BiomaLearnFoodsNutrition factsNutrientsGuidesAnswersEvidence

Cottonseed oil: lower LDL in a handful of industry-funded trials

Cottonseed oil lowers LDL cholesterol in the trials that exist, and very few exist. A 2024 systematic review found 2 randomized trials with 58 adults in total. In the 56-day one, with the oil supplying 30 percent of energy, LDL fell about 14 mg/dL more than on olive oil. Both trials were funded by the National Cottonseed Products Association and Cotton Incorporated. A newer 4-week trial in 91 adults with obesity or high cholesterol, mostly women, found LDL 11.7 and 12.9 mg/dL lower at 20 and 30 percent of energy from the oil than on a control oil blend. At 10 percent of energy the drop of 6.8 mg/dL did not reach significance (P = 0.08). These doses sit far above normal use, and a tablespoon of the oil weighs 14 g.

Every statement here is tied to a source. The badge says what kind of evidence stands behind it: A is a meta-analysis or systematic review, E is the position of an expert body without its own analysis. How we verify →

The numbers, per 3.5 oz (100 g)

USDA entrykcalProteinFatCarbsFiber
Oil, cottonseed, salad or cooking8840 g100 g0 g0 g
Oil, industrial, cottonseed, fully hydrogenated8840 g100 g0 g0 g

These are the USDA entries that are cottonseed oil, not foods made from it; they differ in cut, part, pack or preparation. Linked names have a page with the full profile and per-portion figures.

As people eat it, per 3.5 oz (100 g)

As eatenkcalProteinFatCarbsFiber
Cottonseed oil8840 g100 g0 g0 g

USDA Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies (FNDDS, release 2024-10-31): cottonseed oil as it is prepared and served, from the recipes behind the national dietary survey, rather than a single laboratory sample.

How much is actually in it

What a real portion looks like

What it does to your health

Safety, limits and interactions

What people believe that the data does not support

Who this works differently for

What is still unknown

The bottom line

Why the answer stays uncertain is simple. The two trials in the 2024 review were paid for by cotton industry bodies, and nobody has repeated them independently. In an 8-week trial of 43 adults with high cholesterol, LDL fell by 19.7 mg/dL on cottonseed oil against 5.7 mg/dL on olive oil. The 5-day crossover trial studied 15 healthy young men only, and their LDL went from 92.2 to 78.1 mg/dL, a within-group change over a very short diet. The worry that an omega-6 rich oil inflames the body was tested. In an 8-week trial of 42 adults with untreated high cholesterol, getting 30 percent of energy from cottonseed oil made no difference to CRP, TNF-alpha, IL-6 or IL-1beta compared with olive oil, a null result from a small sample and a secondary outcome. In the 15 young men, TNF-alpha fell by 0.12 pg/ml against 0.01 on olive oil, a tiny change of uncertain clinical meaning. Hunger ratings dropped at all three doses in the 4-week trial, while the hormones measured did not follow the dose. Per 100 g, USDA lists 35.3 mg vitamin E and 25.9 g saturated fat, from a single legacy record with no measured spread. The UK table gives 42.77 mg vitamin E, 50.1 g omega-6 and 0.1 g omega-3. Two cautions come from the records. In the 4-week trial body weight rose in all three cottonseed oil groups and did not change on the control blend, and the oil was added to the diet rather than swapped for other fat. US law caps free gossypol, the toxic pigment of cottonseed, at 450 ppm, but that rule covers kernel products and flours, and we found no separate limit for the refined oil. We have no card on allergy, pregnancy or medicines for this oil.

More from the same food group (fats and oils)

