BiomaLearnFoodsNutrition factsNutrientsGuidesAnswersEvidence

Beef jerky: a protein snack that is mostly a sodium question

Sodium is the number to watch in beef jerky, and it is the one with firm evidence behind it. A meta-analysis of 35 randomized trials in 2,885 people already treated for high blood pressure found that every 100 mmol less sodium a day lowered systolic pressure by 6.81 mm Hg (95% CI 4.96 to 8.66). Those 100 mmol equal 2.3 g of sodium, about what 4.6 oz (130 g) of jerky holds. The US survey database gives beef jerky 1,785 mg sodium and 33.2 g protein per 3.5 oz (100 g), so its default 1.1 oz (30 g) serving carries about 536 mg sodium and 10 g protein. That is one figure with no spread, and brands differ widely. A single meat stick is coded at 7 to 18 g and a cup of pieces at 90 g.

Every statement here is tied to a source. The badge says what kind of evidence stands behind it: A is a meta-analysis or systematic review, E is the position of an expert body without its own analysis. How we verify →

As people eat it, per 3.5 oz (100 g)

As eatenkcalProteinFatCarbsFiber
Beef jerky41033.2 g25.6 g11 g1.8 g

USDA Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies (FNDDS, release 2024-10-31): beef jerky as it is prepared and served, from the recipes behind the national dietary survey, rather than a single laboratory sample.

How much is actually in it

What a real portion looks like

What it does to your health

Safety, limits and interactions

Who this works differently for

The bottom line

In a few young athletes the extra salt looked harmless in the short term. In a randomized trial in 8 trained male runners over three weeks, jerky after exercise left 24-hour urine volume and mean blood pressure unchanged against a standard recovery drink, 81.1 against 81.0 mm Hg. Their kidneys simply excreted the extra sodium. That result comes from eight young athletes and does not carry over to people with high blood pressure or kidney disease. Across 36 cluster trials in 66,803 people, programs that cut salt lowered systolic pressure by 2.64 mm Hg in adults, with no benefit shown in children. Jerky is processed meat, and that evidence is observational. An umbrella review of 54 meta-analyses linked each extra 1.8 oz (50 g) of processed meat a day with a 17 percent higher risk of colorectal cancer and a 72 percent higher risk of gastric cancer. The certainty of that evidence is low to very low, and jerky was never analyzed on its own. A meta-analysis of 31 observational studies linked processed meat with colorectal polyps (RR 1.65, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.61). The link with adenomas did not reach significance (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.41). Food safety is a real if rare concern. In 1995 New Mexico traced a salmonella outbreak of 93 cases to jerky from one local plant, which tells us it can happen and gives no rate. Teeth matter too. In 3,134 Japanese adults with a median age of 71, jerky was the hardest food tested at 14 lb (6.56 kg) of bite force against 1.2 lb (0.53 kg) for bananas, and fewer teeth meant fewer people could chew everything. We found no card on pregnancy, on children eating jerky or on medicines for beef jerky.

Related foods

More from the same food group (cold cuts and cured meats)

