 mm), P = 0.144].
    Am J Clin Nutr, 2024 · checked 2026-09-28
  3. far-r8-02 · RCT, crossover, acute
    Glucose AUCs were significantly lower after the consumption of sourdough breads made with organic (12,754±1433mg/dL×h) and einkorn flour (12,216±1210mg/dL×h), with respect to the commercial bread (13,849±2193mg/dL×h).
    Food Res Int, 2017 · checked 2026-09-28
  4. far-r8-03 · RCT, parallel, 4 weeks
    Forty-two IBS patients followed a 4-week low-FODMAP diet with either traditional gluten-free pasta or functional pasta (FP) made from emmer and rye flour. ... Patients consuming FP showed a significant reduction in IBS-SSS scores compared to the control group (- 153 ± 124 vs. - 83 ± 85, p = 0.044).
    Eur J Nutr, 2025 · checked 2026-09-28
  5. far-r8-05 · clinical trial, open label
    Protocol involved 60-day administration of 100 g/day Tm water biscuits to CD patients in remission on gluten-free diet. ... All patients had Marsh II lesion at T0, four had Marsh III and one had recurrence of dermatitis herpetiformis at T60. CD-related antibodies converted from negative to positive at T60 in three patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that Tm is toxic for CD patients as judged on histological and serological criteria
    Eur J Nutr, 2015 · checked 2026-09-28
  6. far-r8-07 · regulation, FDA
    An ingredient that is a gluten-containing grain (e.g., spelt wheat)
    FDA, Questions and Answers on the Gluten-Free Food Labeling Final Rule (21 CFR 101.91) · checked 2026-09-28
  7. far-r8-06 · RCT, crossover, single dose
    Adverse gastrointestinal events were 8 for Tm, Vs 11 for rice (p = 0.6321) and Vs 31 for Amygluten p = 0.0016) ... No definite conclusion can be drawn on the safety of Tm, based on no change in urinary L/R because even Amygluten, a toxic wheat protein, did not cause a significant change in urinary L/R
    BMC Gastroenterol, 2013 · checked 2026-09-28

Review. Reviewed on 2026-09-28 for evidence level, dose and population context, and claims a reader could misread. Bioma Learn has no human medical reviewer at this time, and we say so rather than invent one. Methodology. This is information, not medical advice.