BiomaLearnFoodsNutrition factsNutrientsGuidesAnswersEvidence

Coconut oil vs olive oil: what the cholesterol trials say

By a meta-analysis of 16 trials, coconut oil raised LDL cholesterol by 10.47 mg/dL (95% CI 3.01 to 17.94) against non-tropical vegetable oils such as olive oil, across studies that varied widely and included some that were not randomized. That is the strongest number here, and it is not settled. A later meta-analysis of 7 randomized trials in 515 adults found no significant LDL change from coconut oil (-1.67 mg/dL, 95% CI -6.93 to 3.59), with mixed control fats, high risk of bias and very low certainty. Head to head, the trials split. In 91 UK adults eating 1.8 oz (50 g) a day of extra virgin coconut oil or olive oil for 4 weeks, the change in LDL did not differ between them (difference -1.5 mg/dL (95% CI -10 to 7.3; metric: -0.04 mmol/L, -0.27 to 0.19)). In 156 adults with central obesity over 12 weeks, the olive oil diet ended with lower LDL than the coconut oil diet, and the paper gives no size. The answer stays unclear because the pooled studies differ in design and comparison fat, and the two direct trials disagree.

Every statement here is tied to a source. The badge says what kind of evidence stands behind it: A is a meta-analysis or systematic review, E is the position of an expert body without its own analysis. How we verify →

We have no USDA entry for coconut oil | olive oil itself in this cohort. The evidence below stands on published studies rather than on a composition table, and we would rather say that than show you a number for something else.

How much is actually in it

What a real portion looks like

What your body absorbs

What cooking and storage change

What it does to your health

What people believe that the data does not support

Who this works differently for

The bottom line

Against butter the picture is clearer. In the UK trial butter raised LDL by 15 mg/dL (0.38 mmol/L) more than olive oil. A network meta-analysis of 54 trials found that olive, coconut and seven other oils all lowered LDL by between 8.9 and 16 mg/dL (0.23 and 0.42 mmol/l) compared with butter, a range shared across the oils with no separate figure for this pair. Coconut oil raises HDL cholesterol a little, by 6.2 mg/dL (0.16 mmol/L) more than olive oil in the UK trial and by 3.28 mg/dL in the randomized-only meta-analysis. Coconut oil does not help weight loss. Across 15 trials in 620 adults it changed weight by 0.09 lb (0.04 kg), statistically significant and, in the authors' words, not clinically meaningful, and one study shifts the conclusion in sensitivity analysis. In 20 men given a single test breakfast, 0.88 oz (25 g) of coconut oil left the normal-weight men less hungry than olive oil, but they ate no less at lunch (924 against 845 calories, p = 0.272). For olive oil, a meta-analysis of 51 randomized trials in 4334 adults found no significant change in fasting glucose or HbA1c. The two fats are built differently. In UK tables that do not say whether the oil is refined or virgin, coconut oil has 86.5 g saturated fat per 3.5 oz (100 g), and olive oil has 73 g monounsaturated and 14.3 g saturated fat. Olive oil carries 5.1 mg vitamin E per 3.5 oz (100 g) against 0.66 mg. A 14 g tablespoon of either gives about 125 calories. Four weeks of 50 g a day of coconut oil doubled lauric and myristic acid in blood phospholipids, a marker of intake that barely tracked changes in metabolic markers. In a single meal eaten by 16 people, a salad dressed with olive oil led to 55.2 percent more carotenoid absorption than the same salad with coconut oil. For frying, a trial in 20 obese adults found that virgin olive oil heated through 20 frying cycles caused less oxidative stress than sunflower oil treated the same way. Coconut oil was not tested, and the outcomes were blood markers. Europe refused the claim that olive oil promotes heart health, meaning the evidence was judged insufficient at the time. It authorized a narrower claim for olive oil polyphenols protecting blood lipids from oxidative stress, under conditions of use an ordinary oil may not meet. The register has no entry for coconut oil. We have no card on allergy, pregnancy or medicines for either oil, so this page cannot say who should be careful.