Sources

  1. bjrk-r2-01 · USDA FNDDS nutrient values, dataset
    Beef jerky (FNDDS 21602100, fdc_id 2705860, WWEIA Cold cuts and cured meats): Sodium, Na 1785 mg per 100 g; Protein 33.2 g per 100 g; Quantity not specified 30 g = 535.5 mg sodium, 10.0 g protein
    USDA FNDDS 2021-2023, food code 21602100, FDC 2705860 · checked 2026-09-29
  2. bjrk-r2-02 · USDA FNDDS portion weights, dataset
    Beef jerky (FNDDS 21602100, fdc_id 2705860): 1 cup, pieces 90 g; Quantity not specified 30 g; 1 Big Jerk 7 g; 1 Super Jerk 10 g; 1 Giant Jerk 18 g; 1 Slim Jim 10 g; 1 cubic inch 12 g
    USDA FNDDS 2021-2023, food code 21602100, FDC 2705860 · checked 2026-09-29
  3. bjrk-r2-03 · randomized crossover trial
    Eight trained males (age = 22 ± 3 y, VO2max = 66.4 ± 4.2 ml·kg-1·min-1) completed three identical weeks of run training...After exercise, subjects consumed either, a beef nutritional supplement (beef jerky; [B]), a standard recovery drink (SRD), or SRD+B in a randomized counterbalanced design...No main effects of treatment were observed for 24 hr urine volume (SRD, 1.7 ± 0.5; B, 1.8 ± 0.6; SRD+B, 1.4 ± 0.4 L·d-1)...Mean arterial pressure (81.0 ± 4.6, 81.1 ± 7.3, 83.8 ± 5.4 mm Hg) and average exercise running economy (VO2: SRD, 47.9 ± 3.2; B, 47.2 ± 2.6; SRD+B, 46.2 ± 3.4 ml·kg-1·min-1) was not affected. Urinary sodium excretion accounted for the daily sodium intake due to the beef nutritional supplement.
    Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab, 2015 · checked 2026-09-29
  4. bjrk-r2-05 · meta-analysis of RCTs
    This meta-analysis considered 36 articles with 66,803 participants to be eligible. The population-based sodium reduction interventions decreased office systolic BP (SBP) compared with usual care in 36 studies (MD: -2.64 mmHg [95% confidence interval: -3.48- to 1.80]), with evidence of heterogeneity. Office SBP exhibited significant benefits among in adults (30 studies) and adults/children (1 study) but not in children (5 studies).
    Hypertens Res, 2025 · checked 2026-09-29
  5. bjrk-r2-06 · umbrella review
    A total of 34 articles and 54 meta-analyses were included in the review...Dose-response analysis revealed that an increase in PM consumption of 50 g/day was associated with a 72% higher risk of gastric cancer, 17% higher risk of colorectal cancer, 4% higher risk of prostate cancer, and an 8% higher risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). All the above dose-response associations are based on low to very low certainty evidence as assessed by the GRADE system.
    Front Public Health, 2026 · checked 2026-09-29
  6. bjrk-r2-07 · meta-analysis of observational studies
    Thirty-one observational studies were ultimately included...Processed meat consumption was correlated with increased colorectal polyp risk (1.65; 1.05, 2.61) but not colorectal adenoma risk (1.14; 0.93, 1.41).
    Nutr Rev, 2026 · checked 2026-09-29
  7. bjrk-r2-08 · outbreak investigation
    In February 1995, the New Mexico Department of Health (NMDOH) was notified of cases of salmonellosis in two persons who had eaten beef jerky. An investigation by the New Mexico Environment Department determined that these cases were associated with beef jerky processed at a local plant. An investigation by NMDOH identified 91 additional cases.
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 1995 · checked 2026-09-29
  8. bjrk-r2-04 · meta-analysis of RCTs
    Randomized controlled trials with a duration of ≥2 weeks comparing the effect of different levels of sodium intake (measured by 24-hour urinary sodium excretion) on blood pressure in hypertensive individuals treated with constant blood pressure-lowering medications were included...We included 35 studies (median duration of 28 days) with a total of 2885 participants. For every 100 mmol reduction in 24-hour urinary sodium excretion, systolic blood pressure decreased by 6.81 mm Hg (95% CI, 4.96-8.66), diastolic blood pressure decreased by 3.85 mm Hg (95% CI, 2.26-5.43)
    Hypertension, 2024 · checked 2026-09-29
  9. bjrk-r2-09 · cross-sectional study
    Subjects included 1591 men and 1543 women, both with a median age of 71 years...Foods were divided into five groups based on hardness: Group 1 (bananas, etc.), 0.53 kg; Group 2 (boiled rice, etc.), 1.22 kg; Group 3 (raisins, etc.), 2.93 kg; Group 4 (raw carrots, etc.), 4.38 kg; and Group 5 (beef jerky), 6.56 kg...The proportion of subjects for whom all five food groups were masticable showed a significant decrease in the number of teeth in both males and females.
    BMC Oral Health, 2019 · checked 2026-09-29

Review. Reviewed on 2026-09-29 for evidence level, dose and population context, and claims a reader could misread. Bioma Learn has no human medical reviewer at this time, and we say so rather than invent one. Methodology. This is information, not medical advice.