Sources

  1. cto-r7-11 · USDA FoodData Central SR Legacy, dataset
    Oil, cottonseed, salad or cooking (FDC 171024, sr_legacy, Fats and Oils): vitamin E 35.3 mg per 100 g = 235% DV; saturated fat 25.9 g; fat 100 g; Foundation samples 0
    USDA FoodData Central, SR Legacy, FDC 171024 · checked 2026-09-28
  2. cto-r7-12 · CoFID 2021, dataset
    Oil, cottonseed [17-034]: vitamin E 42.77 mg; Satd FA 26.10 g; Poly FA 50.20 g; n-6 poly 50.10 g; n-3 poly 0.10 g; Mono FA 18.30 g per 100 g
    CoFID 2021, Public Health England, code 17-034 (OGL v3.0) · checked 2026-09-28
  3. cto-r7-13 · FNDDS, dataset
    Cottonseed oil, FNDDS 82103000 (fdc_id 2710184): 1 tablespoon = 14 g; 1 cup = 224 g
    USDA FNDDS, Cottonseed oil, code 82103000 (FDC 2710184) · checked 2026-09-28
  4. cto-r7-01 · Systematic review of RCTs
    In total, 3 eligible publications (n = 2 trials), with 58 participants that provided 44% and 30% of total energy as CSO, were included. ... In a 56-day trial, CSO lowered total cholesterol (TC; ≈ -14.8 mg/dL), LDL-C (≈ -14.0 mg/dL), and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (≈ -14.2 mg/dL) vs OO.
    Nutr Rev, 2024 · checked 2026-09-28
  5. cto-r7-03 · RCT
    Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduced in MID and HIGH (-11.7 mg/dL and -12.9 mg/dL, respectively; P < 0.05 for both) with a trend for reduction in LOW (-6.8 mg/dL; P = 0.08) compared with no change in CON.
    J Nutr, 2026 · checked 2026-09-28
  6. cto-r7-06 · RCT
    There were greater reductions from baseline to week 8 in fasting serum total cholesterol (TC; -17.0 ± 3.94 mg/dL compared with -2.18 ± 3.72 mg/dL, respectively; P = 0.008), LDL cholesterol (-19.7 ± 3.94 mg/dL compared with -5.72 ± 4.23 mg/dL, respectively; P = 0.018)
    J Nutr, 2022 · checked 2026-09-28
  7. cto-r7-09 · RCT
    The CSO-enriched diets reduced TNF-α (CSO: -0.12 ± 0.02 pg/ml, OO: -0.01 ± 0.05 pg/ml; p < 0.01) and TF (CSO: -0.59 ± 0.68 pg/ml, OO: 1.13 ± 0.83 pg/ml; p = 0.02) compared to OO diets. There were no differences in IL-6, CRP, or PAI-1 between diets.
    Cytokine, 2024 · checked 2026-09-28
  8. cto-r7-10 · RCT
    Subjective hunger was suppressed in LOW, MID, and HIGH (p < 0.01 for all) vs. CON (p = 0.93).
    Physiol Behav, 2026 · checked 2026-09-28
  9. cto-r7-04 · RCT
    For body weight, there was a group × visit interaction (P = 0.01). Post hoc analyses revealed that this interaction was driven by increases in LOW, MID, and HIGH (P < 0.01, P = 0.01, P < 0.001, respectively) compared with no change in CON (P = 0.17).
    J Nutr, 2026 · checked 2026-09-28
  10. cto-r7-14 · Regulation
    Free gossypol content not to exceed 450 parts per million.
    21 CFR 172.894, Modified cottonseed products intended for human consumption · checked 2026-09-28
  11. cto-r7-08 · RCT
    RESULTS: There were no significant differences in fasting C-reactive protein (P = 0.70), tumor necrosis factor-α (P = 0.98), interleukin-6 (P = 0.21), interleukin-1β (P = 0.13), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (P = 0.29), or tissue factor (P = 0.29) between groups across the intervention.
    J Acad Nutr Diet, 2024 · checked 2026-09-28
  12. cto-r7-05 · RCT
    Therefore, 91 participants completed the intervention (20 females and 3 males in the LOW group, 20 females and 3 males in the MID group, 20 females and 2 males in the HIGH group, and 21 females and 2 males in the CON group) and were included in this per-protocol analysis.
    J Nutr, 2026 · checked 2026-09-28
  13. cto-r7-07 · RCT
    Fasting total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides (TG) were lower following CSO diet intervention (total cholesterol: 148.40 ± 6.39 to 135.93 ± 6.31 mg/dL; low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: 92.20 ± 5.57 to 78.13 ± 5.60 mg/dL; TG: 80.11 ± 4.91 to 56.37 ± 5.46 mg/dL for pre- to postdiet, respectively; P < .05).
    Nutr Res, 2018 · checked 2026-09-28
  14. cto-r7-02 · Systematic review of RCTs
    The 3 eligible publications (Table 2)10,25,26 reported results from 2 trials (durations of 5 days and 56 days) and had a total of 58 participants (n = 15 and n = 43 in each study, respectively). ... The studies included were funded by the National Cottonseed Products Association and Cotton Incorporated, with disclaimers that sponsors had no role in the design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation of results.
    Nutr Rev, 2024 · checked 2026-09-28

Review. Reviewed on 2026-09-28 for evidence level, dose and population context, and claims a reader could misread. Bioma Learn has no human medical reviewer at this time, and we say so rather than invent one. Methodology. This is information, not medical advice.