Each food on its own

Questions answered from the trials

Sources

  1. cvol-daily-r6-01 · food composition dataset
    Oil, coconut (CoFID 17-031): Energy 899 kcal, Fat 99.9 g, Satd FA 86.50 g, Mono FA 6.00 g, Poly FA 1.50 g, Vitamin E 0.66 mg per 100 g
    CoFID 2021, Public Health England, code 17-031 (OGL v3.0) · checked 2026-09-29
  2. cvol-daily-r6-02 · food composition dataset
    Oil, olive (CoFID 17-038): Energy 899 kcal, Fat 99.9 g, Satd FA 14.30 g, Mono FA 73.00 g, Poly FA 8.20 g, Vitamin E 5.10 mg per 100 g
    CoFID 2021, Public Health England, code 17-038 (OGL v3.0) · checked 2026-09-29
  3. cvol-daily-r6-03 · food portion dataset
    Coconut oil (FDC 2710182): 1 tablespoon = 14 g, Energy 895 kcal per 100 g, MUFA 6.31 g, PUFA 1.7 g; Olive oil (FDC 2710186): 1 tablespoon = 14 g, Energy 900 kcal per 100 g, MUFA 68.42 g, PUFA 9.469 g
    USDA FNDDS 2021-2023, food codes 82101500 and 82104000 · checked 2026-09-29
  4. cvol-daily-r6-09 · RCT
    The bioaccessibility of TC was greater with olive oil (24.0%) than with coconut oil (14.9%), and with the oil being emulsified (23.5%) rather than that being nonemulsified (15.4%). Similarly, the positive iAUC1-10h of TC, α-carotene, and lycopene were 55.2%, 110.8%, and 45.8%, respectively, higher with olive oil than with coconut oil.
    Am J Clin Nutr, 2023 · checked 2026-09-29
  5. cvol-daily-r6-10 · RCT
    Coconut oil doubled lauric acid (C12:0) and myristic acid (C14:0), butter increased those to a lesser extent, and olive oil reduced those. β (95% confidence interval) for changes in C12:0 comparing coconut oil to butter and olive oil were +0.04 (0.03-0.05) and +0.05 (0.04-0.06) mol%, respectively; for C14:0, +0.24 (0.17-0.32) and +0.37 (0.29-0.45), respectively. Olive oil increased oleic acid (OA) approximately by 1 mol%, while coconut oil and butter had little effect on OA.
    J Lipid Res, 2024 · checked 2026-09-29
  6. cvol-daily-r6-11 · RCT
    The intake of SFO-breakfast reduced plasma GSH levels and the GSH/GSSG ratio, increased protein carbonyl levels, and induced a higher gene expression of the different NADPH-oxidase subunits, Nrf2-Keap1 activation, gene expression of the antioxidant enzymes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and antioxidant plasma activities than the intake of the breakfasts prepared with VOO, SOP and SOX.
    Food Chem, 2013 · checked 2026-09-29
  7. cvol-daily-r6-04 · meta-analysis
    Coconut oil consumption significantly increased LDL-cholesterol by 10.47 mg/dL (95% CI: 3.01, 17.94; I2 = 84%, N=16) and HDL-cholesterol by 4.00 mg/dL (95% CI: 2.26, 5.73; I2 = 72%, N=16) as compared with nontropical vegetable oils.
    Circulation, 2020 · checked 2026-09-29
  8. cvol-daily-r6-05 · meta-analysis
    Coconut oil intake did not significantly decrease body weight (MD -0.24 kg, 95% CI -0.83 kg to 0.34 kg), waist circumference (MD -0.64 cm, 95% CI -1.69 cm to 0.41 cm), and % body fat (-0.10%, 95% CI -0.56% to 0.36%), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (MD -1.67 mg/dL, 95% CI -6.93 to 3.59 mg/dL), and triglyceride (TG) levels (MD -0.24 mg/dL, 95% CI -5.52 to 5.04 mg/dL). However, coconut oil intake was associated with a small increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (MD 3.28 mg/dL, 95% CI 0.66 to 5.90 mg/dL). Overall risk of bias was high, and certainty of evidence was very-low.
    Lipids Health Dis, 2022 · checked 2026-09-29
  9. cvol-daily-r6-06 · RCT
    LDL-C concentrations were significantly increased on butter compared with coconut oil (+0.42, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.65 mmol/L, P<0.0001) and with olive oil (+0.38, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.60 mmol/L, P<0.0001), with no differences in change of LDL-C in coconut oil compared with olive oil (-0.04, 95% CI -0.27 to 0.19 mmol/L, P=0.74). Coconut oil significantly increased HDL-C compared with butter (+0.18, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.30 mmol/L) or olive oil (+0.16, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.28 mmol/L).
    BMJ Open, 2018 · checked 2026-09-29
  10. cvol-daily-r6-07 · RCT
    The participants consumed isocaloric diets (~ 2400 kcal) enriched with respective test fats (RPOO, EVCO or EVOO) for a 12-week duration. RESULTS: The mean of the primary outcome plasma high sensitivity C-reactive protein was statistically similar between the three diets after a 12-week intervention. EVOO resulted in significantly lower mean LDL cholesterol compared with RPOO and EVCO, despite similar effects on LDL and HDL cholesterol subfractions.
    Eur J Nutr, 2024 · checked 2026-09-29
  11. cvol-daily-r6-08 · network meta-analysis
    Safflower, sunflower, rapeseed, flaxseed, corn, olive, soybean, palm, and coconut oil as well beef fat were more effective in reducing LDL-C (-0.42 to -0.23 mmol/l) as compared with butter.
    J Lipid Res, 2018 · checked 2026-09-29
  12. cvol-daily-r6-13 · meta-analysis
    We found the consumption of olive oil was not associated with statistically significant changes in blood glucose (WMD = -0.04 mg dL-1; 95% CI, -0.1 to 0.02; P = .18; I2 = 27.05%), insulin (WMD = -0.3 µIU mL-1; 95% CI, -0.99 to 0.38; P = .39; I2 = 91.49%), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (WMD = 0.02%, 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.06; P = .21; I2 = 0%)
    Nutr Rev, 2026 · checked 2026-09-29
  13. cvol-daily-r6-12 · meta-analysis
    Our meta-analysis revealed statistically significant effects of coconut oil supplementation on weight and BMI, with mean differences of 0.04 kg (95% CI: 0.01 to 0.08 kg) and 0.01 kg/m2 (95% CI: 0.00 to 0.02). However, the effects were not clinically meaningful.
    BMC Nutr, 2025 · checked 2026-09-29
  14. cvol-daily-r6-15 · authority decision
    POL-HC-7679 Olive Oil Olive Oil promotes your heart health Non-authorised
    EU Register on nutrition and health claims, claim POL-HC-7679, snapshot 2026-09-21 · checked 2026-09-29
  15. cvol-daily-r6-16 · authority decision
    POL-HC-6431 Olive oil polyphenols Olive oil polyphenols contribute to the protection of blood lipids from oxidative stress Authorised
    EU Register on nutrition and health claims, claim POL-HC-6431, snapshot 2026-09-21 · checked 2026-09-29
  16. cvol-daily-r6-14 · RCT
    Visual analogue scale values of hunger and desire to eat decreased significantly after EVCO consumption than EVOO consumption in normal weight subjects at 180 min. There was an increase trend in plasma PYY at 30 and 180 min after EVCO breakfast compared to EVOO breakfast. Ad libitum energy intakes after EVCO and EVOO consumption in normal weight subjects were 924 ± 302; 845 ± 158 kcal (p = 0.272), respectively whereas in obese subjects were 859 ± 238; 994 ± 265 kcal (p = 0.069) respectively.
    PLoS One, 2022 · checked 2026-09-29

Review. Reviewed on 2026-09-29 for evidence level, dose and population context, and claims a reader could misread. Bioma Learn has no human medical reviewer at this time, and we say so rather than invent one. Methodology. This is information, not medical advice.